Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-09-19 SB-min Select Board Meeting September 19, 2022 A remote participation meeting of the Lexington Select Board was called to order at 6:32 p.m. on Monday, September 19, 2022 via hybrid meeting services. Ms. Hai, Chair; Mr. Lucente; Vice Chair, Mr. Pato, Ms. Barry, and Mr. Sandeen were present, as well as Ms. Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager; and Ms. Katzenback, Executive Clerk. Ms. Hai stated that the meeting was being conducted via Zoom as posted, with the agenda on the Town’s website PUBLIC COMMENTS None at this time. SELECT BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS AND LIAISON REPORTS 1. Select Board Member Concerns and Liaison Reports The Board reviewed the concerns and liaison reports. DOCUMENTS: Select Board Concerns and Liaison Reports - September 19, 2022 TOWN MANAGER REPORT 1. Town Manager Weekly Update Ms. Kosnoff stated that there are no additional reports from the Town Manager’s Office this evening. DOCUMENTS: Town Manager's Weekly Update Week Ending 9-16-22 CONSENT AGENDA Ms. Hai noted that she is removing item #3, Approve Select Board Report for Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Town Report, from the Consent Agenda, as the document has not yet been fully edited. This will be brought back for a future meeting. 1. Battle Green Use Request – Lexington Veterans Association To approve the request of the Lexington Veterans Association to use the flagpole area of the Battle Green for the purpose of a Military Flag Ceremony in honor of Winston E. "Pat" Flynn, the Town's first Veterans Services Officer (VSO), to be held on Sunday, October 2, 2022 from 3:00pm to 4:00pm. 2. Approve One-Day Liquor Licenses To approve a One-Day Liquor License for the Lexington Retailers Association for the purpose of serving beer in a beer garden within a cordoned off area at the end of Muzzey Street* at Massachusetts Avenue to the southside of 6 Muzzey Street during Lexington Discovery Day on Saturday, October 8, 2022 from 11:30am to 3:30pm. *The location for the Lexington Discovery Day beer garden is subject to modification as may be required by Department of Public Works and Town Engineering up to the time of the event due to potential work for the Center Streetscape Project. To approve two One-Day Liquor Licenses for the Lexington Historical Society to serve beer, wine, and cider at Buckman Tavern, 1 Bedford Street, for the purpose of the two events as follows: Tavern Night on Saturday, October 22, 2022 from 5:00pm to 8:00pm outside, directly behind Buckman Tavern near the garden area; and Tavern Night on Saturday, November 19, 2022 from 5:00pm to 7:00pm inside of Buckman Tavern. DOCUMENTS: 2022 Lexington Discovery Day Beer Garden Location Map, 2022 Lexington Discovery Day Beer Garden Procedures for Serving Alcohol 3. Approve Select Board Report for Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Town Report This item was removed from the Consent Agenda. 4. Select Board Committee Reappointments & Resignation To reappoint the board and committee members as indicated on the attached list effective on October 1, 2022. To accept the resignation of Rina Kodendera from the Vision for Lexington Committee effective immediately. DOCUMENTS: 2022 September Board/Committee Reappointments/Do Not Reappoints, Resignation Letter - R. Kodendera 5. Approve and Sign Proclamation – Recognition of Winston E. "Pat" Flynn To approve and sign a proclamation recognizing and posthumously honoring Winston E. "Pat" Flynn and to further name Monday, October 3, 2022 as Winston E. "Pat" Flynn Day in the Town of Lexington. DOCUMENTS: 2022 Recognition of Winston E. "Pat" Flynn Proclamation VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve items 1, 2, 4, & 5 of the Consent Agenda. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION 1. Public Hearing: All-Alcohol Package Store Liquor License - Art's Specialties, LLC, 6:40pm 1666 Massachusetts Avenue, Unit H Mr. Lucente recused himself from this item. Ms. Hai opened this public hearing at 6:37pm. She noted that all of the necessary documents have been provided by the applicant for this Liquor License application. The application was submitted to the relevant Town staff for review, including Building, Zoning and Health Departments, and they have no objections to the Liquor License application in relationship to their departments. It was noted that the applicant must obtain any required permits or licenses from those respective departments that may be needed prior to opening the package store. In accordance with MGL Chapter 138, the legal notice ran in the September 8, 2022 Lexington Minuteman and the applicant mailed the required notices to abutters. Artur Nergaryan, Art's Specialties, LLC, explained that he began his cheese & wine shop in Belmont in 2015. He has since opened locations in Belmont and Sherbourne. All of the stores look and run the same. He sells a variety of different kinds of wine and craft beers. He also sells approximately 30% of food with the wine, such as selected cheeses, charcuterie items, and crackers. He chose Lexington as approximately 10%-20% of his existing customers come from Lexington to his other stores. