|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2012-05-09-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
2012-05-09-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:26:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:03:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 9, 2012 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in The Selectmen’s Meeting Room, <br />Town Office Building was called to order at 6:05 p.m. by Chairman Richard Canale with <br />members Greg Zurlo, Wendy Manz, Charles Hornig and Michelle Ciccolo and planning staff <br />Maryann McCall-Taylor, Aaron Henry and Lori Kaufman present. <br /> <br />********************************TOWN MEETING******************************* <br />Article 34, 2027 and 2013 Massachusetts Avenue/Dana Home: <br /> <br />Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): <br /> <br />Mr. Canale said he would have liked additional edits to the MOU. The Board of Selectmen <br />should have had more time to make improvements for clarity and better order. If anything is left <br />open ended enforcement could be difficult. Ms. McCall-Taylor said the Building Commissioner <br />reviewed the document and had no issues with it. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 4-1, (Mr. Canale opposed) to confirm that the <br />executed MOU has the approval of the Planning Board since the conditions of the Board’s <br />recommendations have been met. <br /> <br />It was stated that the hope was to have the MOU reflect Mr. Canale’s opinions so the entire Board <br />could approve it; however, the Board could still recommend further conditions to be included in <br />the special permit and the Board will indicate that to the Zoning Board of Appeals in the future. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to reconsider the vote on Article 34. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 4-1, (Mr. Canale opposed) to accept the <br />report as amended for Article 34 with the conditions outlined as being met. <br /> <br />Presentation of Article 34: <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to reconsider the vote on the substitution <br />of the amended PSDUP. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.