HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 NOV STM CEC Rpt CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE
TOWN OF LEXINGTON
-v5 M�R�►�gr
w
i r
c�
_ in z �A
APRIL 191.
L�xjNG���
REPORT TO THE
2013 SPECIAL TOWN MEETING (STM)
November 4, 2013
Released October 28, 2013
Submitted by:
Jill L Hai, Chair
David G. Kanter, Vice-Chair
Bill Hurley
Wendy Manz
Beth Masterman
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
Warrant Article Analysis and Recommendations
CPF= Community Preservation Fund,- GF= General Fund,- SF=Stabilization Fund
Fund
Authorization Funding Source Committee Recommends
Article 2:Amend FY2014 Requested
Operating, Enterprise Approval(5-0) if any
Fund and Community State's Community actions are proposed to
Preservation Budgets TBD Preservation Trust increase the State-
Fund(CPTF) supplement amount in the
Community Preservation
Budget(See below)
"To see if the Town will vote to make supplementary appropriations, to be used in conjunction with
money appropriated under Articles 4, 5 and 8 of the warrant for the 2013 Annual Town Meeting [ATM],
to be used during the current fiscal year, or make any other adjustments to the current fiscal year budgets
and appropriations that may be necessary; to determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax
levy, by transfer from available funds, from Community Preservation funds or by any combination of
these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereto." [Town Warrant]
This Committee would only report if there were any actions to the Community Preservation Budget
(CPB).
It is expected that this year's State supplement to the Town's CPF will be materially more than the
$961,957 that was estimated when our fiscal-year (FY) 2014 CPB was approved. There are three factors
that warrant that expectation:
(1) To the extent the State ended FY2013 with some surplus—which is the usual case—up to
$25 million will be added to the State's CPTF from which the distributions, using a formula, are made to
the municipalities that had adopted the Community Preservation Act (CPA). (For more details on the
State Legislative action on this provision, see this Committee's Report to the 2013 ATM, released
March 25, 2013, page 6.) To put that potential addition in perspective, last-year's distribution to those
municipalities was made from the CPTF when its balance was just under $30 million; therefore, another
$25 million would be about an 83% increase to the balance that was then available for distribution. (As
there is a formula involved, the percentage change in Lexington's amount is not necessarily the same as
the change in the CPTF balance.)
(2)Using the latest report from the State's Department of Revenue—its September 2013 "Blue
Book"—on the collections of Registeries of Deeds fees which funds the CPTF, this trust-fund-year's
collections are, in the aggregate, running nearly$1.7 million(5.8%)above the prior year's.
(3) In conjunction with the State Legislative action to provide for the up-to-$25 million addition,
the annual distribution date was made one month later(now to be not later than 15 November) to permit a
determination of what was any prior-FY State surplus and move any addition into the CPTF. Therefore, it
is expected, based on informal information from the State's Department of Revenue, that this year's
distribution will include the CPTF having received an additional (13th) month of collections of the fees.
That may provide an additional$2 million(or more) toward that CPTF balance.
As the actual distribution of this year's supplement is expected to be after this Town Meeting has
dissolved, whether there will be an action under this Article to include the additional revenue to the
Town's CPB—with 10% into each of the specific reserves (Open Space/Recreation, Historic Resources,
& Community Housing) and the balance into the unbudgeted reserve—will be based on whether the
distribution amount is known before then. If it isn't, that doesn't affect the Town's receipt of the
supplement; it only means any increase over the supplement amount include in the CPB would not be
available for appropriation until a Town Meeting in FY2015 (or later).
1
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
Fund Funding
Article 3:Appropriate To Authorization Committee Recommends
and From Specified Requested Source
Stabilization Funds
See Below See Below Approval (5-0)
"To see if the Town will vote to appropriate sums of money to and from Stabilization Funds in
accordance with Section 5B of Chapter 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws for the purposes of. ...(b)
Traffic Mitigation...0) Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserve/Building Renewal Fund..." [Town
Warrant]
Note: All of the Town's Specified Stabilization Funds are in addition to the Town's General
Stabilization Fund See Appendix A for a table with information on all the current Specified
Stabilization Funds.
The Traffic Mitigation Fund and the Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserve/Building Renewal Fund are
the only ones of the Specified Stablization Funds identified in this Article that have capital implications
and for which an appropriation is contemplated at this STM.
Project Description Amount Funding Source Committee Recommends
Requested
(b) Traffic Mitigation Fund $28,500.01 Cubist Approval(5-0)
Pharmaceuticals
These are funds that were paid by that company to the Town in conjunction with a condition of a Special
Permit granted by the Town.
