HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-04-03-TFMP-min77SR TOWN OF LEXINGTON
a Ad hoc Townwide Facilities Master Planning Committee
k_
APRIL IT
� k1NG'V
Minutes
Town of Lexington
Ad hoc Townwide Facilities Master Planning Committee (AhTFMPC)
April 3, 2013
Place and time: Public Services Building, 8:30 a.m.
Members Present: Bill Kennedy, Chair; John P. Carroll; Peter Kelley, Selectman; Jeanne Krieger;
Richard Pagett; Joe Pato, Selectman; Jessie Steigerwald, School Committee
Members Absent: none
Liaisons Present: Mark Corr, Chief, Police Department; Laura Hussong, Community Center Task
Force (CCTF); David Kanter, Capital Expenditures Committee; Alan Levine, Appropriation
Committee; Louise Lipsitz, School Department; Linda Vine, Town Manager's Office; John Wilson,
Chief, Fire Department
Liaisons Absent: James Goell, CCTF; Joseph McWeeney, Permanent Building Committee (PBC);
Paul Lapointe, Council on Aging (COA);
Also present: Ken Buckland, The Cecil Group; Eunice Kim, The Cecil Group; Pat Goddard,
Department of Public Facilities; Karen Simmons, Recreation Department; Bob Pressman,
Community Preservation Committee; Fred Johnson, Center Committee & Cary Memorial Building
Committee; Carol Ann Bottino, resident
Recording Secretary: Sara Arnold
The meeting was called to order at 8:31 a.m.
1. Comments: Mr. Kennedy reviewed this Committee's charge and noted that many of the
liaisons have a stake in the facilities and projects that are being reviewed. Those so affected
have prepared written material summarizing their issues. Mr. Kennedy asked those liaisons
to report verbally to the Committee.
2. Police Station: Chief Corr identified issues/concerns related to the Police Station:
A. Space: The current station is 12-13,000 square feet and a police station with Lexington's
demands should be 25-30,000 square feet. The lack of storage space is a concern. For
example, evidence needs to be stored; a case can be brought back to the court system
years after it is thought to have been resolved. The Town needs a lab for processing
evidence because the state lab is backlogged.
B. Mechanical and Structural Issues: The heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system
is inefficient. The roof leaks and the composite has been compromised. Computer
systems need physical and environmental protections.
C. Safety: Fire arms need to be handled and stored safely. The building should have
safeguards in the event of a bomb incident. The building should be earthquake resistant.
There need to be separate areas for those under arrest.
D. Building Design: A centrally located emergency dispatch area and a community
gathering room are needed. It has been said that if the current building is renovated, the
four outside walls cannot be moved. This will restrict flow and interaction between
units.
E. There are additional needs that have been identified since a needs study was completed a
few years ago.
■ The Town needs to re -think its 911 center; it should be a "survivable pod".
■ The recent accreditation review identified some additional needs.
■ The firing ranges need to be improved to meet current standards.
Chief Corr recommended that the Town look at the program and then find the space that will
meet the program's needs rather than finding the space and then trying to fit the program
into that space. This approach is more important than whether the police station is joined
with the fire station or whether it is relocated. As mentioned at previous meetings, Chief
Corr believes that a new fire station is a higher priority than a new police station.
In response to questions about location, Chief Corr said that visibility is important, and
being in the vicinity of the center is advantageous. He believes the current police station
location, the current fire station location, the Liberty Mutual site on Bedford Street, or a
comparable location are all acceptable for a police station. He does not support moving the
police station to an outlying area such as Hartwell Avenue. He believes it is possible to
incorporate the Hosmer House into the design for a new or renovated police station. He also
believes that a larger footprint could be accommodated on the current location by removing
some of the driveway curb cuts.
If the Police Station remains in its current location, there is the challenge of finding swing
space during construction or renovation. Chief Corr suggested that Cary Memorial Building
may be an option, but questioned whether the anticipated Cary renovations would be
negatively impacted by such a use.
3. Fire Station: Chief Wilson discussed issues related to the Fire Station.
A. Space: The current building is too small; a trailer in the back lot is currently being used,
which negatively impacts internal communication and customer service. There is no
storage space. Six pieces of equipment are stored outside; they should be inside a heated
facility. The living quarters and the exercise room are inadequate.
B. Mechanical and Structural Issues: The building is inefficient. It has flooding problems
because the ground level is below grade. Ideally, there would be outside space for
drying the hoses; Lexington now uses a hose dryer. It is also possible to hang the hoses
from a multi -story building for drying
C. Location: The current location is the best; anywhere within a half mile of the current
location will work.
Three years ago, when options for a new/renovated police station and a new/renovated fire
station were explored, there were conversations with the Historic Districts Commission
(HDC). They didn't express any objections to the proposals being considered at the time,
and they were willing to discuss either new locations for these facilities or using the current
sites for new/renovated buildings. West of Lexington center, the Historic District stops at
the corner of Bedford St. and Worthen Rd.
In response to questions, Chief Wilson commented that the police and fire station needs
have very little overlap, but there is the potential to share some space such as for training.
As mentioned at previous meetings, Chief Wilson believes that a new fire station is a likely
higher priority than a new police station.
4. Hastings School: Ms. Lipsitz, principal of the Hastings School, reported that Hastings is
the only Kindergarten through Grade 5 school in Lexington that has not been upgraded or
replaced in recent years.
A. Space: The school is currently using modular units that were previously used at Clarke
Middle School. Classroom sizes do not meet the state's standards for new schools. The
Town is expecting an additional 200 students in the near future, and those students need
to be serviced differently from the way students were serviced in the past. Additional
special needs students require additional space to provide special services. Space for the
school nurse needs to be increased because with improved health care, the number of
fragile children attending the schools has increased.
B. Acreage: Hastings can be rebuilt in its current location, but it will be a multi -story
building with a smaller footprint than the current building. Finding swing space will
need to be addressed.
The School Committee expects to apply for Massachusetts School Building Authority
funding for a Hastings School feasibility study in 2014. It is expected that a new building
will be more cost effective than renovating the current building.
5. Cary Memorial Building: There wasn't time for a full report from Mr. Johnson, but Mr.
Pato reported that the Selectmen had supported indefinite postponement of Article 8c (Cary
Memorial Building Upgrades), included on the Town of Lexington Warrant for the 2013
Annual Town Meeting. He explained that he initiated the motion because he felt there was
value in waiting for a decision on pursuing the upgrades until after this Committee
completed its work. He asked whether this Committee felt there was value in postponing
the article.
It was generally agreed that the Police and Fire Stations were high priority projects. The
proposal for investment in the Cary Building presumes financing fully with Community
Preservation Act (CPA) funds. There was discussion about the use of CPA funds for the
Police and Fire Stations, as well as the currently proposed Cary Building, and currently
considered new Community Center. It was noted that the Town's financing model shows
that these latter two projects as well as others can be financed comfortably. It was generally
agreed that the sequencing of these projects does not impact the use of the CPA funds. It
was noted that Article 8c only includes funding for design and engineering work; actual
construction would require another vote by Town Meeting in 2014.
There was discussion about using the basement of the Cary Building as swing space during
Police Station renovations or while a new Police Station was built in the current location.
There was some concern that renovating the Cary Building before the Police Station was
built/renovated would preclude using the Cary Building as swing space for the Police
Station project. There was, however, also concern that during any time the Cary Building
space was used as swing space for police purposes, it would be unavailable for other uses
given police security requirements.
Some felt there was no down -side in waiting until a Fall 2013 Special Town Meeting to
address the Cary Memorial Building project. Mr. Kelley commented that it would be best to
have a clear picture of all the projects and how they fit together before making decisions.
Others did not think this was a reason to delay the Cary Building project. Mr. Johnson said
that the various projects being discussed don't compete, and therefore a delay isn't
necessary.
