HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-02-09-TAC-min Transportation Advisory Committee
Lexington, Massachusetts
Draft minutes for the meeting of Tuesday, February 9th, 2021. The meeting was
held remotely pursuant to Governor Baker's March 12, 2020 order suspending
provisions of the Open Meeting Law, G. L. c. 30A, section 18, and subsequent
orders imposing strict limitations on the number of people who may gather in one
place.
Members present: Sally Castleman (chair), Sara Arnold, Vinita Verma, Pamela
Lyons, Elaine Dratch, Andra Bennett
Liaisons: Sudhir Jain, Council on Aging, Shefali Verma, Lexington High School
Also: Susan Barrett(Transportation Manager), Robert Gulick, Conan, Michelle
Ciccolo (State Representative), Leonard Morse-Fortier
The chair called the meeting to order at 7:06 pm.
Voted to pass the January minutes (6-0).
Sally announced a first meeting for joint staff, committee liaisons from
departments with transportation interests. Here TAC will kick-off an initiative to
collaborate on transportation issues across Lexington Town departments
(Sustainability, Safet etc).
Ms. Ciccolo gave an overview for a bill she had been working on regarding
transportation improvement districts. The goal for the bill is to provide an avenue
for long-term planning for shuttle programs. The bill didn't pass, but it received
funding for a study and there is continued interest to pursue it in the next
legislative session. The motivation for this bill is recognizing that there are
underserved areas that could benefit from a pooled approach to organizing a
shuttle service. Transportation improvement districts (TID) would be modeled
closely after the Business Improvement Districts and would allow property
owners, municipalities and the state to fully organize a transportation offering.
TIDs are a transportation-focused, non profit 503c organization. The bill
proposed by Ms. Ciccolo outlines the legal grounds and funding vehicles that
would allow municipalities and property owners to organize a publicly accessible
shuttle program. TID formation would be approved based on full planning around
routes, operations details, frequencies. Financial plan, marketing costs, fee
structures would have to be fully accounted for. The management and planning of
this program would be completely independent and flexible to self-organization
(it could be a special committee similar to TAC, or perhaps left up to a branch of
the municipality e.g. DPW).
Funding would be shared across the three stakeholders - property owners,
municipalities and state. A nominal and affordable fee for actual riders would be
targeted. It is generally believed the co-ownership model of this structure would
provide a great incentive to join. Approval process requires 51% of votes from
properties targeted towards the fee structure.
Ms. Ciccolo informed TAC that she intends to use the existing REV program
in Lexington as one of the pilot programs for this type of proposal (based on prior
success of the REV).
A few different perspectives around this bill and how this type of bill might impact
existing programs were discussed.
• Inclusivity. This could take the form of a private shuttle might exclude
certain riders (e.g. those whose government employer doesn't subsidize
private shuttles). Competing against existing MBTA routes might drive away
service from more affordable, farther-reaching services.
• Flexible regarding targeting or exclusion of residential and commercial
areas.
• Length of program would provide the necessary continuity for the program
to really take off. Bill is addressing this through the minimum 3 year
requirement for running the program, yet the comment was mostly
reflective on the benefits of a more permanent solution (such as rail).
The conversation turned towards other items of the agenda, such as parking
stickers and special allowances for seniors. Special accommodations for
accessibility of parking meters is the main interest of the Council of Aging group,
yet multiple voices in the meeting pointed out and agreed that age should not be
the absolute waiver for parking services. Seniors already receive free Lexpress
service during the day, and the age/income difference is far from being fully
correlated in Lexington. Need-based parking stickers may be a happier medium.
The next TAC meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 9th, at 7 pm.
The meeting ended at 9:13 pm.