Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH b, 2002 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the CIarke Middle School auditorium, 17 Stedman <br />Road, Lexington, was called to order at 7:45 p.m. by Chairman Galaitsis with members, Chase, Davies, <br />Kastorf and planning staff Garber, McCall- Taylor, and Tap present. Mr. Harden was absent due to illness. <br />There were approximately 300 people in the audience. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2002 TOWN MEETING <br />Article 20, Zoning By -Law, House Impact Review, Public Hearing Mr. Galaitsis opened the hearing at <br />7:45. He welcomed the audience, saying that it was good to see so much interest in the proposed house <br />impact review zoning amendment. He asked for a show of hands by people who were there due to <br />concern about additions to existing houses. A significant number of hands went up. Mr. Galaitsis <br />explained that the proposed amendment would not affect additions to houses in existence before June 1, <br />2002. He invited everyone to an additional hearing on this same proposed amendment on March 20, <br />before giving the floor to Planning Director Garber. <br />Mr. Garber described the Planning Board's continuing efforts to gather and analyze data about <br />Lexington's existing and newly built housing stock. He said the Board has made a commitment to make <br />changes to the version of the proposed by -law that was published in the Town Warrant. He also reiterated <br />that the amendment would not affect additions to existing houses. <br />Mr. Garber and Assistant Director McCall- Taylor made a detailed PowerPoint presentation using <br />Lexington housing data to illustrate the effect of the house impact review amendment if it is adopted. He <br />said the intent was to "capture" only the most extreme cases. Looking at current housing stock, only <br />about 2.8 percent would be above the threshold. (A printed version of the PowerPoint show and other <br />data were available to the audience as handouts at this hearing.) <br />Mr. Garber described the history of the impetus behind the development of this by -law proposal. It arose <br />out of resident concern revealed during the Selectmen's Vision 2020 process and current comprehensive <br />plan focus groups and working sessions. Residents believe that community character and diversity are <br />being lost when moderately sized houses and many trees are removed to make way for large houses. He <br />explained some of the mechanisms surrounding towns are using and why some of those work and some <br />do not. <br />What the Planning Board is proposing in Article 20, House impact Review, is a system based on <br />Lexington- specific data, using the concept of gross floor area, data that can be found in the Assessors <br />database. It does not limit house size per se but subjects to site plan review new houses that would be <br />above defined thresholds of size. Mr. Garber acknowledged the consternation of the development <br />community over when the by -law would take effect if passed and the perceived negative effects of the <br />review process on development cost and time. <br />Mr. Galaitsis thanked the staff for the effort they have put into developing the housing data. He invited <br />comment from public officials, then from other members of the audience. <br />Mr. Daniel Busa, town meeting member, precinct 1, said that he thinks that the term gross floor area <br />(GFA) is misleading. He believes that living area is a more familiar concept. He also said that he has <br />heard from a number of residents who feel excluded from the Planning Board's process vis a vis Article <br />20. Mr. Garber explained that GFA is being used because using living area in the article would likely <br />trigger an adverse attorney general ruling. <br />