HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-11-14-ZBA Minutes
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
November 14, 2013
Board Members Present: Chairman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D.
McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and David G. Williams
Also present at this hearing were Associate Members: Ralph D. Clifford, Nancy M.
Adler and Richard A. Michelson.
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Address: 6 Hudson Road, Map 25, Lot 223
The petitioner submitted the following information with the applications: nature and
justification of request; a topographic plan; a plot plan; shed specifications and a
request for a waiver from the certified plot plan.
Prior to the hearing, the petitions and supporting data were reviewed by the Acting
Building Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Board of
Selectmen, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Director and the Historic Districts
Commission Clerk. Comments were received from the Zoning Administrator.
The Chairman opened the hearings by reading the legal notices and described
information received from the petitioner.
SPECIAL PERMIT
The petitioner is requesting a in accordance with the Zoning By-
Law (Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) section 135-8.4.2 and section 135-9.4.2
to allow an increase in a nonconforming nature.
Christopher Anderson, owner of the property, presented the petition.
A Board member asked why they need the shed, why not use their garage. (The
applicant responded with 3 boys they have a lot of toys, equipment, etc.)
A member thought the applicant had a clear case for needing a shed, her question
was directed to the Zoning Administrator. Could the Board condition the special permit
to the current owner only?
There were numerous questions from the Board as to where the shed could be located
on the property and for storning alternatives other than a shed. There was concern
with the shed being placed close to the abutter’s property and being intrusive as you
come down Munroe Street.
Mark Duffy of 46 Spring Street asked the Board to explain what non-conforming meant
and how did it relate to the shed.
BOA Meeting November 14, 2013 2
Keith Lehman of 4 Hudson spoke in favor of the petition and spoke of discussing and
agreeing with Mr. Anderson as to the best place for the shed to be placed.
Mark Duffy of 46 Spring Street spoke in opposition to the petition.
The Chairman closed the hearing and reopened it to further discuss the location of the
shed.
After much discussion it was decided the hearing would be continued until December
12, 2013 at 7:30 pm to give Mr. Anderson time to speak with his abutters regarding
possible other locations for the shed and to stake out the sites for the Boards review.
On a motion by Jeanne K. Krieger and seconded by Leo P. McSweeney, the Board
voted 5-0 to continue the hearing until December 12, 2013 at 7:30 pm.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk
BOA Meeting November 14, 2013 3
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
November 14, 2013
Board Members Present: Acting on the petition was Chairwoman – Martha C. Wood,
Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward D. McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and David G. Williams
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Also present at this hearing were Associate Members: Ralph D. Clifford, Nancy M.
Adler and Richard A. Michelson.
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
Address: 5 Summit Road, Map 22, Lot 159
The petitioner submitted the following information with the applications: nature and
justification of request; a plot plan; elevations; floor plans; and an addendum to the
application dated October 30, 2013.
Prior to the hearing, the petitions and supporting data were reviewed by the Acting
Building Commissioner, Conservation Administrator, Town Engineer, Board of
Selectmen, the Zoning Administrator, the Planning Director and the Historic Districts
Commission Clerk. Comments were received from the Zoning Administrator.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the legal notices and described
information received from the petitioner.
The petitioner is requesting SPECIAL PERMIT in accordance with the Zoning By-Law
(Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) section 135-8.4.2 and section 135-9.4.2 to
allow an increase in a nonconforming nature.
Mike Stevens, owner of the property, presented the petition.
A Board member asked for a clarification for the setback. (The overhang is extending
into the setback, the walls are not changing.)
The applicant was also asked to explain the drainage and if there was a second floor
on the garage what will and be used for. (Explained drainage and there is an attic to
the garage with pull down stairs for storage.
Barry Orenstein of 132 Follen Street and Laura Lewis of 9 Summit Road spoke in
favor of the project.
BOA Meeting November 14, 2013 4
Eirik Lawson Gude of 3 Summit Road spoke in favor as long as none of the runoff
goes into his property.
No one spoke in opposition to the petition.
The Chairman closed the hearing.
On a motion by Leo P. McSweeney and seconded by Edward D. McCarthy, the Board
voted 5-0 to grant a SPECIAL PERMIT in accordance with the Zoning By-Law
(Chapter 135 of the Code of Lexington) section 135-8.4.2 and section 135-9.4.2 to
allow an increase in a nonconforming nature.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk
BOA Meeting November 14, 2013 5
Minutes of the Lexington Zoning Board of Appeals
Selectmen’s Meeting Room
November 14, 2013
Board Members Present: Chairwoman – Martha C. Wood, Jeanne K. Krieger, Edward
D. McCarthy, Leo P. McSweeney and David G. Williams
Also present at this meeting were Associate Members: Ralph D. Clifford, Nancy M.
Adler and Richard A. Michelson.
Staff Present: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk and David George, Zoning
Administrator
OTHER BUSINESS:
1) The Chairwoman opened up a general discussion on ZBA Business Operations
by asking the Associate Members how they felt they were oriented into the
Board and if there were things that they would like to see addressed.
One of the Associates had commented that they felt very alone with the process
and wasn’t sure what was expected of them on the Board. Would like to see a
mentoring program put into place for new Associates. Others didn’t have any
issues, felt things were going well.
Chairwoman asked what the Associates thought of the possibility of having one
of the Associates attend each meeting as an extra member of the Board. They
would receive the information on the hearing before hand to review, sit in on the
presentation, would be able to ask questions but would not vote on the
decision.
One of the Associates was not in favor of it as he thought there is a lot of work
involved in getting ready for a hearing and was not sure how much he would
participate in it. Two of the Associates attending this meeting were in favor of it
as long as it wasn’t a mandatory situation.
Discussion followed and it was agreed that for 3 months starting in January we
would have 1 Associate attend each meeting to see if it was beneficial. We
would revisit it in 3 months. We will set up a schedule for volunteers to attend
the meetings.
2) Charles Hornig, Chairman of the Planning Board spoke to the Board regarding
communications between the Boards and sharing of information of the New By-
BOA Meeting November 14, 2013 6
Laws and felt that if the two Boards were able to discuss some of the By-Law
changes the ZBA would understand the intent of the changes.
The Chairman felt that if a Board or Committee sends a letter to the ZBA
regarding a hearing it would be helpful for them to attend a meeting to explain
their concerns.
Some of the ZBA members would like to see the Planning Board agenda’s.
3) The Board and Associates had a discussion of changing the meeting time to
7:00 or 7:15 pm. After much debate it was decided to leave the time of the
meeting at 7:30 pm and we will revisit it again in a year.
4) On a motion by Jeanne K. Krieger and seconded by Leo P. McSweeney the
Board voted to approve the minutes of October 24, 2013.
5) On a motion by Jeanne K. Krieger and seconded by Leo P. McSweeney the
meeting was adjourned.
Submitted by: Dianne Cornaro, Administrative Clerk