HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-23-ZBA-min
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
January 23, 2014
Board Members Present: Chairman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D.
McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and Associate Member Carolyn C. Wilson
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Address: 409 Massachusetts Avenue, Map 21, Lot 11 and 12
Due to a scheduling conflict, the petitioners, John C. Bartenstein and Donna requested
to continue the hearing until Thursday, February 27, 2014.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeney and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger, the Board
voted, 4-1 to continue the hearing until February 27, 2014 at 7:30 pm. Edward D.
McCarthy voted in opposition to the vote.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeney and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger, the Board
voted, 5-0 to waive the constructive grant deadline until 45 days after the conclusion of
the continued hearing.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk
BOA Meeting January 23, 2014 2
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
January 23, 2014
Board Members Present: Chairman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D.
McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and Associate Member Carolyn C. Wilson
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Address: 85 Reed Street, Map 72, Lot 498
The petitioner, Attorney Pamela Brown, requested the hearing be continued until
February 13, 2014 to give them the opportunity to go before the Conservation
th
Commission on January 28.
On a motion by Edward D. McCarthy and seconded by Leo P. McSweeney, the Board
voted 5-0 to continue the hearing until February 13, 2014 at 7:30 pm.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk
BOA Meeting January 23, 2014 3
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
January 23, 2014
Board Members Present: Chairman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D.
McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and Associate Member Carolyn C. Wilson
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Address: 0 Moreland Avenue, Map 15, Lot 5 - and
30 Moreland Avenue, Map 15, Lot 4
At the request of the petitioner and with the approval of the Board the applications for
0 Moreland and 30 Moreland were heard together. The Chairwoman opened the
hearing by reading the legal notices and described information received from the
petitioner for both parcels.
The petitioner submitted the following information with the applications: nature and
justification of request; topographic plan; plot plan; elevations; state from Maria E.
Frattura, copy of tax bills for both parcels, quick deed; assessor’s plan, summary
analysis of new construction in the neighborhood; petition of support signed by 27
abutters and an e-mail from Attorney Edmund Grant dated January 22, 2014 regarding
agreement with Harold and Sandra Miller-Jacobs and contractor Joel Werrick; letter
from Attorney Grant responding to a letter from the Planning Board in opposition..
Prior to the hearing, the petitions and supporting data were reviewed by the Acting
Building Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Board of
Selectmen, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Director, the Economic
Development Administrator and the Historic Districts Commission Clerk. Comments
were received from the Planning Board and the Zoning Administrator.
A letter of concern was received from Diane Rubin of 23 Moreland Avenue.
The petitioner is requesting the following variances in accordance with the Zoning By-
Law (Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) section 135-4.5, Table 2, Schedule of
Dimensional Controls for the following relief:
For 0 Moreland Avenue: 2 Variances to allow 1) A lot size of 10, 200 sq. ft. instead of
the required 15,500 sq ft.; and 2) A frontage of 60 ft. instead of the required 125 ft.
frontage.
For 30 Moreland Avenue: 4 Variances to allow 1) A lot size of 11,746 sq. ft. instead of
the required 15,500 sq. ft; 2) Frontage of 91.8 ft. instead of the required 125 ft.; 3 & 4)
2-side yard setbacks of 12 ft. instead of the rqeuired 15 ft. side yard setbacks.
BOA Meeting January 23, 2014 4
Attorney Edmund Grant presented the petition for the owner, Mary and Aurel Frattura.
With Attorney Grant was Mary and Aurel Frattura, contractor Joel Werrick, who is
purchasing the property from the Frattura’s and realtor Kristen Brown.
The applicant seeks to 1) formally divide the lots; 2) Construct a new house on the
vacant lot; and 3) demolish the existing house and construct a new dwelling with
reduced left and right –side yard setbacks.
A Board member asked if there were plans to finish the basement. (At his time there
are no plans to finish the basement.)
One of the Board members commented on the square footage of houses on the Street
are much smaller. (Kristin Brown had done a report for them with the square footage
of the homes on Moreland Avenue.) He had also questioned and commented on the
accessed value of the vacant lot.
The Board member expressed a concern for the size of the home and commented if
the contractor changed the shape of the house they would not need the variances.
Joel Werrick answered could be done, practically and economically would not be
realistic. He must get a certain square footage would be minimize back yard and
closer to the neighbors
Asked to confirm the sq. ft of the homes
The following abutters had questions and concerns for the petitions:
1) Alexandra Elliott of 24 Swan Lane questioned a denial the owners had received
for a garage on the property.
2) Carolyn Baltzer of 7 Rockville Avenue had concern for green space and was
concern with 2 homes verses 1 home on the 2 lots changing the look of the
neighborhood.
3) Terry Rosica of 17 Rockville Avenue, new to Lexington moving from Los
Angeles, was also concerned with 2 homes changing the character
neighborhood that attracted her to Lexington.
4) Louis and Carol Zaczkiewicz of 28 Moreland Avenue presented a written letter
and photographs and are requesting the Board to maintain the setbacks as they
are required in the Lexington By-Laws.
5) Phil Stevens of 25 Swan Lane also moved to the neighborhood because of the
picturesque neighborhood and green space. Mr. Stevens also commented on
the amount of tax being paid for that extra lot.
6) Charles Hornig, Chairman of the Planning Board spoke of the Boards letter sent
to the ZBA in opposition to the petitions.
BOA Meeting January 23, 2014 5
The following abutters spoke in support of the petition:
1) Mart Ojama of 11 Swan Lane has no problem with having 2 houses on these
lots and really does not have an issue with the variances they are asking for.
He has an issue with a home that enclosed his yard with a 6 foot white plastic
fence that he found more offensive than the 2 homes on the 2 lots.
2) David Crafts of 29 Moreland Avenue listened to Attorney Grant give the
sequence of events that set-up the structure of the 2 separate lots which seems
to be the way it should be. He appreciates the neighbors concern for green
space but basically they are talking about a variance of 2 feet.
3) Don Schomer of 35 Moreland Avenue spoke of the size of the homes in the
neighborhood and the proposed homes are keeping within the size of the new
homes in the area. He is in support the division of the lots.
Attorney Grant spoke of the concerns of the neighbors. The proposed lots are
consistent with the standard lots in the neighborhood and do fit in with the
neighborhood.
Attorney Grant addressed the hardship as both the shape of the lot and a financial
hardship.
The Chairwoman closed the hearing.
The Board discussed a memorandum that was sent regarding screening and plantings
between the proposed new homes and the Miller-Jacobs home.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeny and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger the Board
voted 5-0 to approve 2 Variances in accordance with the Zoning By-Law (Chapter 135
of the Code of Lexington) section 135-4.5, Table 2, Schedule of Dimensional Controls
to allow 1) A lot size of 10, 200 sq. ft. instead of the required 15,500 sq ft.; and 2) A
frontage of 60 ft. instead of the required 125 ft. frontage with the condition that there is
vegetation screening along the rear of the property lot line for 0 Moreland Avenue.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeny and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger the Board
voted 5-0 to approve 2 Variances in accordance with the Zoning By-Law (Chapter 135
of the Code of Lexington) section 135-4.5, Table 2, Schedule of Dimensional Controls
to allow 2 Variances to allow 1) A lot size of 11,746 sq. ft. instead of the required
15,500 sq. ft; 2) Frontage of 91.8 ft. instead of the required 125 ft.with the condition
that there be a vegetative screening at the rear of the lot for 30 Moreland Avenue; and
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeny and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger the Board
voted 2-3 (Jeanne and Leo in favor) to approve 2 Variances in accordance with the
Zoning By-Law (Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) section 135-4.5, Table 2,
Schedule of Dimensional Controls to allow 2-side yard setbacks of 12 ft. instead of the
rquired 15 ft. side yard setbacks with the condition be a vegetative screening at the
rear of the lot for 30 Moreland Avenue.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk
BOA Meeting January 23, 2014 6
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
January 23, 2014
Board Members Present: Chairman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D.
McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and Associate Member Carolyn C. Wilson
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
OTHER BUSINESS:
1) Minutes of January 9, 2014 have not been completed; therefore there was not
vote on minutes.
2) Mr. Charles Hornig, Chairman of the Planning Commission, came before the
Board to discuss 3 articles on the warrant for changes to the Lexington By-Laws
that will be brought before the Town Meeting:
The first item is the registered marijuana dispensaries. The Planning
Boards’ position is to permit the growing and production in the CM
District, primarily along the Hartwell Avenue area and to permit the
distribution in the CRS, CB, retail districts. They are proposing this to
the Town Meeting now but feel they are many years from anyone
receiving the required state licensing permission for this.
The second change they are proposing is the development standards for
uses and structures for more than 10,000 sq. ft. Currently any use or
structure over 10,000 sq. ft. requires a special permit. The feeling of the
Planning Board is that the original intent was the site plan review was
what was most important and the only process available at the time was
the special permit with site plan review. They do not feel it is
appropriate not to have it as a by right and with reasonable conditions if
needed. Site plan review is more appropriate for this. Just because
something is over 10,000 won’t put it into a special permit range. Faster
time frame for approval than a special permit. If something needs a site
plan review the Planning Board will become SPGA for any other permits
required for the project so that the applicant would only need to go
before one board.
The third item would be 3 pages of technical corrections that clarify
language, fix typos and alphabetize the definitions. Mr. Hornig will fax
over to the Board the list of changes for their review.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeney and seconded by Jeanne K. Krieger, the meeting
was adjourned.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk