HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-07-CEC-min
Capital Expenditures Committee & Joint Meeting with Appropriation Committee
Proposed Minutes March 7th, 2000
1. Meeting was called to order by the Chairmen in the Bird Room in Cary Hall at
7:00pm. Members present: Narain Bhatia, Tom Griffiths, Charles Hornig, and
Shirley Stolz.
2. Charles reported on gang-of-8 meeting:
??
Still worried about high high school bids.
??
When all elementary bids taken into account, project will likely be $2.5M-
to-$3.5M over budget.
th
3. Tom reported on the March 7 School Committee Meeting:
??
The School Committee decided to adopt Option III: build two schools and
renovate 4.
??
Not clear was whether the School Committee believed the aggressive start
date of mid-2001 could be met.
??
Tom had urged the School Committee to move aggressively.
??
The School Committee announced its FY2001, FY2002, and FY2003 small ticket
budgets of $2.1M, $300K, and $300K, respectively. This agrees with the
Scenario 1 budget.
4. The Committee worked on its final Town Meeting positions prior to meeting
with the Appropriation Committee, agreeing to conform to the Appropriation
Committee positions where the Committees did not already conform:
??
The Committee noted that the $1M amount for elementary school design and
development still needed a description and justification. Tom is meeting
with John Moynihan tomorrow to learn what has happened along those lines.
??
The Committee voted unanimously to support the Appropriation Committee’s
recommendation to raise the General Fund amount for DPW equipment from
$72,864 to $97,000 to allow the DPW to purchase a sander/dumptruck, it’s
highest priority purchase.
??
The Committee voted unanimously to support the Town Manager’s
recommendation that $125,505 be added to road maintenance. This conforms
with the Appropriation Committee position.
??
The Committee agreed to adopt a $30K item for FY2001 for work on
playgrounds. (3 in favor, 1 abstention)
??
The Committee agreed unanimously to recommend $25K for a needs study for
the Senior Center.
5. At about 8:10pm the Committee joined the Appropriation Committee at a joint
meeting in the Civil Room of Cary Hall with the following results:
??
The Appropriation Committee declined to revisit the issue of providing
money out of the general fund for playgrounds. Its position was that there
is a $300K-to-$400K surplus in Recreation Commission funds, and that it
believes the Recreation Enterprise Fund should be tapped for such things,
despite the playground’s not being a revenue-generating activity.
Appropriation indicated it would support Enterprise-Fund money for
playground work.
??
The Appropriation Committee was unwilling to reconsider its recommendation
against any funding for a Senior Center study.
??
The Committees noted that their common positions will result in either
less borrowing or in unexpended money, or both. Each Committee voted that
any such excess unexpended money should be added to the stabilization
fund.
??
The joint meeting ended at about 8:55pm
6. At 8:55pm, the Capital Expenditures Committee resumed its separate meeting in
the Bird Room.
7. The Committee decided the following:
??
In light of the Appropriation Committee’s opposition, to drop its proposal
for a playground appropriation from the general fund. It would support an
Enterprise-Fund initiative.
??
Not to reconsider its position to provide $25K for a senior center needs
study.
??
To explicitly recommend for FY2002 removing all money added to the
Stabilization Fund in FY2001. (Unanimous)
??
To explicitly add a line to its small-ticket projections that gives, for
each year, the Committee’s projection as to the amount of 5% cash capital
that is not yet allocated to capital spending for that year. (Unanimous)
8. Attached hereto is a spreadsheet that summarizes the Committee’s big- and
small-ticket positions as of this meeting. This spreadsheet also
summarizes the total estimated 5% (plus BAN-financed) cash capital
available for capital spending in fiscal years 2001 through 2005.
9. Also attached hereto is a spreadsheet that summarizes the Committee’s
recommendations for each of the Warrant articles and shows the few
differences between the Committee’s recommendations and the capital
recommendations of the Appropriation Committee.
10. The meeting adjourned at 10:15pm.
Minutes by Tom Griffiths
Capital Expenditures Committee & Joint Meeting with Appropriation Committee
Proposed Minutes March 7th, 2000
1. Meeting was called to order by the Chairmen in the Bird Room in Cary Hall at
7:00pm. Members present: Narain Bhatia, Tom Griffiths, Charles Hornig, and
Shirley Stolz.
2. Charles reported on gang-of-8 meeting:
??
Still worried about high high school bids.
??
When all elementary bids taken into account, project will likely be $2.5M-
to-$3.5M over budget.
th
3. Tom reported on the March 7 School Committee Meeting:
??
The School Committee decided to adopt Option III: build two schools and
renovate 4.
??
Not clear was whether the School Committee believed the aggressive start
date of mid-2001 could be met.
??
Tom had urged the School Committee to move aggressively.
??
The School Committee announced its FY2001, FY2002, and FY2003 small ticket
budgets of $2.1M, $300K, and $300K, respectively. This agrees with the
Scenario 1 budget.
4. The Committee worked on its final Town Meeting positions prior to meeting
with the Appropriation Committee, agreeing to conform to the Appropriation
Committee positions where the Committees did not already conform:
??
The Committee noted that the $1M amount for elementary school design and
development still needed a description and justification. Tom is meeting
with John Moynihan tomorrow to learn what has happened along those lines.
??
The Committee voted unanimously to support the Appropriation Committee’s
recommendation to raise the General Fund amount for DPW equipment from
$72,864 to $97,000 to allow the DPW to purchase a sander/dumptruck, it’s
highest priority purchase.
??
The Committee voted unanimously to support the Town Manager’s
recommendation that $125,505 be added to road maintenance. This conforms
with the Appropriation Committee position.
??
The Committee agreed to adopt a $30K item for FY2001 for work on
playgrounds. (3 in favor, 1 abstention)
??
The Committee agreed unanimously to recommend $25K for a needs study for
the Senior Center.
5. At about 8:10pm the Committee joined the Appropriation Committee at a joint
meeting in the Civil Room of Cary Hall with the following results:
??
The Appropriation Committee declined to revisit the issue of providing
money out of the general fund for playgrounds. Its position was that there
is a $300K-to-$400K surplus in Recreation Commission funds, and that it
believes the Recreation Enterprise Fund should be tapped for such things,
despite the playground’s not being a revenue-generating activity.
Appropriation indicated it would support Enterprise-Fund money for
playground work.
??
The Appropriation Committee was unwilling to reconsider its recommendation
against any funding for a Senior Center study.
??
The Committees noted that their common positions will result in either
less borrowing or in unexpended money, or both. Each Committee voted that
any such excess unexpended money should be added to the stabilization
fund.
??
The joint meeting ended at about 8:55pm
6. At 8:55pm, the Capital Expenditures Committee resumed its separate meeting in
the Bird Room.
7. The Committee decided the following:
??
In light of the Appropriation Committee’s opposition, to drop its proposal
for a playground appropriation from the general fund. It would support an
Enterprise-Fund initiative.
??
Not to reconsider its position to provide $25K for a senior center needs
study.
??
To explicitly recommend for FY2002 removing all money added to the
Stabilization Fund in FY2001. (Unanimous)
??
To explicitly add a line to its small-ticket projections that gives, for
each year, the Committee’s projection as to the amount of 5% cash capital
that is not yet allocated to capital spending for that year. (Unanimous)
8. Attached hereto is a spreadsheet that summarizes the Committee’s big- and
small-ticket positions as of this meeting. This spreadsheet also
summarizes the total estimated 5% (plus BAN-financed) cash capital
available for capital spending in fiscal years 2001 through 2005.
9. Also attached hereto is a spreadsheet that summarizes the Committee’s
recommendations for each of the Warrant articles and shows the few
differences between the Committee’s recommendations and the capital
recommendations of the Appropriation Committee.
10. The meeting adjourned at 10:15pm.
Minutes by Tom Griffiths