Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 9, 2011 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town Office <br />Building was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Greg Zurlo with members Richard Canale, Charles <br />Hornig, Michelle Ciccolo, Wendy Manz and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor, Aaron Henry, and <br />Lori Kaufman present. <br /> <br />TOWN MEETING <br />*********************************** ********************************* <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Article 39, Traffic and Renovation: <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo called the public hearing to order at 7:30 p.m. There were approximately seven people in the <br />audience. Ms. McCall-Taylor explained that this article seeks to remove the word renovation from <br />section 135-71B of the zoning bylaw as this serves as a disincentive for maintaining and updating existing <br />properties. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to close the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. <br /> <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted, 5-0, to recommend the approval of Article 39 to <br />Town Meeting. <br /> <br />Article 40, Rezoning 1095 Massachusetts Avenue from RS to CRS: <br /> <br />Mr. Zurlo called the public hearing to order at 7:42 p.m. There were approximately seven people in the <br />audience. Mr. Thomas Fenn, attorney, and Mr. Douglas Chapman, property owner, were present. Mr. <br />Fenn distributed a handout and said the site is located at the corner of Maple Street and Massachusetts <br />Avenue and its grandfathered use is exclusively for a gas station. Mr. Chapman’s petition is to rezone this <br />site to the commercial zone CRS to maximize the potential use and make it a legal site. There have been <br />mixed reactions in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> What is the building setback? Mr. Fenn said the building is on the property line; <br /> <br /> There is concern that there should be predictability for any owner and this rezoning has potential <br />issues; <br /> <br />