Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2012 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Richard Canale with members Wendy Manz, Michelle <br />Ciccolo, Greg Zurlo, and Charles Hornig and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor, and Lori <br />Kaufman present. <br /> <br />********************************TOWN MEETING******************************* <br />Joint Meeting with the Center Sub-Committee on Zoning <br />Article 36, Home Occupations in the CB District: <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded it was voted, 5-0, to recommend to Town Meeting the <br />motion as written by staff and ask staff to write the report supporting Article 36 for Home <br />Occupations in the CB District. <br />Article 35, Residential Use in the CB District: <br />Mr. Levin of the Center Sub Committee said there was some apprehension in the Center <br />Committee that allowing residential use on street level by special permit could cause some <br />concern at Town Meeting so residential use should only be allowed above the first floor. <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> <br /> Keeping residential use above the first floor is a good idea. <br /> <br /> There would be some first floor space devoted to residential access anyway. <br /> <br /> Better to keep it simple. <br /> <br /> Clear access is permitted since it already exists as access to offices now. In Lexington <br />Place the lobby is behind the storefronts and there is no need to limit square footage, just <br />limit ground floor use to residential unit access. <br /> Mr. Brown said that economic conditions would dictate limited use of storefront, but leave some <br />flexibility for space behind them for residential lobbies. <br /> <br /> Economic conditions did not dictate the narrow entrances at Lexington Place, Town <br />Meeting did. <br />Mr. Michelson said the Center Committee wants a pedestrian center and wide driveways would <br />not be appealing to pedestrians. <br /> <br /> Entrances could be defined by the state building code to determine what should be <br />required. <br /> <br />