There was a motion to recommend support of the indefinite postponement of the Cary
Memorial Building funding request under the Community Preservation Act to allow the
committee to complete its work.
VOTE: 1-4-2
6. Next Meeting: The next meeting will be on April 24 at 8:30 a.m.
7. Adjourn: The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 a.m.
Materials used at the meeting:
➢ Agenda
➢ Memos to Mr. Buckland regarding Townwide Facilities Master Plan Service Improvements:
o Fire Station: From Chief Wilson, January 17, 2013
o Police Station: From Chief Corr, January 17, 2013
o Human Services/Council on Aging: From Mr. LaPointe and Ms. Adler, January 25,
2013
o Cary Memorial Building: From Mr. Johnson, January 23, 2013
o Community Center: From Community Center Task Force: January 25, 2013
o Hastings School: From Ms. Lipsitz, January 21, 2013
o High School: From Ms. Steigerwald, January 17, 2013
➢ 3 Scenarios for April 3: Lexington Facilities Alternatives prepared by The Cecil Group for
April 3, 2013 meeting
➢ Schematic Design for Fire Station from Lexington Fire Station Schematic Design Study,
February 15, 2011 by Donham & Sweeney Architects
➢ Schematic Design for Police Station from Lexington Police Station Schematic Design Study,
February 15, 2011 by Donham & Sweeney Architects
4
Scenario 1: Combine & Reuse Facilities
SUMMARY PROGRAM
• Police and Fire to Liberty Mutual (options)
Cn
• Community Center to 33 Marrett Road
• School Admin to Police Station or new High School
U
li • High School reconstruction with or without School
c Admin
0
CM • Upgrades and maintenance for other facilities
c
J
ASSUMPTIONS
• Liberty Mutual building is demolished, and the Police/
Fire Facility is new construction
• Police Station building is reused for School Admin (if
School Admin moved to Police Station site)
* Hosmer House is not incorporated or moved
• High School project is done in phases
COMPARATIVE CRITERIA SUMMARY
COST
Combined Police and Fire at New Site
Land Purchase
$3,397,680
Construction
$18,374,175
Disposition of Land
$3.023.000
School Administration to Police Station
Renovation $2,750,000
Community Center to 33 Marrett $11,893,717
Total $39,438,572
SERVICE IMPACTS
Likely requires smaller Police/Fire Station programs + Moves School Admin to more central location and creates
due to site constraints centralized area for Town/School offices, or moves School
Admin to High School campus
FEASIBILITY
— Requires acquisition of private property for Police/Fire + Reuses Police Station and Fire Station sites for Town
Facility (willingness of Liberty Mutual or other owner and purposes
timing unknown) + No swing space required for PS and FS if Police/Fire Facility
— May not be enough space for combined Police/Fire built first (before School Admin and Community Center projects)
Facility, and configuration on site could be challenging + Does not affect Hosmer House
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
+ Preserves historic Police Station
ThelCecil Group
Planning and Design
Scenario 2: Sequential Projects
cz SUMMARY PROGRAM
0- • Fire to Liberty Mutual
Cn
• Police to Fire Station
• Community Center to 33 Marrett Road
li • School Admin to Police Station or new High School
o • High School reconstruction with or without School
C, Admin
x • Upgrades and maintenance for other facilities
a�
J
ASSUMPTIONS
• Liberty Mutual building is demolished, and the Fire
Station is new construction
• Fire Station building is reused and expanded for
Police Station
• Police Station building is reused for School Admin (if
School Admin moved to Police Station site)
* Hosmer House is not incorporated or moved
• High School project is done in phases
COMPARATIVE CRITERIA SUMMARY
COST
Fire Station to New Site
Purchase of Site $2,265,120
Construction $9,425,250
Police Station to Fire Station
SERVICE IMPACT
Likely requires smaller Police Station program due to t No break in service and no swing space needed during
site constraints construction
- Requires acquisition of private property for Fire
Station (willingness of Liberty Mutual or other owner and
timing unknown)