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Nergaryan stated that he is not concerned regarding the number of other licenses recently granted in the Center neighborhood. All of the stores will likely benefit from each other and keep customers in Lexington. Ms. Hai closed the hearing at 6:42pm. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 4-0 to approve the application from Arts Specialties, LLC for an All-Alcohol Package Store to be located at 1666 Massachusetts Avenue, Unit H, for the hours of 10:00am to 8:00pm. Monday through Saturday and 12:00pm to 8:00pm Sunday and, after the application has been approved by the ABCC, to issue the All- Alcohol Package Store Liquor License to Art’s Specialties, LLC. DOCUMENTS: Application for Package Store - Art's Specialties, LLC, Map showing Location of current package stores and new request, Presentation - Arts Specialties Lexington 2. Liquor License – Change of Manager and Change of Corporate Name – The Upper Crust Pizzeria, 41 Waltham Street Ms. Hai explained that The Upper Crust has submitted all the necessary paperwork needed to request a change of manager to be Rami Khatatba as well as a change of corporate name from UC Lexington LLC to UC New England LLC on their Wine and Malt Alcohol Common Victualler Liquor License. The proposed manager, Rami Khatatba, submitted a current Alcohol Awareness Training Certificate and the required CORI check has been completed. A corporate merger occurred on April 1, 2016, and was registered with the Secretary of State’s Office, however it was not registered with the ABCC at that time. The required Business Structure documents detailing the merger has been provided. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Patty Berry, UC New England representative, explained that Mr. Khatatba has been acting as manager since he was appointed as manager back in October 2021. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the application from The Upper Crust for a Change of Manager and Change of Corporate Name and, once approved by the ABCC, issue an amended 2022 Wine and Malt Common Liquor License to UC New England LLC d/b/a The Upper Crust, Manager Rami Khatatba. DOCUMENTS: Liquor License Amendment Application - Change of MGR, Corp Name 3. Discussion of Additional Funding Requests Under American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Derek Sencabaugh, Fire Chief; Mike McLean, Police Chief; and Mike Cronin, Director of Public Facilities, addressed the Board. Mr. Cronin explained that, approximately a year and a half ago, he requested permission to have the Cary Memorial Building cupola temporarily set up for the transmission of certain signals that would normally happen at the Police Station. Step two was bringing the equipment down to the 173 Bedford Street location and also setting up a temporary radio system there. At that time, it was determined that the technology did not match from an age standpoint. Gaps in coverage are now being experienced. Chief Sencabaugh stated that there have been problems with the coverage in the community since these moves were made. At the temporary Police Station at 173 Bedford Street, the lines are VOIP, not copper, and, as a result, there is not consistent radio communications for the Police, Fire and Dispatch. Some examples of problems include that during the recent transformer fire, the Fire Department was not able to communicate with other Fire Departments that responded, and there have been instances in which Police Officers have called for assistance and found their radios didn’t work. The group has reviewed the equipment that needs to be replaced and identified nine antenna locations and equipment that needs to be replaced. The cost is approximately $800,000. Chief McLean stated that the Police Department has been experiencing lapses and drop-offs in radio transmissions on a shift basis. He does not feel that there is a temporary fix available, after speaking with subject matter experts, and does not want to risk the safety of the community or any of the public safety staff on the street. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Cronin stated that there was no proposed scope for upgrading the system as part of the rebuild of the 1575 building. It was believed the equipment was going to be able to be removed and brought back without issue. Ms. Hai asked about the five-year Capital Plan for periodic updates and upgrades to the emergency communications equipment. Chief Sencabaugh stated that he is unsure about the cycle for this Capital Plan but believes that the Fire Department and Police Department’s equipment is around 20 years in age. Mr. Cronin stated that projects like this can be included in the Capital Plan so that they are not lost down the road and kept track of. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Cronin stated that the equipment being proposed is the correct option to support the Town for the next 20 years. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente regarding how this item might be funded if not through the ARPA funds, Ms. Kosnoff stated that this could be brought to Town Meeting for an appropriation request. This is a capital request and something that could be brought forward in the Capital Plan. However, this item is very time-sensitive and waiting two months to Special Town Meeting could have detrimental effects. The other alternative would be funding this through a Reserve Fund transfer. Money is set aside in the budget each year for extraordinary and unforeseen expenses. That money can be released by a vote of the Appropriation Committee. There is only $750,000 set aside in the FY23 budget Reserve Fund. This request would require more funding than is available in the Reserve Fund, but this could potentially be addressed by appropriating more tax levy money into the Reserve Fund at Special Town Meeting. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. Cronin explained that the quotes for this work total close to $700,000, but he always includes a potential 10% contingency. It was noted that this equipment is potentially 6-8 months out from being delivered. Chief Sencabaugh stated that the radio technicians are constantly being brought in to try to make improvements. Ms. Barry noted that she believes the Reserve Fund, or some amount of the Reserve Fund along with some ARPA funds would be a good way to fund this project. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Chief Sencabaugh explained that the Town has permission to do work on all of the nine sites proposed for this project. Ms. Barry asked about discussing the interim 6-month period with MEMA, FEMA, or the federal government. It was noted that this has not yet been considered. Ms. Barry noted that she is very disappointed that the ball was dropped in this situation. Mr. Pato stated that he is having trouble finding a nexus for this project to be funded through ARPA funding. His preference would be to allocate this from the Reserve Fund, with a plan to go to Special Town Meeting to replenish the Reserve Fund out of the tax levy. The Board could authorize an overrun amount out of ARPA funds, with the hope that it will not need to be used. In response to a question from Mr. Pato regarding some recently replaced transmitter equipment on the Route 2 tower, Chief Sencabaugh stated that this was new equipment, but an old technology that will no longer be supported. Mr. Pato also expressed his discomfort that the move was not planned for in regard to a change in technology. Mr. Sandeen stated that he does not see this as an ARPA-related expense. He sees this as an unexpected cost of the Police Station move, and that funds should be allocated appropriately. He recommended using the Reserve Fund and then requesting to appropriate additional reserve funds at Special Town Meeting. He stated that he believes ARPA funds are designed to assist residents and businesses with recovering from the pandemic. Ms. Barry stated that public safety has been there through COVID and continues to be there through COVID. They cannot be there for residents through COVID if they don't have a communication system. She would support some of the funding being covered through ARPA funds, while the rest is taken from the Reserve Fund. She requested that a conversation take place between the Town’s public safety officials and the appropriate party at the State and Federal level to see if they could come in and assist us in this interim time. Ms. Hai noted that, in setting the Board’s priorities for ARPA, one of them was public health and safety. This certainly falls into the public safety category; however, this really is an unexpected capital expense. She would prefer to use the Reserve Fund for this. She also echoed Ms. Barry's comment regarding seeking interim help from the State, because six months is an incredibly unsettling thought. She agreed with starting the funding for this project at $750,000 from the Reserve Fund and authorizing whatever excess is needed from ARPA, while requesting at Special Town Meeting that the full amount necessary be allocated. Ms. Barry noted that it is unfortunate that neither the Appropriation Committee, nor the Capital Expenditures Committee were in the loop on this item prior to this meeting. Dawn McKenna, Precinct 6 Town Meeting Member, stated that she does not believe this should be funded by ARPA funds and does not believe ARPA funds should be used as backup for this item. VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to authorize up to $750,000 from the Reserve Fund and up to $50,000 from ARPA funds to cover the public safety and communications system, as necessary, and further, to add to the Special Town Meeting 2022-3 a request to appropriate an amount to the Reserve Fund in replenishment. DOCUMENTS: Lexington Fire Department Communication Infrastructure Quote, Lexington Police Department Radio System Quote, Lexington Police Simulcast Radio System Quote, Lexington Police Simulcast Radio System PDHQ Quote, Liberty Ride Trolley Tours-9-19-2022 4. Special Town Meeting 2022-3 - Presentation - STM 2022-3 Article: Appropriate for Public Facilities Capital Projects (Town Pool Domestic Hot Water Heater) Mr. Cronin stated that