Project Description Amount Funding Source Committee Recommends
Requested
0) Capital Projects/Debt Service $1,799,240 GF (Cash) Approval (5-0)
Reserve/Building Renewal Fund
This appropriation is to increase the balance in that Fund from unallocated FY2014 revenue as follows:
Source(FY2014) Amount
Revenue available for appropriation at close of 2013 ATM $103,556
Preliminary additional new-growth estimate $709,000
Increased revenue in final Cherry Sheets $791,660
Reduction of assessments in final Cherry Sheets $36,068
Unused set-aside for potential FY2013 snow&ice deficit 5300,000
Total Available 51,940,284
Supplement GF Appropriations under Article 2 (S1411044
Balance of Net Unallocated Revenue $1,799,240
The current plan is that that balance, along with a portion of the current balance in that Fund, would be
used for incremental appropriation from that Fund by the 2014, 2015, & 2016 ATMs to continue the
previous mitigation of the exempt-debt service ($1,600,000 will be applied in FY2014) and the new
2
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
mitigation of the non-exempt debt service for the Modular Classrooms at the High School whose
authorization is being requested under Article 4 at this STM. The following table reflects the effect if all
those set-asides are ultimately appropriated.
Projected Balances in the Capital Projects/Debt Service
Reserve/Building Renewal Fund
Current $2,186,566
Proposed Addition at this STM S1,799,240
New Balance $3,985,806
Previously-Planned Future Set-Aside:
Mitigation of FY2015 Exempt-Debt Service (5950,000)
Net Balance Before New Set-Asides $3,035,806
Proposed Set-Asides Toward Article 4 Debt Service
Mitigation of FY2015 Non-Exempt Debt Service ($928,500)
Mitigation of FY2016 Non-Exempt Debt Service ($1,078,000)
Mitigation of FY2017 Non-Exempt Debt Service ($805,496)
Sum of New Set Asides ($2,811,996)
Net Balance After New Set Asides $223,810
Those proposed set-asides for the non-exempt debt service for the Article 4 project are the result of a
financing modeling that was developed with the objective of staying within the Town's goal that the
annual increase in the Town's overall non-exempt debt service not exceed 5%. (That would include
already authorized debt, an annual amount for each year's other capital projects based on the average of
recent years, and the new debt service for the Article 4 project.)
The result is to use debt (presumed to be 10-year bonds at 4% interest) to finance the total estimated
amount of that project and then—subject to approvals at the 2014, 2015, & 2016 ATMs—appropriate
those amounts in the previous table from the Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserve/Building Renewal
Stabilization Fund to mitigate non-exempt debt service in each of those years. With those off-sets, that
model predicts the increase in each of FY2015–FY2017 will be 5.0%—meeting the goal. (The 2014 ATM
also would be asked to appropriate the indicated offset to the exempt debt service.)
The Committee notes that the Capital Projects/Debt Service Reserve/Building Renewal Fund was
established by Special Town Meeting (November 19, 2012) to provide funding toward two classes of
capital projects and/or the debt service on such projects. The expectation at that time was that the initial
appropriations into that new Fund would be used to offset taxpayer impact of the impending spike of the
Town's overall exempt-debt service; and all appropriation, to date, from the Fund have been soley for that
purpose.
While the Committee unanimously endorses the appropriation into that Fund of the balance of net
unallocated FY2014 revenue for later use to mitigate the impact of the non-exempt debt associated with
the Modular Classrooms at the High School, we urge that additional funds be allocated to that Fund so
that it also may be used to support the other two stated purposes: Capital Projects and Building
Renewal—both of which needs the Committee recognizes and supports.
3
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
Fund Funding
Article 4:Appropriate for Authorization Committee Recommends
Modular Classrooms at Requested Source
the High School $7,700,000 GF(Debt) Approval (5-0)
"This article would fund the purchase and installation of a number of modular classrooms at the High
School to alleviate overcrowding in the existing classrooms." [Town Warrant]
Current enrollment (as of October 1, 2013) at the High School is 2,021 students. That is a 9.7% increase
over the 1,842 student capacity designed in 1997 for what would be the major renovation project
approved by the Lexington voters on December 7, 1998, for excluded-debt financing, and was then
accomplished in phases over many years. The enrollment projection for FY2016 is 2,154 students-
16.9% more than that designed capacity. The adverse impact on the educational environment from that
enrollment growth, both current and projected, has been aggravated by the fact that 12 existing,
general-education, classrooms have had to be repurposed to meet specialized programmatic and
operational requirements.
