|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2001-06-20-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001-06-20-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:30:28 PM
Creation date
8/11/2010 9:17:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF R NTE 20, 2001 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, <br />began at 7:35 p-m. with Chairman Galaitsis, members, Chase, Davies, Harden, Planning Director Garber, <br />and Assistant Planner McCall - Taylor present. Ms. Bridge- Denzak was absent. Philip Herr and Sarah <br />Jaynes, of Herr and James and Associates, planning consultants, were also present and co-led the <br />evening's discussions. Members of the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee -- Tom DeNoto, Karl <br />Kastorf, Joyce Miller, Wendy Manz, Larry Belvin, Lee Sinai, and Susan Solomon were present as well as <br />Elaine Dratch, Marilyn Fenellosa, Iris Wheaton, Ada Wong, Fred Johnson and Eileen Entin. <br />COMPREIIENSIFVE PLANNING ** * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * ** * ** <br />Infill Housing Pho Project Members of the Planning Board and the Comprehensive Plan <br />Advisory Committee had been divided into five groups and assigned a section of Lexington — north, <br />south, east, west and central_ Given panoramic one -use cameras, their assignment was to document infill <br />housing in Lexington, taking pictures of infill houses that they felt "worked" in their neighborhood and <br />others that did not "work_" <br />Mr. Galaitsis introduced the team leaders, each of whom presented their group's photographs, which had <br />been mounted on a presentation board, and explained why their examples were chosen, why certain <br />houses blended in or enhanced the neighborhood while other did not. The asseinbled participants <br />discussed their reactions and thoughts and began to list common themes and elements that came out of the <br />exercise, including criticism, concerns about and approval of some of the infill houses_ Comments were as <br />follows: <br />Themes <br />East Lexington: Torn Harden <br />Is the house in scale with its neighbors? <br />Were trees preserved? Trees mitigate a lot. <br />Is the house sited well in relation to the topography? <br />Architectural critique avoided. <br />Why do Moon Hill, Five Fields, Turning Mill, and other areas, avoid teardowns? Joyce Miller <br />Topography <br />Mature trees <br />Improved streets <br />Covenants limiting additions <br />Houses interspersed with open space. <br />North Lexington: Iris Wheaton <br />Some are in poor taste due to style incompatibility <br />Some good examples are rustic, wooded, and don't overwhelm the site. <br />Some big houses meld nl; most don't_ <br />Mansions change the scale of a neighborhood. <br />Some big new houses turn their backs on the neighborhood. <br />Neighborliness is no longer an asset. <br />Even the smallest lots are being built on. <br />Whole neighborhoods are being nearly destroyed. <br />Change character of neighborhood <br />Change sense of community- camaraderie <br />Trees, scale, character, lot coverage, pavement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.