Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-02-07 SB-min Select Board Meeting February 7, 2022 A remote participation meeting of the Lexington Select Board was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2022 via Zoom remote meeting services. Ms. Hai, Chair; Mr. Lucente; Vice Chair, Mr. Pato, Ms. Barry, and Mr. Sandeen were present, as well as Mr. Malloy, Town Manager; Ms. Axtell, Deputy Town Manager; and Ms. Katzenback, Executive Clerk. PUBLIC COMMENTS Todd Cataldo, 168 Grand Street, asked that the email he sent to the Board be included in the record for this meeting. He stated that there has been no public process on Article 40 and asked the Board to urge the proponents to withdraw or indefinitely postpone the article and come back when it is fully vetted. Marilyn Fenollosa, Community Preservation Committee Chair, correctly reflect the maker of a statement she cited at a previous Select Board meeting regarding Article 10 - Center bathrooms project. She explained to the Board that is was Ms. Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager for Finance who has made the statement assuring that if funds were appropriated for the bathrooms, tennis courts, basketball courts, these would not be torn up until a couple years later, due to the High School construction, not Recreation representative, Lisa Rhodes. SELECT BOARD MEMBER CONCERNS & LIAISON REPORTS 1. Select Board Member Concerns & Liaison Reports Ms. Barry stated that the Lexington Semi-Quincentennial Commission, otherwise known as Lexington250 has launched a logo contest. This logo contest is open to all High School students who reside in or attend school in Lexington This will be a jury contest. First place comes with a stipend of $1,000, and runners up will be awarded $500 and $250, respectively. Information for this contest will be placed on the Town's website. Ms. Barry noted that Minuteman High School is still considered to be in Lexington, and that any students high-school age can apply. Ms. Hai stated that she will be presenting on behalf of the MMA at the Local Government Advisory Council regarding the need for the continuation of remote Town Meeting, remote access, mail-in ballot, th etc., in order to urge both the quick signing and the extension past July 15. Ms. Hai also noted that she attended the COVID PCR test clinic last weekend. There are 250 slots at each of these clinics. There were 80 people signed up last Saturday, and seven of them were no shows. She wondered whether the Board needs to rethink the scheduling of these clinics. TOWN MANAGER REPORT th Mr. Malloy explained that there was a significant flood in the Town Office building on January 29, during the snowstorm. Thanks to the diligence of the Public Facilities Department, IT Department, and all of the staff, most of the repair work will be done by the end of this week. He also noted that the Town has th a new Sustainability and Resilience Officer, Maggie Peard; she will be starting on February 14. In response to a question from Ms. Barry regarding an update on the working group looking at the Article 97 land and land issues surrounding the High School property in the Center Recreation Fields property, Mr. Malloy stated that a framework has been created, and that the time between meetings will be used for the Superintendent, himself, the Recreation Director, the Public Works Director, and the Public Facilities Director to do a lot of leg work with our Town Council. A memo will be created to this effect shortly. Ms. Barry advocated for the working group’s meetings to be held on Zoom, to allow for public attendance and input. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. Malloy stated that the Town is looking into an alarm system that could send an alert if a significant amount of water is entering the building, in hopes of preventing flooding issues in the future. CONSENT AGENDA The Board pulled item #5 for a separate vote. 1. Approve Lexington Little League Opening Day Request To approve the Lexington Little League request for the Annual Little League Parade on Saturday, April 30, 2022 as outlined in their letter dated January 10, 2022 and subject to State and Local COVID-19 requirements at the time of the event. DOCUMENTS: 2022 Little League Parade Request 2. Approve Select Board Meeting Minutes To approve and release the Select Board meeting minutes of: December 13, 2021; December 20, 2021; January 10, 2022 DOCUMENTS: DRAFT Select Board – 12132021, DRAFT Select Board – 12202021, DRAFT Select Board - 01102022 3. Select Board Committee Appointments To appoint the board and committee members with terms as indicated in the attached list (Select Board Committee Appointments - February 7, 2022). DOCUMENTS: Select Board Committee Appointments - February 7, 2022 )(rev 02072022), 2022 Design Advisory Committee Application - E. Xu, 2022 Economic