|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2002-05-22-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002-05-22-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:30:45 PM
Creation date
8/10/2010 3:34:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 22, 2002 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 6:04 p.m. by Acting Chairman Harden, with members Davies, Kastorf and planning <br />staff Garber, McCall- Taylor, and Tap present. Mr. Galaitsis and Ms. Chase were absent. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />King: Street Conventional Two-lot Subdivision, Taylor Made Carpentry, PLUBLICHEARING Present for <br />this item were Mr. Daniel Taylor, the applicant, Mr. David Goslin, engineer, and Mr. Christopher <br />Emilius, engineer, of GEOD Engineering. Mr. Harden gave a brief overview of the progress of the King <br />Street subdivision thus far in the permitting process and then gave the floor to Mr. Emilius. <br />Mr. Emilius described how the plan before the Board tonight responds to the Board's comments on the <br />previous sketch plan. The number of lots has been reduced from three to two. He went through the locus, <br />site analysis and the utility plans and described in some detail the storm water drainage plan. A hydrant <br />has been added, according to the wishes of the Fire Department. He said that the storm water management <br />system is designed to contain all of the runoff on site. The landscape plan shows mixed plantings in the <br />cul -de sac and white pines elsewhere. <br />Improvement of King Street Mr. Emilius said that his research revealed a X1857 plan of King Street <br />showing a 20 -foot right of way_ Another surveyor, Hayes Engineering, offered another approach, which <br />they incorporated in the version shown tonight. Those revisions are not on the plan the staff and Board <br />reviewed. The plan shows pavement 18 feet wide the full length of King Street, with curbing on both <br />sides and two utility poles installed within the right- ofway They propose putting a crown on kern Street <br />that would direct runoff to a catch basin at the foot of Fern Street. (In answer to a later question from Mr. <br />Kastorf, Mr. Emilius said that they had not yet analyzed the flow of water down Fern Street.) <br />Questions from the Planning Board Mr. Davies asked if the plan's boundaries line up with those of the <br />abutting properties. Mr_ Goslin said that the abutters would have to hire a surveyor to determine that <br />because various plans over 200 years show varying survey landmarks. The current plan shows the road <br />centered on the existing King Street pavement. <br />Mr. Kastorf asked why they did not request a waiver from the curbing requirement, as so much more <br />water will be running off the additional impervious surface. Mr. Emilius replied that the Board previously <br />said they wanted curbing. Ms. McCall- Taylor said that the curbing shown does not meet Lexington's <br />standard detail specifications_ <br />Questions from the audience Ms. Judith Jackson, 18 Bridle Path, asked if the development's effects ota <br />properties along Bridle Path have been assessed_ She said that there is a great deal of ledge in the area_ <br />Mr. Emilius replied that he had not encountered any ledge in his deep pit tests and that water runoff <br />would actually be less due 'to the new drainage system. Ms. Jackson also asked how big the proposed <br />houses would be and if their size had been factored into the drainage calculations. Mr_ Emilius said that <br />the size of the catch basins could be enlarged as needed. <br />In response to a question, Ms. McCall - Taylor said that upkeep of the road would be the responsibility of <br />the abutters and that it was quite unlikely that the Town would ever accept the street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.