To accommodate those pressures, construction funds are being requested to purchase and install in two
sets a total of 24 modular, Stretch-Energy-Code-compliant, classrooms & educational spaces in the next
two years at the High School. (The design & engineering (D&E) for such an expansion was presented to,
and approved by, the 2013 ATM under its Article 14(f).)While the construction funds being requested are
the full appropriation estimated as needed for both sets of classrooms, each set would be independently
bid. The area in which each set would go is constrained and would not readily accommodate simultaneous
constructions, and forcing a single mobilization is not contemplated to offer any meaningful cost savings.
The staggered availability is feasible as that supports when the associated special-educational enrollment
will reach the High School.
Each set would have a common roof covering its modular components. This work is considered only an
interim relief to address current and anticipated student enrollment in the next ten years. The Schools'
Master Plan includes a major reconstruction/replacement of the High School beginning in FY2021.
The first set (to be ready for use in the fall of 2014) would have 15 of the prebuilt
classrooms/educational spaces-10 classrooms for general education; 5 educational spaces for the
graduates of the Clarke Middle School Intensive Learning Program (ILP)—with 16,501 Gross Square
Feet(GSF)and be installed adjacent to and connected with the Arts &Humanities Building.
The second set (to be ready for use in the fall of 2015) would have 9 of the prebuilt
classrooms/educational spaces-2 classrooms for general education; 7 educational spaces for the
graduates of the Diamond Middle School ILP—with 6,300 GSF and be installed between and connected
to the Science and Math Buildings.
If Town Meeting approves this request, the planned timeline for the first set in 2014 is for contract award
in late January, site work beginning in early March, delivery of the modular units in late June, and
Certificate of Occupancy in August. (It's expected that a similar timeline would apply for the second set
in 2015.)
4
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
The following (based on a presentation to the Lexington School Committee on September 10, 2013)
reflects the above-cited positioning of the sets:
i Space Recommendation
l r•
1 .
I `
Summer 2015
Total for Two Years x General Ed Classrooms;
12 General Ed Classrooms ' 7 Educanonel Spaoss hu
.,,,.. Diamond ILP Groduaeac
12 Educational Spaces for
ILP Graduates --------
• Ala �I
II
'F
.....,.�. .��" Summer 2014
Ip Gmere 1 Ed CERSSrOMS
j 5 Educal*n4 Svaxes foe
,..r.s..a.e..e..e Clarke ILP Gradualf.,s
L t xlW;P IXI HK.NS ...., �TK&M .. >, >, >, >, >, ....v ... ■C,■
MLx;uLRk RL%M✓.]N x 7s 1LEXPIGIOFLMA I I Al I
September 10, 2013 4
Boxed Capteom Revised Oct 15,2013
(See the analysis under Article 3 regarding the financing plan for this project.)
Fund Funding
Article 5:Appropriate for Authorization Source Committee Recommends
Renovations to Requested
Buildings to be Acquired $2,846,184 CPF
at 39 Marrett Road $3,169,000 (Cash) +$322,816 Approval (5-0)
GF(Free Cash)
"The closing date for the acquisition of the property at 39 Marrett Road is scheduled for December 3,
2013. The Town has engaged the services of an architect to work with the Community Center Advisory
Committee to identify short term improvements needed to facilitate occupancy as soon as possible after
closing and for long-term improvements to the property needed to support town programs to be housed at
39 Marrett Road. This article is to request funds for the short-term improvements." [Town Warrant]
The March 18,2013, STM appropriated$11,212,500 for the purchase price and ancillary costs needed to
acquire the portion of the property at 33 Marrett Road that had been offered for sale by the Scottish Rite
to the Town with the understanding a Community Center would be established there. (That funding
consisted of $7,390,000 of CPF debt, $262,500 of CPF cash, and $3,560,000 of GF cash.) Also
appropriated was $100,000 of CPF cash toward the D&E of the code-compliance actions required for
initial occupancy (now identified as Phase 1) and schematic-level drawings for potential longer-term
5
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
improvements (now identified as Phase 2 or, perhaps, multiple phases) which would expand the
functionality as a Community Center. (See this Committee's Report to that STM, released
March 15, 2013, for the analysis it did at that time.)
There are two buildings on the approximately 10-acre portion being acquired: a historic Colonial Revival
mansion and its addition that contained the Scottish Rite's offices and training center (together ±31,500
gross square feet (GSF))—all of which has been deemed a historic resource—and another historic
building known as the Carriage House(CH) that the Scottish Rite used for storage (±8,760 GSF).
On April 22, 2013, the Board of Selectmen (BoS) created an Ad hoc Community Center Advisory
Committee (AhCCAC)with a Charge that included:
To provide recommendations to the Board of Selectmen of how to best serve the intellectual,
physical, cultural and social needs of our diverse community by identifying services to be delivered
in the Community Center, to be located at [39] Marrett Road and as voted at the March 18, 2013
Special Town Meeting. Consideration must be given to the timing and sequencing of providing these
services, along with the implications for staffing. Proposals to upgrade the facility should be made in
a manner which is sensitive to the historic nature of the site and to maintain the Town's relationship
with the immediate abutter(s).
Interim recommendations to the Board of Selectmen that will allow the initial operation of the
Community Center and relocation of appropriate Town departments, shall be provided. The
Committee will have completed its charge when the Community Center is fully operational as
defined by the Board of Selectmen.
To do the above-cited schematic-level D&E, Lexington engaged Steffian Bradley Architects (SBA) to
assist the Town and the AhCCAC—including the initial recommendations to the BoS. A primary
objective was to identify those improvements needed to facilitate and allow occupancy of the primary
building as soon as practical after closing; however, as the evaluation of that building progressed, the
AhCCAC agreed that there was substantial merit in accomplishing more than the absolute minimum work
in the first phase as there are significant structural and other improvements which are better done before
the building is occupied. (See Appendix B for a description of that evolution of scope for what is now
identified as Phase 1.)
The AhCCAC met, in public sessions, with SBA, Town staff, and other stakeholders to establish a
Phase 1 plan. The AhCCAC has provided its recommendations to the BoS of the Town staff and the
functions that should constitute the initial occupancy under Phase 1 and they include:
• At least all of the Human Services Department's staff that is current located in the Muzzey Senior
Center.
• All of the Recreation Department's staff with provision for at least its extra-office storage
requirements that are currently being met in the Cary Memorial Building as funding the
renovation of that building is contemplated to be a request at the 2014 ATM.
• All the functions presently conducted at the Muzzey Senior Center (excluding a commercial
kitchen as one is not provided in Phase 1). At the 2012 ATM, under Article 8(c), $561,518 was
appropriated from the CPF for the first of two stages of improvements to that Center, but had not
been spent. The second-stage appropriation of$526,818 from the CPF was originally planned at
the 2013 ATM, under Article 8(d), but was Indefinitely Postponed as relocating that Center's
functions to the new Community Center is now planned for the earliest date practical. For the
same reason, the earlier-appropriated funds now have been returned to the CPF. Together, that
represents an avoidance of a $1,088,336 expenditure that was planned as necessary if the
functions had remained at the Muzzey Senior Center.
• Creation of flexible spaces that can be shared for multiple purposes for community programming
and assembly use.
6
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
The AhCCAC will continue its deliberations and outreach to stakeholders and potential users of the
Community Center to evaluate and make later recommendations regarding its vision of the further
build-out of the Community Center(i.e.,Phase 2, etc.).
This Article only requests additional funds to complete the D&E (including construction documents), the
bidding process, and the construction for the Phase 1 initial occupany at the primary building at
39 Marrett Street and small amounts for the design of a sidewalk to the primary building ($20,000) and to
extend the schematic-level design for the full build-out ($50,000) to provide more detail on what future
phase(s) might entail and cost. That additional schematic-level design will also address the CH. (See
Appendix C for the summary-level budget for the work to be funded under this Article.)
If the Motion under this Article is approved at this STM, the balance of the D&E for Phase 1 could be
completed by the end of this calendar year, bids would be issued for Phase 1 with responses required by
the end of January 2014, and award by mid-February 2014. Construction would continue through
mid-September 2014, and the facility should being ready for occupancy by mid-October 2014.
At the meeting of the Community Preservation Committee (CPC) on October 24, 2013:
Town Counsel provided his advice that only the following components of the remaining Phase 1
scope (which scope has a total, estimated, project cost of $3,169,000) were questionable as to their
eligibility for funding from the CPF: (1) Telephone/Communications, AudioNisual Systems, and Phone
(totaling $189,800); (2)Installation of Salvaged Equipment ($5,700); and (3)Furniture, Fixtures, &
Equipment (FF&E) ($75,000). With the addition of direct-cost markups and contingencies for the first
two, the total estimated cost for all that Town Counsel questioned is $322,816; leaving $2,846,184
(89.8%) of the total, estimated, project cost for the balance of Phase 1 as not having questions regarding
eligibility for use of the CPF.