Development Advisory Committee Application - Y. Taylor, 2022 Housing Partnership Board Application - W. Manz, 2022 Lexington Center Committee Application - T.E. Ballard, Jr., 2022 Noise Advisory Committee Application - J. Campbell, 2022 Sustainable Lexington Committee Application - L. Jensen, 2022 Town Celebrations Committee Subcommittee Application - H. Xie, 2022 Zoning Board of Appeals Associates Application - D. Williams, 2022 Zoning Board of Appeals Associates Application - K. Roy 4. Battle Green Use Request – Lexington Minute Men Inc. & Lexington Historical Society To approve the request of Lexington Minute Men Inc. and the Lexington Historical Society to use the Battle Green on Sunday, April 17, 2022 at 10:00pm through Monday, April 18, 2022 at 1:00am for the reenactment of Paul Revere's ride and the arrival of Paul Revere and William Dawes at the Hancock- Clarke House as outlined in the attached letters dated January 17, 2022 and January 24, 2022 and subject to State and Local COVID-19 requirements at the time of the event. DOCUMENTS: 2022 Patriots' Day Event/Battle Green Use Request - Lexington Minute Men Inc., 2022 Patriots' Day Event Request - Lexington Historical Society 6. Battle Green Use Request – William Diamond Junior Fife and Drums Corps To approve the request of the William Diamond Junior Fife and Drum Corps to use the Battle Green on Friday, May 6, 2022 from approximately 7:00pm to 8:00pm for the annual Lexington Fife and Drum Tattoo as part of the Lexington Muster weekend. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the Consent Agenda Items 1-4, and 6. Mr. Lucente recused himself from voting on item #5, as he is a member of Lion’s Club. 5. Battle Green Use Request – Lions Club of Lexington, Inc. To approve the request of the Lions Club of Lexington, Inc. to hold the 108th Annual Patriots' Day 5- Mile Road Race on Monday, April 18, 2022 with an awards ceremony on the Battle Green at the conclusion of the Road Race as outlined in the attached letter dated January 31, 2022 and subject to State and Local COVID-19 requirements at the time of the event. DOCUMENTS: 2022 Patriots' Day Event/Battle Green Use Request - Lions Club of Lexington, Inc. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 4-0 to approve the Consent Agenda Item 5. Mr. Lucente rejoined the meeting. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION 1. Liquor License - Transfer of License and Change of Location - Lex Liquor Inc., 186 Bedford Street Ms. Hai opened this public hearing at 7:17pm. She explained that this license was previously approved following a hearing with public participation and based on resident feedback, the hours on the license are currently limited to Monday - Thursday 8:30am to 10pm, Fridays and Saturdays 8:30am to 11pm, and Sunday noon to seven. Mr. Arthur Perlman, applicant’s counsel, addressed the Board. He explained that the applicant is requesting that all alcoholic beverage licenses currently held by LLAWM- Lexington, LLC be transferred to Lex Liquor Inc, DBA, Lexington, Wine & Spirits, as well as a change of location for that license from Unit 3 to Unit 2 at the same building, 186 Bedford Street. He also requested that the Board consider amending the opening time on Sunday from noon to 10am. In response to a question from Mr. Pato regarding the previous owner’s unique business model and plan for this liquor store, Mr. Perlman stated that the new owners run very nice upscale liquor stores, but he is unclear on the previous plan. Ms. Katzenback explained that the delayed opening til noon on Sunday was a result of neighborhood concerns. Mr. Patel, representing a nearby liquor store located at 55 Bedford Street, expressed concern regarding saturation of the market for this type of store in this location. Ms. Hai stated that she would be making a motion using the same terms and conditions currently applied to this unit, as the previous public hearing had significant public turnout and discussion regarding concern for the operating hours. She closed the public hearing at 7:24pm. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the Lex Liquor, Inc d/b/a Lexington Wine & Spirits application for the transfer of liquor license and change of location of the All Package Store Liquor License at 186 Bedford Street Unit, with the hours of operation to sell alcohol as follows: Monday through Thursday 8:30am - 10:00pm; Friday and Saturday 8:30am - 11:00pm and Sunday 12:00pm - 7:00pm.. DOCUMENTS: Liquor License Transfer and Change of Location application -186 Bedford_Street Unit 2, Copy of required Legal Ad placed for Hearing 2. Liquor License - Change of DBA - 55 Pearl Investment LLC d/b/a Whiskey and Wine Lexington, 55 Bedford Street There were no questions or comments from the public or from the Board. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the 55 Pearl Investment LLC application for a change of D/B/A to amend their All Alcohol Package Store Liquor License to 55 Pearl Investment LLC d/b/a Whiskey & Wine Lexington, 55 Bedford Street. DOCUMENTS: Liquor License Amendment Application for Change of DBA on Liquor License 3. Grant of Location for Verizon - 3 Reed Street Ms. Hai opened the public hearing at 7:27pm. Bill Wallace, representative for Verizon, addressed the Board. He explained that the pole petition was triggered by Eversource to run power to the 186 Bedford Street new construction work. The proposal is to place a new pole at 82-5 A on the southerly side of Reed Street, approximately 75’ northwesterly from the existing pole 82-5, located on the southerly side of Reed Street. Ms. Hai noted that the pole is a customer-driven request. It is not driven from the utility. This is for underground service to 186 Bedford Street and there will be no overhead lines. There were no questions or comments from the public or from the Board. Ms. Hai closed the hearing at 7:30pm. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve a Grant of Location VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC. and NSTAR ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A EVERSOURCE ENERGY to locate poles, wires, cables, and fixtures including the necessary anchors, guys and other such sustaining and protecting fixtures to be owned and used in common by your petitioners, along and across the following public way or ways in the Town of Lexington as follows:  Install one (1) JO pole, P.82/5A on the southerly side of Reed Street at a point approximately 75’ northwesterly from existing pole, P.82/5, located on the southerly side of Reed Street. DOCUMENTS: Verizon Grant of Location Petition, copy of mailed abutters notice Ms. Hai amended the order of the agenda to take up items 6 and 7. 6. Approve the Sale of Bonds and Notes (the Board took up this item at this time) Carolyn Kosnoff, Assistant Town Manager for Finance, addressed the Board. She explained that the sale th of municipal bonds occurred on January 25. There were $16.65M worth of capital projects financed. The biggest piece of this was the Center Streetscape project at approximately $8M. The Town received six competitive bids. The winning bidder offered a par value of $14.495M, which included a premium of 2.32M, resulting in a true interest cost of 1.536%. Robert Baird & Co., Inc. was the low bidder. Moody's Investor Services did rate the bonds, which were once again rated AAA. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 that the sale of the $14,495,000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2022 Bonds of the Town dated February 10, 2022 (the “Bonds”) to Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. at the price of $16,756,424.13 and accrued interest is hereby approved and confirmed. The Bonds shall be payable on February 1 of the years and in the principal amounts and follows bear interest at the respective rates, as Year Amount Interest Rate Year Amount Interest Rate 2023 $1,145,000 5.00% 2030 $1,080,000 5.00% 2024 $1,145,000 5.00% 2031 $1,080,000 5.00% 2025 $1,140,000 5.00% 2032 $1,080,000 5.00% 2026 $1,140,000 5.00% 2034 $1,395,000 3.00% 2027 $1,085,000 5.00% 2036 $1,390,000 2.00% 2028 $1,080,000 5.00% 2037 $655,000 2.00% 2029 $1,080,000 5.00% and further: that the Bonds maturing on February 1, 2034 and February 1, 2036 (each a “Term Bond”) shall be subject to mandatory redemption or mature as follows: Term Bond due February 1, 2034 Year Amount 2033 $700,000 2034* $695,000 _____________ *Final Maturity Term Bond due February 1, 2036 Year Amount 2035 $695,000 2036* $695,000 _____________ *Final Maturity and Further: that in connection with the marketing and sale of the Bonds, the preparation and distribution of a Notice of Sale and Preliminary Official Statement dated January 19, 2022 and a final Official Statement dated January 25, 2022, each in such form as may be approved by the Town Treasurer, be and hereby are ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted. and Further: that any certificates or documents relating to the Bonds (collectively, the “Documents”), may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same document; delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to a Document by electronic mail in a “.pdf” file or by other electronic transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart signature page to such Document; and electronic signatures on any of the Documents shall be deemed original signatures for the purposes of the Documents and all matters relating thereto, having the same legal effect as original signatures. and Further: that the Town Treasurer and the Select Board be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and deliver a continuing disclosure undertaking in compliance with SEC Rule 15c2-12 in such form as may be approved