- Provides enough space for Fire Station, but
configuration on site could be challenging
- May not be enough space for Police Station
ThelCecil Group
Planning and Design
+ Provides enough space for Comunity Center and Fire Station
programs
+ Moves School Admin to more central location and creates
centralized area for Town/School offices, or moves School Admin
to High School campus
FEASIBILITY
+Allows for sequencing of projects without swing space: 1) Fire
Station, 2) Police Station, 3) Community Center (timing of other
projects not affected)
+ Reuses Police Station and Fire Station sites for Town purposes
+ Supports other use of Hosmer House
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
+ Preserves historic Police Station and Fire Station
Demolition
$179,850
Construction
$10,990,500
School Admin to Police Station
$2,750,000
Community Center to 33 Marrett
$11,893,717
Total
$37,504,437
SERVICE IMPACT
Likely requires smaller Police Station program due to t No break in service and no swing space needed during
site constraints construction
- Requires acquisition of private property for Fire
Station (willingness of Liberty Mutual or other owner and
timing unknown)
- Provides enough space for Fire Station, but
configuration on site could be challenging
- May not be enough space for Police Station
ThelCecil Group
Planning and Design
+ Provides enough space for Comunity Center and Fire Station
programs
+ Moves School Admin to more central location and creates
centralized area for Town/School offices, or moves School Admin
to High School campus
FEASIBILITY
+Allows for sequencing of projects without swing space: 1) Fire
Station, 2) Police Station, 3) Community Center (timing of other
projects not affected)
+ Reuses Police Station and Fire Station sites for Town purposes
+ Supports other use of Hosmer House
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
+ Preserves historic Police Station and Fire Station
Scenario 3: On Site
SUMMARY PROGRAM
• Fire Station on site with added parcel
• Police Station on site
• High School reconstruction with School Admin
li • Community Center at 33 Marrett Road
o • Upgrades and maintenance for other facilities
CM
X ASSUMPTIONS
• Fire Station building is demolished and reconstructed
on site with adjacent site added
• Police Station building is renovated and expanded on
site
* Hosmer House is moved to a new location
• Scottish Rite Headquarters/Training Center reused for
Community Center
COMPARATIVE CRITERIA SUMMARY
COST
Fire Station
Acquisition $702,187
Swing Space $1,000,000
Construction $13,578,165
Police
Swing Space
$500,000
Construction
$12,555,585
School Administration
Construction
Community Center to 33 Marrett
$11,893,717
Total
$40,229,654
SERVICE IMPACTS
+ Keeps Police Station and Fire Station at their central locations
+ Provides enough space for Community Center, Police Station
and Fire Station programs
+ Moves School Admin to more central location and creates
centralized area for Town/School offices, or moves School
Admin to High School campus
FEASIBILITY
— Requires swing space for Fire Station and Police Station + Does not dictate timing/phasing of projects
— Requires new location for the Hosmer House + Reuses Police Station and Fire Station sites
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
T Preserves historic Police Station and Fire Station
ThelCecil Grou
Planning and Design
LEXINGTON FIRE STATION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDY
REPORT
15 February 2011
by
Donham & Sweeney
ARCHITECTS
Brett Donham AIA, Principal -in -Charge
Jeff Shaw AIA LEED AP, Principal & Project Manager
LEXINGTON FIRE STATION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDY
REPORT
Preliminary Plans, Option B -New Building
AERIAL DIAGRAM
19
LEXINGTON POLICE STATION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDY
REPORT
15 February 2011
by
Donham & Sweeney
ARCHITECTS
Brett Donham AIA, Principal -in -Charge
Jeff Shaw AIA LEED AP, Principal & Project Manager
LEXINGTON POLICE STATION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN STUDY
REPORT
Preliminary Plans -Addition and Renovation
AERIAL DIAGRAM
15