Laserfiche WebLink
60 -318 <br />ff <br />Selectmen's Meeting - July 1, 1996 - <br />Shall legislation be requested by the Town of Lexington which would require atown -wide <br />referendum vote for the approval of anyfiscal year budget, exclusive o, f line items funded by <br />enterprisefunds, which exceeds the prior year's budget by more than 3 percent? <br />Ms. Eddison asks what trigger would be? Costly? <br />Mr. Cohen stated that if the budget went up more than 3 percent from year to year it would <br />trigger the referendum each year. Then there would have to be an election. If this non- binding <br />referendum were to pass at the election in 1997 then it would be up to Mr. Tripi (if Selectmen did <br />not do) to sponsor a warrant article in which it would be written to authorize the Board of <br />Selectmen to petition the general court for an act to permit this and then it would have to g o to <br />the legislature to pass the act before this could all come into play. <br />An election will cost between $12,000 and $16,000. <br />We either accept the ten signatures or Mr. Tripi goes out and gets 10 percent of registered voters <br />(approximately 2000). The basic question is do we want to put Mr. Tripi through the process of <br />getting 2000 signatures. <br />Mr. Busa asked if this is exclusive of enterprise funding and if.line items would be exempt from <br />this referendum. only interested in Budget; basically article 4. <br />Non - binding means it does not have to be adhered to. This type of question can only be <br />implemented by having a town meeting to give the Selectmen permission to request an act of a <br />legislature, etc. our limited town meeting act, as in almost any town, allows referendums but it <br />specifically says it will not apply to the budget, because of policy reasons. <br />The referendum in question would not affect proposition 2-112. <br />Mr. Dailey suggested that the Board take a vote on the referendum question at the next meeting <br />and in the meantime invite comments from the Appropriations Committee and the Capital <br />Expenditures Committee. Maybe we can take a look and see what the increases have been over <br />the last years and what impact this type of limit would have on the last five years to give us an <br />idea of what would occur if this were in place. <br />Mr. white is to contact the appropriate parties about what is going on and see what the <br />ramifications would be. <br />