by bond counsel to the Town, which undertaking shall be incorporated by reference in the Bonds, for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds from time to time. and Further: that we authorize and direct the Town Treasurer to establish post issuance federal tax compliance procedures and continuing disclosure procedures in such forms as the Town Treasurer and bond counsel deem sufficient, or if such procedures are currently in place, to review and update said procedures, in order to monitor and maintain the tax-exempt status of the Bonds and to comply with relevant securities laws. and Further: that each member of the Select Board, the Town Clerk and the Town Treasurer be and hereby are, authorized to take any and all such actions, and execute and deliver such certificates, receipts or other documents as may be determined by them, or any of them, to be necessary or convenient to carry into effect the provisions of the foregoing votes. DOCUMENTS: Moody's Press Release, Lexington Bid Results, Lexington Final Bond Structure, Bond Certificate, Tax Certificate, Continuing Disclosure Certificate, No Litigation & OS Statement 7. Approve the FY2023 Recommended Budget and Financing Plan (the Board took up this item at this time) Ms. Kosnoff addressed the Board and reviewed the items in the Board’s packet. The reviewed changes to the General Fund. The Town is projected to get some additional State Aid, however, the revenue offsets also increased, and therefore the net change in State Aid is only a net positive of $4,000. It is believed that the Free Cash number is going to come in much closer to $15.7M, which is actually $1M over what was projected when the revenue allocation model was run in November. She noted that the Sustainable Action Plan, which will come before Town Meeting as an article, will be partly funded with a prior authorization for achieving Net Zero. This leaves $30,000 to be repurposed from it, which is reflected on the revenue side. Ms. Kosnoff explained that the debt service expense was decreased by approximately $800,000 for FY23. The offset of that revenue and the debt service are suggested to be put towards cash capital, leading to an increase in that line of $1.876M. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Ms. Kosnoff explained that there are three outstanding authorizations for Hartwell Avenue. Two of them are related to reconstructing some the roads and bridges. There is approximately $6M outstanding in all bond off debt, authorized projects, however construction on the Hartwell roadway is not slated to begin over the next year, and, therefore, that debt service was removed from the projections. Ms. Kosnoff explained that both the water and wastewater expenses were slightly decreased. She noted that, under Compost Operations, there was a Program Improvement Request to bring a part-time staff member to full-time which was not originally included in the White Book. After conversations with the Department and the Town Manager, it was determined that the increase in salary required to bring that person from part-time to full-time could be covered by the expected fee increase that will be proposed this spring. She explained that part of the bond that the Board just issued was for a piece of equipment related to the compost operations. The intention is to add that debt service and pay for that piece of equipment. The equipment has a bond anticipation note for a four-year debt. Overall, the net change in the compost revolving fund is $70,925. Ms. Kosnoff explained that the Town has been transitioning out free cash from the operating budget at $700,000 per year. This money is being taken out of the operating budget, which is essentially the debt service. The request is to put that money towards cash capital, along with the rest of the free cash. This will allow the Town to largely take all of this year's capital plan items from the general fund, almost all of which will be with cash. The only items that will be left as debt financing are part of the Battle Green Streetscape Project, approximately $800,000 of that can now be funded through cash, with the remainder still funded through debt financing. Also, the Facilities Emergency Fund for the High School, which will only be spent if there is a large emergency at the High School before building construction gets underway, and the feasibility study for the High School. Mr. Malloy addressed the water heater. If the Board opts to go with the oil option, he recommended that the article be left as is. If the Board decides to go with one of the electric options, he recommended that this be put it off to the fall Town Meeting, and that funds be appropriated for the design only at this annual Town Meeting. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Malloy explained that, if the current hot water heater fails during the season, emergency repairs would need to be done. Depending on the necessary repairs, the pool could be closed because there wouldn't be hot water for sinks or showers. Mr. Cronin noted, if there was a failure, the Department would likely replace it with an oil-fired part, in order to keep the pool open for the rest of the season. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. Cronin explained that he has consulted the architects for the price of a full evaluation of all the different options - electric, solar, etc. While he is awaiting a final response, he does not believe the cost will be more than $30,000 which is currently allocated for this project. Mr. Pato stated that he would like to wait and not commit to the oil-fired heater at this time. He echoed a previous comment from Ms. Barry regarding placing solar hot water on the site to augment the input source. Mr. Lucente recommended accepting the existing proposal to replace the water heater. Mr. Sandeen stated that he would like to see the replacement consider sustainable options. He recommended either delaying this item or allocating enough funds to cover all the proposed options and completing an analysis over the summer. Mr. Lamb, Capital Expenditures Committee, explained that the CEC believes that the Town should follow Town Meeting’s direction to move toward sustainable energy choices. He noted that the CEC will likely look at an electric solution with a justification and rational analysis numbers. This article may be amended on the Town Meeting floor for it to be electric or to IP. The CEC would like to see a reasonable analysis completed for this item. Cindy Arens, 7 Kitson Park Drive, stated that she believes solar hot water should be examined for this project. She noted that oil has particulate matter that can be unhealthy for the residents. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. Malloy stated that this type of analysis is something that a Sustainability Director would be completing prior to Board review. Mr. Malloy noted that this position would coordinate with the Public Works Department and the engineer to present the analysis to the Board. Mr. Sandeen recommended that Sustainable Lexington as well as the financial committees should also review this. Ms. Hai stated that there seems to be consensus that some of the projected currently allocated in the budget be converted into the least expensive, most efficient means of analysis for alternative, sustainable options for providing heat for hot water to the facilities at the pool. Mr. Lucente noted that sustainable initiatives are only one in a multitude of factors to be examined, such as cost. He believes the Board would like to see a sustainable option, not oil, for this project. Mr. Pato agreed that not all of the potential sustainable options have been examined for this project and that it is important to do so. Mr. Malloy noted that the figures presented to the Board were compiled by SED Associates, design engineering firm. The group looked at three different types of electric water heaters and provided us a cost by water at the rate of water that needs to be provided at the pool for both the showers and the sinks. The existing system does not meet the health code requirements and needs to be upgraded. Ms. Petite, Director of Recreation, explained that she does not believe the existing hot water heater will fail before Labor Day. She things that this study can be completed in a timely fashion, however due to the age of the water heater, it seemed prudent to examine this project. The pool is a seasonal facility; shutting it down would impact employment, and a lot of things for the community. She believes some of the options being explored could impact usability of the space, due to required expansion of the system. Mr. Lucente stated that he is in favor of replacing the existing system for $32,000. Mr. Pato stated that he is in favor of waiting and studying this further. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. Cronin stated that there is not truly a timeline yet for this project. There isn’t a plan to do this project until after the swim season. Mr. Sandeen stated that he is in favor of waiting and studying this further. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the FY23 recommended Budget Financing Plan, as summarized in the attached program, including changes to the White Book as presented above, to allow staff to make additional non-substantive adjustments and narrative updates in preparation of publishing the final 2023 recommended Budget and Financing Plan, and subject to the change to both the eventual number presented for the hot water heater and changing the purpose of that usage. DOCUMENTS: FY2023 Budget Crosswalk (White Book to Brown Book), Hot Water Heater Analysis, FY2023 Program Summary – Recommended, Brown Book Draft (clean), Brown Book Draft (blackline) 4. Update on Police Station Building Project Mr. Cronin introduced Jeff McElravy, AIA, Principal, and Matt Salad, Project Manager, Tecton Architects. Mr. Salad explained that general contractor bids for the temporary police station were received on January th 27. The group received bids from 10 different general contractors. The estimated budget for construction of the temporary facility was approximately $350,000 and the low bidder came in at $351,100. A letter will be issued to the Town shortly regarding the recommended bidder. Mr. Salad explained that there have been some changes made to the design of the building including a more open and welcoming lobby space, and some more public support spaces. On the second floor, there are additional social services and support spaces, as well as more open office environments for more transparent interaction between the Police Department administrative staff and others. The design now includes an extension of the second floor over a portion of the first floor that didn't have habitable space over it to begin with. The locker rooms have been moved to a back area and a dormer has been added to the rear of the building. He explained that the parking spaces on the site, shown at 164 in the plan, are mostly maxed out. There is an area on site that is currently proposed to hold six parking spaces, but there is debate about moving it and replacing it with green space instead. Mr. Cronin explained that the site of the monopole may need to be revisited due to parking concerns. He noted that he would like the Board to discuss tonight the parking area/green space, the solar aspect, and moving from the design development phase into the construction document phase. Mr. Salad stated that the integration of the solar capacity on site will bring this building to being net zero. He noted that the group is also working to make sure that portions of this project comply with the Living Building Challenge Red List requirements. Mr. McElravy reviewed the history of this project. He explained that the total increase in escalation, additional square footage and line-item adjustments lead to a total increase of $9,286,458 in the overall budget. Mr. Salad reviewed some additional recommendations recently made to the project and potential reductions to lower costs, including reducing landscaping and omitting a high-density storage system for evidence. Mr. McElravy addressed the options for the solar canopy to help the building approach net zero. He noted that one option is parking canopies over the rear parking aisles. Another is a pavilion with solar panels in Fletcher Field. He showed the Board potential design precedents for solar options. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. McElravy stated that the green space projected at Fletcher Field is increased from the current amount. Mr. Salad noted that the current green space is approximately 28,400 s.f., and the proposed is approximately 39,000 s.f., or approximately a 30% increase. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente regarding the projected cost of this building compared to other buildings/towns of similar sizes, Mr. Salad stated that a similar Police Station building in Shrewsbury is almost the same size and has a projected cost of $43-44M. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. McElravy stated that Hosmer House is proposed to be placed on temporary cribbing. It is expected for it to then be moved offsite prior to the installation of solar canopies. The solar canopy structures have not yet been designed and are not included in the projected cost at this time. Mr. Cronin explained that there was a meeting last week with the HDC regarding the demolition permit for the Hosmer House. This was an informal discussion, to be voted on by the group March 3, 2022. The group will also have a conversation regarding placement of the monopole that evening. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. McElravy stated that demolition of the existing Police Station would likely begin in the fall of 2022. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. Cronin stated that the original direction for this project was to make the building solar ready, and not to have the entire solar infrastructure available. This request would be a step beyond what the original direction was. Ms. Barry noted that, while it is aspirational to try to make this building net zero, she does not believe it is stated anywhere that this is required for this project. In response to a question from Mr. Sandeen, Mr. Cronin stated that the monopole is proposed to be 5’ in diameter and 120’ tall. This is a separate project that is being coordinated aesthetically with the Police Station project. Ms. Hai noted that, while separate, it directly influences where the utilities and other