Laserfiche WebLink
61-426 <br />Selectmen's Meeting Minutes <br />November 1, 1999 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, November 1, 1999 in the <br />Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office Building at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Enrich, Mrs. Eddison, <br />Mrs. Krieger, Mrs. Abbott, Mrs. McKenna; Mr. White, Town Manager; Mr. Cohen, Town <br />Counsel; and Ms. Smith, Executive Clerk were present. <br />Public Comments <br />Alan Lazarus from the Executive Board of the Town Meeting Members Association reported on <br />the concern of some of their members that the recently distributed Town Y2K pamphlet <br />increased anxiety rather than eliminated it. They felt the concern was so great that the Selectmen <br />should send out a letter assuring members of the community that you have indeed tested the <br />Town's facilities, that you do not expect things will happen and if they do, it should be short <br />lived. <br />Mr. Enrich thanked Mr. Lazarus and said the Board will be sending out a newsletter before the <br />end of the year and the Board intends to address Y2K. The Town has also been approached by <br />another group of citizens who feel that the Town's Y2K preparedness information is not enough. <br />Mrs. Krieger reminded everyone that there is a Y2K informational meeting scheduled for <br />November 18. Boston Edison, Boston Gas and Stop and Shop are ready for Y2K. <br />Steve Tripi said he had read the article in last week's paper concerning the Board not speaking in <br />unison. He indicated the way the article came off to him was that the Chairman was telling <br />Board members how to talk to the Press and that they do not speak at meetings because they <br />don't want the public to know what they are thinking. He said he read the article as saying the <br />Chairman doesn't want Board Members to speak without the Chairman's approval. <br />Mr. Enrich explained that was not what he intended to convey. For the most part the story in the <br />Minute Man was an accurate reporting of what occurred at our meeting and my subsequent <br />conversation with the reporter. The one point that you raised about members being silent at <br />meetings for fear of being misquoted in the Press was not really what I intended to say and not <br />what I believe I said. I believe what I said was that some members are hesitant about speaking <br />with the Press. If that is not what I said, that is what I intended to say and I do think that is the <br />case. I think there is a judgment that each member needs to make for themselves. I know that <br />was one of the hardest things I had to learn to do was to talk with the Press in a way that I felt <br />comfortable about both being open and accessible and honest and at the same time not finding <br />myself taken out of context or misinterpreted. That was not dealing with the Lexington Press, <br />but the Boston Press which may be of a somewhat different issue. The basic thrust of the <br />remarks that I made in our meeting a couple of weeks ago was not in any way to suggest that any <br />member shouldn't speak to the Press or should not in any way withhold their own views from the <br />Press. It was rather that in speaking to the Press it is very important to draw the distinction <br />between speaking on behalf of and representing the positions of the Board and speaking for and <br />representing oneself as an individual. The concern was that several of the comments that were <br /> <br />