Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JUNE 7, 2000 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Vice Chairman Colman, with members Bridge - Denzak, Galaitsis, Merrill, <br />Planning Director Garber and Assistant Plamier McCall -- Taylor present. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Cotton Farm Cluster Subdivision off Marrett Road, Sketch Plan, Todd Cataldo Present for this item were <br />Todd Cataldo, the applicant, Richard Waitt, engineer, and Gary Larson, landscape architect. The purpose of <br />the discussion was to come to agreement on reserving public access to town -owned land when the proposed <br />subdivision is built. <br />Mr. Cataldo said that he wants to know where the Board sits on this issue as the fifty-foot no -build strip that <br />appears on the plan and on the deed is for our protection from what happens on the Town -owned land. It <br />was part of the land swap the Cataldos made with the Town a number of years ago. The Senior Center is <br />considering the site for its new location. Putting a road through in connection with a senior center there <br />would drastically change the character of the area. <br />Mr. Colman said the Board would consider it further at its next meeting. Mr. Cataldo said he would send the <br />document describing the no -build strip to the Planning Department. <br />Mr. Merrill said that cutting a road through is not desirable from a planning point of view and if part of the <br />land swap deal with Mr. Cataldo was that a road would not be built there, then that understanding should be <br />honored. <br />Responding to a suggestion in the Board's letter on the first sketch plan, Mr. Cataldo said that reducing the <br />number of houses further, to eight or nine, is not a viable option for him. <br />Mr. Larson commented that, as he understands it, the 650 -foot dead -end road length limit does not affect the <br />length of driveways to the properties. Ms McCaIl- Taylor responded that the driveway shown on the plan, <br />which services several proposed dwellings, is basically an "end -run" around the By -Law. It is not in the <br />sprit of what that limit is intended to accomplish. <br />Mr. Waitt said that he had recently attended an excellent Open Space subdivisions conference. He believes <br />that the plan being considered now responds to give the Board what it wants in a cluster layout. A <br />conventional layout would allow 19 units. He defended the two interior driveways and commented that the <br />design team needs certainty from the Board before the next plan is submitted <br />Mr. Colman responded that Mr. Waitt's comments are well taken. The Board will schedule 30 minutes at the <br />next Planning Board meeting, when John Davies is also present, to discuss the plan further. <br />Mr. Garber said that there is ambiguity that needs to be clarified in subsection 9.3.6.4. He also noted that <br />the extraction of 3.8 acres and the use of only single - family dwellings are problematic in the current plan. <br />Later in the meeting members commented that Mr. Cataldo is creating his own hardship. <br />246 Concord Avenue, Minor Modification, Masoud Sanayei Present for this item was Masoud Sanayei, <br />owner of one of the lots at 246 Concord Avenue, a 7.4.5, reduced frontage, subdivision. Mr. Garber <br />explained that one of the numbers cited in the special permit for the approved subdivision did not really <br />work out correctly in actuality. Mr. Sanayei wants to amend the living area, but not the footprint of the <br />