Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-08-25-AC-MIN.pdf APPROPRIATION COMMITTEE MEETING THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, 1994 COMPTROLLER'S OFFICE, 7:30 PM Present: P Lapointe, J Pagett, C Coughlin, M Miley, R Leone, R Borghesani, L Peck, J Ryan Absent: M Mairson, R Neumeier Also Present: R White, Town Manager * P Lapointe opened meeting and recognized R White in order to discuss the areas as outlined on the suggested meeting agenda * R White discussed the preliminary revenue projections for fiscal 1996. It is estimated the Lottery revenue will increase by $ 100,000,Education Reform revenue will increase by $ 50,000. There is little room for increases in local revenue. The BOS is reviewing all fees and will recommend adjustments by October 17th in order to be factored into the FY 96 projections. "Free Cash" availability is estimated to be in the area of $ 500,000. It is anticipated the tax levy will increase by approximately $ 1,500,000(allowable 2.5% increase plus projected growth). The net result will yield $ 1,150,000 of net new revenue ($ 1,500,000+100,000+ 50,000-500,000). This increase in revenue will be offset with debt service payments for the bond authorizations passed at the 1994 annual town meeting of approximately $ 800,000.Thereby leaving approximately $ 350,000 to support all increased requests. Preliminary estimated from J Young are in the area of$ 1,700,000 and the Town approximately $ 1,200,000. The BOS at their goal setting session discussed the possibility of an override or trash enterprise fund. BOS will perhaps have public hearings to solicit citizen feedback on the trash issue. * September 26th the BOS will meet jointly with the AC, SC, and CEC * October 3rd Senator Havern will meet with BOS * October 31st BOS to discuss estimated revenue and expense projections for FY 96. * General discussion of the Privatization Committee (PC) and its focus. Stay clear of political issues. Focus seems to be on facilities management. * R White discussed in general terms labor negotiations. He serves as a School Committee member in the area of collective bargaining. The tutors have organized and there are approximately 66 who appear to be eligible for health insurance (minimum of 20 hours per week, state statute). Concern that the cost will completely eliminate the savings recently attained through coalition bargaining. Cost estimated to be in the area of $ 350,000. Similar problem managed in other communities by hiring tutors with a work schedule of less than 20 hours per week. * Town employees to receive a distribution of the 1% appropriated. Distribution has not yet been made. Lower employees will receive something greater than 1% with employees having a higher compensation level receiving no pay increase. Bargaining units will negotiate the 1% allotted. The 1% is considered by some employees as no pay raise and will probably cause long term problems. * R White expects that his budget will go to the printer by December 19th with BOS budget session to take place on Monday and Wednesday evenings commencing on January 4, 1995. * General discussion on privatization by R White. * R Leone discussed privatization, re-engineering, greater service at less cost. Met with J Moynihan who was willing to discuss the issue but discussion was disappointing in that the savings the first year would be lost to unemployment costs. He did however put forth a new plan as to how the work is to be done. R Leone likened the situation to "dysfunctional micro-management". R Leone suggested that a Saturday session be held at which two (2) possible vendors be asked to make a presentation regarding the philosophy in the delivery of their service. * P Lapointe attended a meeting of the PC and suggested that the PC look at the privatization issue more broadly. PC and AC should coordinate their efforts and the AC should remain on the sidelines in a supporting role of the PC. * J Pagett stressed the need to control payroll and benefits costs. School department should control the costs for health insurance for the tutors. Expressed concern the PC will only look at the custodial privatization issue. * C Coughlin concerned that the time constraints will be too much if a recommendation is expected within the next two months( to meet Article 31 intent). * M Miley suggested that community comparisons be made if not already done so. Arlington and Danvers have already privatized the custodial services and would be communities to discuss the issue with. * P Lapointe suggested that the AC state as an agenda item for the September 26th meeting the discussion of alternative service delivery. * R Borghesani discussed regionalization and the fact that we should not drop the concept while discussing privatization. * MOTION to accept minutes of June 13, 1994, UNANIMOUS * MOTION to accept minutes as amended for July 11, 1994, UNANIMOUS * Next meetings scheduled for September 21st, joint meeting with BOS, SC, CEC on September 26th, and October 13th. * P Lapointe briefly discussed the meetings and discussions he has had with both J Young and L Coit (see suggested agenda). * J Pagett discussed the Goal Setting Meeting of the BOS. Discussion was on trash fee, override or the cutting of services. * MOTION to adjourn acmtau25