Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2012 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Richard Canale with members Greg Zurlo, Wendy <br />Manz, Michelle Ciccolo and Charles Hornig and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor, Aaron <br />Henry and Lori Kaufman present. <br /> <br />************************DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION********************* <br />Jefferson Union, Minor modification: <br /> <br />Beverly and Michael Meadows, the applicants were requesting a modification to the special <br />permit granted to Jefferson Union Trust on August 28, 2005. The applicants were requesting a <br />reduction of the $200,000 payment to LexHAB specified in the special permit. It is believed that <br />this sum might have been based on an estimate of the cost of a unit in 2005 but there is no record <br />of how the figure was arrived at. DHCD did not approve the affordability restrictions for several <br />years during which time the unit values have declined and the developer had to pay carrying <br />charges much longer than anticipated. In addition to reducing the total amount, the applicant <br />would like to pay with a combination of cash and in-kind services to the town. They are the <br />successful bidder on some construction projects for the town so have a contract and have gone <br />through the procurement process. <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> <br /> While not persuaded by the costs of the unit, there was sympathy regarding the <br />overpayment of taxes as well as the hold up by DHCD for several years. Based on the <br />current value of homes the amount of $150,000 would be acceptable. <br /> <br /> There was no statement found on record about the methodology used to derive the <br />$200,000 figure. <br /> <br /> The Board was uncomfortable with a partial payment being made through services to the <br />town. <br /> <br /> There should to be consideration made to the increased cost since this is not going to <br />market today and $160,000 would be acceptable. <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to accept this as a minor modification to <br />the special permit. <br /> <br />