|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2000-07-03-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000-07-03-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:30:11 PM
Creation date
8/11/2010 11:05:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JULY 3, 2000 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 7:3 S p.m. by Chairman Colman, with members Bridge- Denzak, Davies, Galaitsis, Merrill, <br />Planning Director Garber, Assistant Planner McCall- Taylor and Intern Adrianne Ralph present. <br />******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** REPORTS ******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Planning Board, Subcommittees <br />Ad Hoc Tree Committee Ms. Bridge - Denzak reported that she has been named chair of the Selectmen's <br />new Ad Hoc Tree Committee. The group discussed its goals at its most recent meeting. Representatives of <br />the Department of Public Works also attended. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Lexington. Park Definitive Cluster Subdivision Plan, Halyard Builders, Decision Mr. Galaitsis chaired the <br />portion of the meeting dealing with Lexington Park as Mr. Colman did not participate in deliberations. The <br />Board reviewed a draft Certificate of Action dated July 3, 2000, prepared by the staff. After a brief <br />discussion, on the motion of Mr. Merrill, seconded by Mr. Davies, the Board approved the Certificate of <br />Action by a vote of 4 -0. Mr. Colman abstained. <br />The Board entered into a discussion of the draft Special Permit, dated July 3, prepared by the staff, Mr. <br />Merrill and Mr. Davies expressed satisfaction with the document and commented favorably on the whole <br />project., noting that the Planning Board's job is to encourage good projects, as well as prevent bad ones. <br />Ms. Bridge - Denzak would like to see further planting on the site. She believes that the site needs more <br />transition planting. The lack of trees to provide canopy is her concern. The Board agreed. On the motion of <br />Ms. Bridge - Denzak, seconded by Mr. Merrill, the Board voted, unanimously, to condition approval of the <br />special permit on the receipt of a refined landscaping plan, for the staff to review, that would show a net <br />increase in plant material, mostly trees. <br />Mr. Galaitsis suggested that a table be inserted in both the Certificate of Action and the Special Permit with <br />Site Plan Review decision indicating gross square feet and site coverage. Other members felt that such a <br />table would not be appropriate in the subdivision approval, but agreed to insert the table after #6 of the <br />General Conditions of the SPS. <br />In response to comments by Ms. Bridge- Denzak, Mr. Davies moved, and Mr. Merrill seconded, that as a <br />special condition that the developer shall, during the final design stage, make his best effort to seek <br />opportunities to lower the height of the units. The Board voted 4 -0 to support the motion. <br />Mr. Galaitsis expressed his negative reaction to the three -car garage shown on one of the proposed dwellings <br />and noted that another unit has a large barn. Mr. Davies responded that they are simply adaptations of the <br />houses to an owners' needs. He said that such things are outside of the Zoning By -Law's jurisdiction. <br />Ms. Bridge - Denzak commented that it may mean there will be more traffic and it further is a perception <br />problem, seeming to indicate more density. Mr. Davies responded again that it is an architectural issue, not a <br />zoning issue. Mr. Garber pointed out that architectural control is the purview of a whole other body of law. <br />Mr. Moloney stated that only one unit has a three -car garage. On the whole, the project is 20,000 square feet <br />under the allowed gross area. The overall impacts are proper for a cluster subdivision. He said he has no <br />wish to be adversarial, but he is very uncomfortable about someone saying that the owner can live without a <br />three -car garage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.