the Select Board is being asked to review and discuss the various options for domestic hot water heater replacements that were evaluated and presented in the Design Memorandum. There were seven new options evaluated, plus the direct replacement of the oil-fired burner. He explained that there was an assumption made regarding how many gallons of hot water per hour was needed for the pool area; this was approximately 105 gallons. There are two different systems that are being recommended by the engineer: options three and seven. The third option is a solar-assisted heat pump, and the seventh option is a solar hot water heater system. The solar-assisted heat pump is preferred because it has a low operational cost, great energy efficiency, and is fairly small from a from a size standpoint. The solar hot water heater system is the lesser preferred option because it is unclear what the impact on the roof would be. He noted that there was an approximately $10,000 additional cost associated with demolition of the existing system, and there will be a cost to engineer each system to tie into the existing system. Thus, the estimated cost for option number three is $35,000. Mr. Cronin stated that this will need to be brought to Special Town Meeting for appropriation. If this is approved, there would be enough time to appropriate funds, purchase the system and have it installed, hopefully before the beginning of the next hot water season, which is Memorial Day. It is unclear if the current system will make it through another season. If the system goes down, the entire Complex must shut down because the Town is required to have domestic hot water available to take showers and wash hands. Mr. Sandeen stated that option seven has a substantially lower cost than option three over the long-term. His other concern regarding option three is that these systems are clearly European-oriented, and it is unclear if they are compatible with US power. It is unclear if there are service networks around here for this product. The spec sheets state that these are 2kW and he believes this might be smaller than what the Town needs. While he would support either option, option seven seems to be sized appropriately to the needs of this project and will deliver a much lower total lifecycle cost than option three. Ms. Barry stated that she has wanted a solar system on the roof of that building for a long time and, thus, supports option seven. Melissa Battite, Director of Recreation & Community Program, stated that she would like the system that gives the best return on the investment, but also the system that is going to provide the best maintenance and opportunity to sustain the new system. She stated that the pool averages 400 people per day and is a lifeline to many. She does not want to see its short season interrupted. Mr. Pato stated that he also has some concerns regarding option three. He is a little concerned about availability of parts or replacements over time, if there is not a large US presence for this company. If option seven could be executed in a timely fashion, that would likely be his choice. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. Cronin stated that option seven would require approximately 14 panels to be installed on the sun side of the roof. Mr. Lucente stated he would support option three in order to maximize the use of the current roof with an all-solar system at some later point. Mr. Cronin stated that he can investigate solar as a whole system but is concerned about the structural integrity of the roof to support a full solar system. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Cronin stated that he is unsure about the age of that building and the expected remaining lifespan of that building. The roof is relatively new, but he is concerned with the underlying structure. Ms. Battite stated that the roof was renovated in 2018. Mr. Sandeen noted that the new Inflation Reduction Act provides a 30% tax credit for solar energy systems. He does not believe option three would qualify for this. Mr. Cronin stated that, in speaking with the engineer, he believes both options would qualify. Mr. Cronin stated that, regarding the concern over option three being a European-based company, he spoke to the engineer and highlighted the exact same issues. The engineer said that there have been recent installations in the US which have gone well. Ms. Barry requested that Mr. Cronin present this to the Recreation Committee at its next meeting. DOCUMENTS: Design Memorandum- Domestic Water Replacement Options, Hot Water Heater - Option 3, Hot Water Heater - Option 7 5. Update on Liberty Ride Casey Hagerty, Economic Development Coordinator, explained that Liberty Ride was operating out of the temporary Visitor Center in 2019. In 2020 it did not operate at all. In 2021/2022 it has been operating on a part-time schedule. She explained that a survey was sent to approximately 40 board and committee members, from the Select Board, Planning Board, Tourism Committee, EDAC and Lexington Center Committee. 