Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JULY 18, 2001 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Galaitsis with members Bridge - Denzak, Chase, Davies, Harden, <br />Planning Director Garber, and Secretary Tap present. Assistant Planner McCall- Taylor was away on <br />vacation. <br />* * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />32 Roosevelt Road Definitive Special Residential Development, Ronald Lopez CONTINUED PUBLIC <br />HEARING: Present for this item were Mr. Ronald Lopez, North Sbore Construction and Development, <br />applicant; Mr. Edmund Grant, attorney; Mr. Daniel Harrington, attorney; Mr. Dylan James, Meridian <br />Engineering, Inc., engineer. There were a dozen people in the audience. <br />Mr. Grant remarked that density seems to be the issue, even though Mr. Lopez has made a good faith <br />effort to satisfy the Board's desire for fewer units. And he compared the modest size units that Mr. Lopez <br />is planning to build to the current high square footage of new construction in Lexington He wondered <br />why six units still is a problem for the Board. <br />Mr. Galaitsis countered that the real issue is not density so much as it is the high amount of impervious <br />surface. He asked for questions from the Board. Mr. Davies asked if the applicant had considered six units <br />in two building, instead of three buildings so the open space would not be so fractured. Mr. Lopez <br />answered in the affirmative. He also said that the open space is more like the existing neighborhood in the <br />three - building layout. The units would be taller than those in the current plan, where most of the living <br />area is on one floor, and not an optimal design for empty - nesters. <br />Mr. Harden expressed a concern, also voiced by the neighbors, about impacts on the trees between <br />Wilson Road and Mr. Lopez's project. He asked .Mr. Lopez to clarify where the limit of work line would <br />be. Mr. Lopez noted that though there are two places where work will be close to the abutters' properties, <br />most of the vegetation is outside his property lines. <br />Mr. Galaitsis asked if the proposed decks are considered impervious surfaces. The answer was no. He <br />also asked if Mr. Lopez would agree to install pull -down stairs to the attic. Mr. Lopez agreed to this. <br />Regarding the proposed decks, Mr. Davies said they are "pervious" surfaces. Ms. Bridge - Denzak stated <br />her disagreement with this. Mr. Garber offered to look into the issue. <br />Ms Bridge - Denzak shared Mr. Galaitsis' concern about site coverage. In this project, the interior drive <br />was not part of the impact calculation for impervious surface. Mr. Galaitsis said that in future projects the <br />Board will make it clear that the interior drive will be used in the calculation. <br />Landscape Plan: <br />Mr. Harden pointed out that the open space in this development will act as a buffer against Rt. 951128, <br />more than as usable open space. Ms. Bridge - Denzak regrets the extent to which the site will be disturbed <br />during implementation. Ms. Chase suggested turning the building closest to Roosevelt Road slightly <br />toward the circle so the blank end of the house does not face the street. Mr. Harden suggested that the <br />street view of the house could be improved with architectural details; turning the house would not be <br />needed. <br />Mr. Galaitsis suggested reducing the amount of visitor parking. Mr. Lopez said that the neighbors don't <br />want cars parked on the Roosevelt Road circle. Attorney Harrington stated that Mr. Lopez could get eight <br />units on the site. He further stated that if the Board is unhappy with the open space they should repeal the <br />