Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 22, 2002 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Carpenter Room, National Heritage Museum, <br />was called to order at 6:50 p.m. by Chairman Galaitsis with members, Chase, Davies, Harden, Kastorf <br />and planning staff Garber, McCall- Taylor, and Tyson present <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2002 TOWN MEETING <br />Article 20 Sections E and F : The Board discussed the presentation that would be made by Mr. Harden <br />to explain the changes in the definition of height. The planning staff and Mr. Harden had developed a <br />slide show, with input by the other members. A script of the presentation was reviewed. Mr. Harden <br />urged members to answer any questions that they felt comfortable with, rather than leaving all for him to <br />answer. <br />Mr. Garber reported that he expected Mr. Peter Kelly to offer an amendment to the motion that would <br />raise the maximum allowed height in residential districts to 44'. The Board members felt that this would <br />essentially cancel out any gains in controlling height that would be garnered by the change in the <br />definition of how height is measured. The sense was that they were opposed to such a move but they <br />would take an official stand once the amendment was brought forward on the Town Meeting floor. <br />The Board also reviewed the handout produced by Mr. Jon Himmel. They thought it would reinforce their <br />presentation as it provided additional concrete examples of building heights, including local historic <br />structures. <br />Mr. Kastorf said that in the future the Board should consider tapping Town Meeting members to lobby for <br />amendments relating to mansionizati.on. The real estate /developer group had effectively rallied residents <br />to lobby Town Meeting members this time. Mr. Kastorf said that the down side to such an approach <br />might be a more radical approach. He felt that what the Planning Board had proposed this year had been <br />fairly mild and had not galvanized supporters. <br />Reconsideration of Article 20 was discussed. It was the sentiment of the Board that they would not ask for <br />reconsideration of the Article as a whole but might consider reconsideration of the height section if the <br />vote was very close this evening and there appeared to be an information void that could be addressed. <br />Article 21, Codification Mr. Galaitsis will present the report and motion and then ask that Ms. McCall - <br />Taylor be recognized to speak further on the subject. Members felt that this would be a non, controversial <br />article as Town Meeting had already approved codification last year. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Applications To Be Heard on April 22, 2002: Mr. Kastorf gave an oral review of the following <br />applications: <br />■ 1709 -1727 Massachusetts Avenue special permit to operate a frill service restaurant, including <br />take -out service in the CB district AND a variance from the parking requirement <br />6 Patterson Road variance in order to construct a new two -car garage which will have a 14 foot <br />side yard set back and a 17.7 foot front yard setback. <br />The Board was favorably disposed towards the application for a variance from the parking requirements <br />at 1709 -1723 Massachusetts Avenue. Members felt that it would result in more parking spaces being <br />