Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 26, 2000 <br />Chairman Colman called the meeting of the Lexington Planning Board, held in the Selectmen's Room Town <br />Office Building, to order at 7:35 p.m., with members Bridge - Denzak, Davies, Galaitsis, Merrill, Director of <br />Comprehensive Planning Bowyer, PIanning Director Garber and Assistant Planner McCall - Taylor present. <br />In addition, members of the Managing Growth and Open Space Working Group of the Vision 2020 Strategic <br />Planning Program were present for the second item on the agenda. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Land Use Element: Projects, Studies, Tasks <br />Occupancy Characteristics of Dwelling Units, Report on Staff Update The Board reviewed data about <br />occupancy characteristics of various housing types, which had been compiled by the staff. The data <br />compared the number of children generated by single - family dwellings and cluster types of housing, e.g., <br />semi - attached and attached dwelling. It had originally been created in connection with presenting the revised <br />Section 9, Residential Developments, of the Zoning By -Law, to Town Meeting in 1996. <br />It was agreed that an effort should be made to update and rerun the Alternative Housing Types database <br />when data from the 2000 Federal census becomes available. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * ** COORDINATION WITH OTHER BOARDS, COMMITTEES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Managing Growth and Open Space Working Group of the Vision 2020 Strategic Planning Program Mr. <br />Merrill opened discussion by explaining the concept behind the Vision 2020 process. Its broader input of a <br />20 year vision will provide a policy framework for the Town. He then yielded the floor to Thomas Harden, <br />chair of the Managing Growth and Open Space Working Group, who summarized the work of his group. <br />While it is a work in progress, he hopes that they will produce something useful. The group has identified <br />six overriding goals -- increase and protect open space; minimize traffic impacts; reduce environmental <br />impacts; preserve and enhance the town and neighborhood character; create a mix of housing; and, ensure <br />that decisions reflect broad, long -term, community -wide perspectives. At this point there is less consensus <br />around the objective and measures components. <br />Mr. Bowyer outlined the comprehensive plan which by state definition has six elements, the most pivotal <br />being land use. Lexington's approach is both top -down and bottom up. Starting by examining lots with <br />development potential, it will eventually focus on town wide policies. For that there will need to be a better <br />town -wide definition of what the town needs are. This is where the Managing Growth group can be of <br />assistance. Mr. Bowyer pointed out that the Zoning By -Law is riddled with policies. It is time to shine a <br />light on the policies and re- evaluate them. <br />This precipitated a discussion of various issues in town, including mansionization, development of single <br />lots, and transportation demand management. Ms. Bridge- Denzak said she was concerned about things that <br />contribute to the character of a town or neighborhood -- materials, stone walls, trees and sidewalks. <br />Mr. Colman said that the Growth Management work group and the Planning Board should continue to work <br />together. It is hoped that there will be articles to put forth at the 2001 Town Meeting. Mr. Garber pointed <br />out that there are many implementation tools available in addition to the Zoning By -Law, such as <br />development regulations, general by -laws, design guidelines, and state regulations. <br />Mr. Harden asked the Board to respond to the idea of a denser downtown. This led to a discussion of a <br />parking structure. <br />Mr. Merrill asked whether there were areas on which the Managing Growth group had no consensus. They <br />responded that there was still debate on open space acquisition of large tracts versus small neighborhood <br />