The Assistant Town Manager for Finance presented his updated model for projecting the status of
the CPF through FY2021. (The original model had been presented to Town Meeting when it considered
the purchase of the property.)
Following deliberations, the CPC then voted unanimously so as to:
(1) Endorse all of the proposed scope of the Phase 1 project, and
(2) Recommend to this STM that CPF cash be the source for the $2,846,184 costs of the
components not having questions as to their eligibility for use of the CPF. (The GF was expected
to be the source for the $322,816 balance of the remaining project's estimated cost—i.e., for the
components whose eligibility for use of the CPF was questioned by Town Counsel.)
7
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
APPENDIX A: Information on the Town's Current Specific Stabilization Funds
Lexington's Specified Stabilization Funds
as of October 15,2013
Town Warrant,Town of Lexington,for Special Town Meeting on 4 Nov 2013,signed 7 Oct 2013
Article 3:Appropriate To and From Specified Stabilization Funds
"To see if the Town will vote to appropriate sums of money to and from Stabilization Funds in accordance with Section 5B of Chapter
40 of the Massachusetts General Laws for the purposes of: (a)Section 135 Zoning By-Law,(b)Traffic Mitigation,(c)Transportation
Demand Management, (d)School Bus Transportation,(e)Special Education,(f)Center Improvement District;(g)Debt Service,(h)
Transportation Management Overlay District(TMO-1),(i)Avalon Bay School Enrollment Mitigation Fund,and(j)Capital Projects/Debt
Service Reserve/Building Renewal Fund;and determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy,by transfer from
available funds,or by any combination of these methods;or act in any other manner in relation thereto."
Warrant Town Meeting(ATM=Annual;STM=Special) Capital
Sequence Name Created Purpose Related
(a) Section 135 Zoning By-Law 2007 ATM, "for the purpose of financing public improvements pursuant to Yes
Article 39 Section 135 of the Code of Lexington"
(b) Traffic Mitigation 2007 ATM, "for the purpose of financing traffic mitigation projects Yes
Article 39 pursuant to conditions of special permits issue by the Town
(c) Transportation Demand 2007 ATM, "for the purpose of supporting the operations of Lexpress Bus No
Management Article 39 Service"
(d) School Bus Transportation 2007 ATM, "for the purpose of supporting transportation of students to No
Article 39 and from school on a daily basis"
(e) Special Education 2008 ATM, None stated when created,but Appropriation Committee No
Article 24 Report to that Town Meeting says"for setting aside reserves to
help cover unexpected out-of-district Special Education
expenses that exceed budget"
(f) Center Improvement District 2009 ATM, "to fund needed improvements in Lexington Center" Yes
Article 25
(g) Debt Service 2009 ATM, "for the purpose of paying a portion of the debt service on Yes
Article 26 certain outstanding bonds of the Town issued for the purpose
of the Diamond Middle School,Clarke Middle School and High
School construction projects"
(h) Transportation Management 2011 ATM, "for the purpose of financing transportation infrastructure Yes
Overlay District(TMO-1) Article 20 improvements per Section 135-43C of the Code of the Town of
Lexington"
(i) Avalon Bay School Enrollment 2011 ATM, "to mitigate the cost of students attending the Lexington Public No
Mitigation Fund Article 20 Schools who reside at Avalon Bay"
(j) Capital Projects/Debt Service 2012 STM None stated when created,but the name identifies the Yes
Reserve/Building Renewal Fund 19 Nov, intended purposes.
Article 3
Fund-by-Fund Information Prepared by the Capital Expenditures Committee
A-1
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE REPORT TO 2013 STM(Nov 4th)
APPENDIX B: Evolution from Community Center Immediate-Use Strategy to Phase 1 Strategy
October 17 Update to Ad hoc Community Center Advisory Committee
The Board-of-Selectmen-appointed Ad hoc Community Center Advisory Committee (AhCCAC), along
with the various liaisons from that Board,the Town staff, and other Town committees, are looking at the
Community Center in its totality. To that end, the programming for the "immediate" (or "initial
occupancy") and "full build" use is being planned concurrently.
There has been an evolution of thought regarding the "immediate use". At first, the concept was to
move in as soon as possible after acquiring the building and to execute a limited renovation scope that
would satisfy the building-code requirements and the minimum needs of the Human Services and
Recreation Departments as they support, in the new space, at least as much of the current Muzzey
Senior Center program as practical.
Upon further reflection, it was suggested that performing more work while the building is unoccupied
would result in a better environment in the new space for the initial programming and, of significance,
would reduce the amount of subsequent construction for any future enhancement as that would entail
doing so in already occupied space. Also recognized is that what are the space and conditions for the
immediate use are likely to be for at least two years, if not longer. The result is that the Immediate-Use
Strategy gave way to what is now being called "Phase 1." The scope for Phase 1 includes the
"Immediate-Use Strategy" plus all of the work necessary to: 1) avoid future, major, disruptions to staff
and programs, 2) replicate or improve the services currently provided by the departments moving into
the building, and 3) make the facility more flexible, including increased floor-load capacity and
additional restrooms.
The Team—the AhCCAC, the Town staff, and the various liaisons—approve the Phase 1 strategy. The
Team understands that the first-phase costs will go up from what was presented to the Board of
Selectmen on September 23, 2013. The Team also understands that the increased expense is really a
matter of timing. In essence, the cost differential between the "Immediate-Use Strategy" and the
Phase 1 strategy is a matter of how big of a chunk you "slice off the whole loaf" at the beginning. ...Prior
to purchasing the building, budget numbers were prepared for the "full build" (but without the addition
of a large, multi-purpose, space) of approximately $950,000 for the design & engineering (D&E) and
approximately $8,546,000 for the subsequent construction. To date, only $100,000 has been
appropriated for the initial D&E: schematic designs only for the first phase and the "full build". The
appropriation being requested at the November 4, 2013, Special Town Meeting is to complete the D&E
for Phase 1 up through construction documents, and to fund the bidding process and the construction—
including oversight of that construction. That appropriation is the "slice" taken off those original budget
numbers for both D&E and the "full build" construction.
It is also important to note, that little if anything slated for Phase 1 construction will be removed or
altered as part of Phase 2. While mechanical system upgrades could have been accomplished in Phase
1, no one is certain what the future mechanical system requirements might be; that will have to wait
until Phase 2 requirements are fully designed.
10/17/2013 7:21:16 AM
Edited by Capital Expenditures Committee for clarity
B-1
Lexington Community Center Phase I
� - 1 b
Interim Scope Phase 1 m
Ward 0_ z
d
D1 ro-c L Costs 55104% InWMM Scme i0,AD0
Slruciurel $722.0D0 n
Lavaturilim. S51.0D0 n
Sao"R In�r eeft 577,000 °
Y
AN Syrlemr. 353,OiDd
Siapnage S74,OiD0 Y
RamGrig $}2.W0 (�
New Lighting
Di rec t Gast Su bl.431al $51+x, } $1,165,000 �° d
Direct Cost Markups and cuff irrgenciae
m
Gernerel Condillons,General Regw rermi-its,Insura ncg& Fee % 51 ZY, 2:3, ',
Prise and 111 Contingency 15% 516.040 16% 53m.000 CD y�
F' i` I� fio€aa ! •ail 'i.li'i1r-'� 4.50% $29,15W � a
I W.il Es Lim atud :on�tr ud ion.Cost fur Phase 1 $75-,400 $u2,5 .400
c,n�1 ruclin Change[3rder C ranlin ancg Phase 1 5^b 113.01 7.5% $iB7.DDO Q, m
vo
oft costs C
o
,!�I ;7a a ,,rlrl ilY1'167�Ifrl�irli Crs !ilrur. n �f t[#F11Irbl 6 50% $49.(X)4) D 50% 6 t6w.100 � O
E d1 di liri.1 8 C anal r�licrr Addrim i"lralicri 2.5(% $9. 231% ' .OM A � �
C7
F F'�F 575.440 O
Mi4,r. Ccoi.4kinams(gel,lev"J 510,ya, y
CA1r1imig%irlFiw S1g t]fij(� N
Fi.[}t}Q '� o
w
TelIA 1 .,Ii+rialI'd Fi iill Coal 1W Pi1FM 1 V40) CD �
[To�jaitaa ard Cu4L * go 11 f oak
SAC(t'Yi $3,Cbi 1,OOd 0
oiict ContiitULmCy $-00°4 S8 W0
�
011ie r C-onalderatlons C
&cc,�alk [design D, O
I' se 2 Schematic Continualic $5tl,4Dd
I Pry #' OSi~ S ,i ,QOd
1 011 71201 3 : 11:52 Alit As Approved by AtkCCAC