13 responses were received, and most were very positive. The responders felt that the Town benefits from Liberty Ride and it should continue as a municipal service. People felt that the guided aspect of the tour was important and served as a special tourism experience in Lexington. People felt that there were different operational changes that could be made. This survey was also sent to 20 Center businesses and other businesses that are directly impacted by the tourism economy. Seven responses were received and were all very positive as well. 100% of the businesses felt that Liberty Ride brought customers into their stores. Some of the businesses felt that more stops should be added. This survey was also sent to people who bought digital tickets for Liberty Ride. 290 responses were received, and they were overwhelmingly positive. For a short period, this summer, Liberty Ride had to operate out of a bus due to mechanical problems with the trolley. During that period, Liberty Ride received some negative feedback, so the trolley aspect seems very important. Ms. Hagerty stated that Liberty Ride has increased its marketing efforts over the past few years. She stated that increasing transportation costs have been a challenge. One-year contracts have been issued for the past few years with only one bidder response. Joseph’s Transportation, out of Medford, has a bit of a monopoly over the industry at this time, and so they can dictate their prices. The guides for Liberty Ride also need a bit of an increase in wages, as it is not competitive with other similar tour companies. COVID-19 has also caused an impact on services, with Liberty Ride seeing 75% of the tourism visitation numbers as it did in 2018. Prices for tickets are also considered slightly high. Ms. Hagerty stated that there are three options moving forward. One is purchasing an electric trolley using ARPA funding. The second would be to purchase a gas diesel trolley using ARPA funding. The third option would be to lease or contract, as Liberty Ride has done in the past. Each option was evaluated using the previous operating schedule. April through Memorial Day, Liberty Ride runs four tours a day, on the weekends. After Memorial Day, tours run seven days a week, four tours a day. Estimates were made based on 166 days of operation. Regarding the lease option, Liberty Ride would issue an RFP for a new transportation vendor, and the Town would continue to hire guides. Liberty Ride would also hire a part-time in-house coordinator. This option results in a negative approximately $84,000 deficit, due to the high transportation cost associated with contractual services. Regarding the option to purchase a diesel trolley using ARPA funding, the capital cost would be the ARPA diesel trolley, and the Town would hire guides, drivers, and a full-time in-house coordinator. This option would allow a bit more flexibility to explore options such as hop-on/hop-off services and partnering with neighbor communities, as well as offering special seasonal tours. In this scenario, if the capital cost is removed, Liberty Ride would make approximately $26,000 in revenue each year. The third option would be to purchase an electric trolley, using approximately $450,000 of ARPA funds. It would also be recommended to purchase a level three charger, for approximately $40,000. In this scenario, the Town would hire the guides, drivers, and the full-time in-house coordinator. Similar to the diesel trolley option, this option would allow for exploration of other options, due to increased flexibility in schedule. In this option, the Town would potentially be eligible for State and Federal rebates. In the third option, removing the capital costs, Liberty Ride would be making approximately $9,500 in revenue each year. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Ms. Hagerty stated that, if the Town owned its own trolley, there could be the potential to rent it for non-tour events, such as weddings. Regarding the electric trolley option, Ms. Hagerty stated that these have an electric truck chassis to start and then a trolley company would finish off the inside to look just like the current Liberty Ride trolley. The electric trolley would likely be able to run between 105-120 miles, which would fit the current Liberty Ride schedule. Mr. Pato stated that given the state mandate to move to electric vehicles by 2035, the future capital replacement cost in both scenarios should use the same value for an electric vehicle rather than the price of a gas vehicle for the current non-electric model. So, when further examining the projected future capital costs, the net income ends up being almost the same, if not slightly better on the electric than the gas. He agreed that there is a clear nexus regarding this proposal and ARPA funding. In response to a question from Mr. Sandeen, Ms. Hagerty stated that she believes the lead time for a new trolley could be between 6-12 months. The current contract could be extended for one year, or a new RFP could be sought for that time. Mr. Sandeen suggested that grants for electric vehicles be researched. He also noted that a bi-directional level three charging station could create revenue, and this should also be researched. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Ms. Hagerty stated that if the Town owned the trolley, a full- time, year-round coordinator position would be recommended. This person would mostly work on marketing sales, logistics of the trolley, booking charters in the winter for the upcoming spring and fall, and helping with any special events. This person could also help at the Visitor Center. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Ms. Hagerty explained that the trolley would need to be stored at an RV storage facility or in a pop-up garage. There is not currently room at the DPW, especially in the winter, to store the trolley inside. During other seasons it could be parked outside somewhere in Town. In response to a question from Ms. Barry regarding if a smaller trolley was considered, Ms. Hagerty stated that she did receive quotes for smaller electric shuttle buses. Once negative feedback was received from visitors regarding the bus experience, this was eliminated as an option. The negative feedback was partially due to sightlines from the bus and partially due to the ambiance of the trolley itself. Ms. Hai stated that she is strongly supportive this proposal. She believes this is an attractive tourism option. She would like to see additional information regarding costs and the charging station. DOCUMENTS: Presentation - Liberty Ride Trolley Tours 9-19-22, Liberty Ride Survey Results, Tourism Committee Recommendations, Presentation - Liberty Ride Trolley Tours 6. Approve Town Office Building Employee Parking Plan During Police Station Construction Mike Cronin, Director of Public Facilities & Mike McLean, Police Chief Ms. Hai explained that, during the Police Station construction, the Town Office Building parking situation will require alternative parking spaces for Town staff. Mr. Malloy has determined the best location to be the NStar parking lot, as an alternative lot on a first-come, first-served basis. The Town Manager has received a complaint from Jerry Michelson about the use of this parking lot, and a request to consider the Depot Lot for overflow parking for Town staff. Chief McLean explained that the Community Center was reviewed as a location for parking and shuttling for staff. Muzzey was also reviewed, but there are some deed restrictions associated with that location. The final proposal is for some parking behind the Cary building, a few nearby metered spots, and the NStar parking lot. Signs will be put up and staff will be notified of these changes. Mr. Michelson stated that, in his opinion, temporary parking for dedicated Town staff would work best in the Depot Lot, as opposed to the NStar lot. Alternatively, Town staff could be included in the employee parking program, which allows people to park on a first-come first-served basis in either the Depot Lot or the NStar Lot. He sees these options as better than dedicating the entire NStar Lot, which is located 30’ from the front door of five businesses. Ms. Hai agreed that she has concern regarding agreeing to a parking proposal that could negatively impact surrounding businesses. There are a lot of opportunities to receive feedback from the Center Committee, the Parking Management Group, or the Retailer's Association. Mr. Lucente agreed that the Depot Lot might be a better parking location for staff, and he does not want to take away prime parking locations for businesses on Mondays through Fridays. The distance between the Depot Lot to the door of the Town Office buildings is 392’ at the closest, and 580’ at the furthest. Mr. Pato agreed that he would not want to lock out the public from being able to use the charging stations that exist in the NStar Lot. Mr. Michelson showed a potential walking path from the Depot Lot through the bike path, and this seems like a more viable option. Mr. Sandeen and Ms. Barry echoed the previous comments of Board members. Ms. Hai asked for follow-up regarding creating a safer walking path closer to the Town Office building from the bypass. Ms. Barry asked that the signs be removed from the NStar Lot as soon as possible, and staff be instructed to park in the Depot Lot. Ms. Kosnoff suggested that she reach out to the Public Works Director to request that the tow signs be removed. She would like to consult with the Town Manager regarding putting together a revised parking plan before communication is sent out to the employees regarding the parking location. Ms. Barry also requested that staff consult with stakeholders, such as the Retail Association, on this item. Chief McLean noted that it will soon start getting dark quite early, and there may want to be a consideration for lighting near the Depot Lot and onto the bike path. Dawn McKenna, Tourism Committee Chair, noted that she was hoping to be able to speak during the Liberty Ride agenda item, as she has information that could be useful to the Board. Ms. Hai asked Ms. McKenna to submit any information to the office. DOCUMENTS: Town Office Building Parking Plan, Jerry Michelson Memo ADJOURN VOTE: Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to adjourn the meeting at 8:59pm. A true record; Attest: Kristan Patenaude Recording Secretary