critical infrastructure of this building can go. Ms. Barry stated that the Board reviewed the monopole design at its November 1, 2021, meeting, and that there was consensus at that time that the best location for it was behind the building. Mr. Cronin noted that the traffic pattern issue was not anticipated until the actual design for the location of the monopole was considered. Mr. Lucente stated that he believes the monopole should stay behind the building. He is okay with the parking spaces being moved on the site. He believes putting footings in for the solar infrastructure is premature at this time. He feels comfortable moving forward to the construction document phase at this time, although he does not agree with the option to get rid of the garage. Mr. Pato stated that he is okay with eliminating the parking spaces but would like to hear from the Commission on Disabilities regarding handicap access. He is comfortable moving the monopole to a different location, though has a preference for it remaining where originally proposed. He does agree with moving forward with solar planning for this project as part of Town Meeting. He agreed with moving forward to the construction document phase of the project, but echoed Mr. Lucente’s comments about the garage. Ms. Hai agreed with not getting rid of the garage. She likes the aesthetic of reducing parking for green space but is also concerned regarding accessibility. She would like to see if the monopole could be moved to a different location, if possible. She agreed that the project should stay solar ready but that this should be addressed through separation funding. Ms. Barry stated that she would like to see renderings for the alternate placement options for the monopole. She agreed that the Commission on Disability should comment on the proposed parking reduction. She stated that she would like for the Board to be very transparent with the public regarding the potential solar project being proposed. She agreed with moving forward with the construction document phase. Mr. Sandeen echoed comments regarding preferring the green space instead of the parking spaces, and agreed with the importance of checking on handicap access. He wants to be clear with the community regarding the proposed monopole design. He stated that he believes the solar structure is going to be a positive cash flow for the Town, and that it will provide significant benefits for resilience for the Police Station over the long-term. He agreed with moving forward with the construction document phase. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to authorize the architect and Public Facilities Director to move forward to construction documents on the Lexington Police Department building project. DOCUMENTS: Presentation on Lexington Police Headquarters Project - Update from Tecton Architects The Board took a brief recess from 10:00 PM to 10:05 PM. Ms. Hai stated that a number of items left on the agenda will be pushed to next week’s meeting, due to lateness of the hour. She noted that the Board will discuss only the consent agenda regarding Annual Town Meeting, and that the other items will be discussed next week. 5. 2022 Annual Town Meeting & Special Town Meeting 2022-1 Due to lateness of the hour, Ms. Hai noted that the Board will only discuss the consent agenda regarding for this Town Meeting item. Mr. Lucente noted that he will be recusing himself from Article 10. Mr. Pato asked that Article 30 be removed from the consent agenda. Ms. Hai stated that the Board will review the consent agenda again after it has been reviewed by the finance committees, CPC, and the moderator. The Board delayed discussion of all other topics for this agenda item to the next meeting.  Presentation - ATM 2022 Article 31: Amend General Bylaws - Reporting, Disclosing, and Assessing the Energy and Water Use of Large Buildings  Presentation - ATM 2022 Article 26: Appropriate for Nexus Studies (Citizen Petition)  Discuss Potential Select Board Report  Select Board Article Presenters, Discussion & Positions DOCUMENTS: Art31BEU-Dpresentation, Art31BEU-Dmotion, STM- 2022-1Art 2 Police construction, Art 26 Nexus studies presentation, Art 26 Motion Nexus studies, 2022ATM, STM 2022-1 Select Board Position Worksheet, Proposed consent agenda draft, Copy of 2021 Select Board Report to Annual Town Meeting, Copy of Scribes for Last Year's 2021 SB Report to Town Meeting 8. Approve Extension Request for Commercial Use of Town Property Post-COVID Ms. Hai stated that the agrees with the extension and also would like for Mr. Malloy to have signatory authority to make the process more expeditious and efficient. Mr. Pato endorsed the proposed changes but stated that he would like to see this also apply to private commercial properties. Mr. Lucente also agreed with these changes and asked that the Board continue to be updated on permits filed. Ms. Barry agreed with the changes but noted that she wants to make sure this doesn’t conflict with any of the other regulatory boards in terms of their guidelines or bylaws. Mr. Malloy stated that he will contact these boards to double check on this. Mr. Sandeen also voiced his support as long as the facilities are compliant with other town regulations. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to authorize the Town Manager to approve outdoor dining/alcohol service, and further to authorize the Town Manager to serve as the Deputy Liquor Licensing Authority for outdoor dining/alcohol service. Ms. Hai noted that the item regarding extending this to private commercial properties will be on the Board’s next consent agenda. 9. Review and Approve the Creation of the Lexington Cultural District Steve Poltorzycki addressed the Board. He explained that this request is to move forward with the cultural district application and appoint a Town official to represent the town in the Cultural District Managing Partnership meetings. The Managing Partnership is the entity that was created to manage the cultural districts. The request is also that the Town Treasurer's Office cane handle the money, approximately $7,500 a year that the State grants to each cultural district. In response to a question from Mr. Pato, Ms. Iyer stated that there is an intention for diversity and inclusion to be considered as part of this. The plan is to have the application done by March 2022. Mr. Pato stated that he would like to see this adequately addressed by a presentation in the future. Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to approve the resolution as attached, with the indication of Ms. Iyer as the municipal designee. DOCUMENTS: Cultural District Agreement, Cultural District Resolution 10. Conflict of Interest Determination: Pamela Shadley - Lexington Center Committee Ms. Hai explained that this item is for clarification on whether or not Ms. Shadley can recuse herself as a Lexington Center Committee member and then participate in a Lexington Center Committee meeting in her capacity as a paid consultant of Jacobs Engineering, regarding the Lexington parking lot project. She is looking to be able to present to the Center Committee in her capacity as a consultant, and she has recused on this topic from the Committee. Mr. Pato stated that this is a question for an ethics attorney from the State Ethics Board. Ms. Barry suggested that either Mr. Makarios submit information regarding this item to the Board for its next meeting, or Ms. Shadley address this with the State Ethics Board. DOCUMENTS: Letter of Request for Waiver of Conflict of Interest 11. Discussion on Parking Meters Mr. Malloy explained that the proposal is to consider having cash/PaybyPhone as the two options for paying for parking, as opposed to cash/credit cards. The cash/PaybyPhone option would negate the need to update to 4G. The cost of PaybyPhone is passed on to the consumer (15%), however, this is not the case for credit card users. In order to be consistent, the other proposal recommended is that we adjust the meter costs for credit cards to be consistent with the PaybyPhone app costs. In response to a question from Ms. Hai, Mr. Malloy stated that everyone seems to be using the PaybyPhone app and there haven’t been a large number of violations. In response to a question from Mr. Lucente, Mr. Malloy stated that this proposal includes all of the meters on Mass Ave and in the parking lots, as well as those along some of the other side streets. There are 208 meters that need the repair alone, at $205 apiece. There are 321 parking meters that need the repair and the upgrade. Ms. Barry requested that data be compiled to determine how many seniors are using their parking stickers. Mr. Sandeen stated that he prefers the repair only and PaybyPhone option. Mr. Pato agreed with the PaybyPhone option, as long as there is nothing specific that will need the 4G update. Ms. Hai also agreed with this option, and echoed Mr. Pato’s comments. Mr. Lucente asked that members of the Center Committee be allowed to comment on this. In response to a question from Ms. Barry, Mr. Malloy stated that there will be custom stickers for the PaybyPhone option added to the meters to cover certain existing slots. Ms. Sandler stated that the only feedback received regarding the PaybyPhone option has been negative. Mr. Michelson stated that people should be given 2-3 options at the meters, including using a credit card. He believes there may be a need to upgrade to 4G with these meters, and thus the credit card option should continue to be included. DOCUMENTS: 4GUpgradeCostAnalysis ADOURN Upon a motion duly made and seconded, by roll call, the Select Board voted 5-0 to adjourn the meeting at 10:44 p.m. A true record; Attest: Kristan Patenaude Recording Secretary