Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 2011 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, was <br />called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Richard Canale with members Charles Hornig, Wendy <br />Manz, Greg Zurlo and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor and Aaron Henry. Michelle <br />Ciccolo was absent <br /> <br />*********************************ZONING BYLAW***************************** <br />Tree Bylaw: <br />The Board discussed the recent rezoning passed by Town Meeting regarding the tree bylaw. It <br />attempted to provide some clarification of what the Planning Board’s jurisdiction is in dealing <br />with subdivisions, but still requires some interpretation of how it pertains to new and original lot <br />lines. Staff reviewed recent approvals to see what affect it may have and to provide applicants <br />with a clearer expectation of how the tree bylaw would be applied by the Board. <br /> <br />Ms. McCall-Taylor suggested that conventional subdivisions would have the tree bylaw applied <br />to the new lot lines and the special permit residential developments (SPRD) would use the <br />original lot lines, which would make the SPRD more attractive to applicants. <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> <br /> The tree bylaw would not allow waivers for conventional subdivisions, but could be <br />allowed as appropriate for SPRD. <br /> <br /> The Tree Committee’s purpose of applying the new bylaws to subdivisions was in case <br />future Boards were not as tree friendly as the current Board. <br /> <br /> The purpose would be to give the applicants more predictability and allow them to weigh <br />the pros and cons of building a conventional subdivision as opposed to a SPRD. <br /> <br /> The tree bylaw should be used as a guideline. <br /> <br /> Applicants may have to go through several calculations for mitigation of the trees. <br />Mr. Henry said this may make conventional subdivision more site-sensitive to avoid mitigation <br />and would produce a better product either way. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />