|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2003-07-23-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003-07-23-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:31:01 PM
Creation date
8/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JULY 23, 2003 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Harden with members Chase, Davies, Galaitsis, Kastorf and <br />planning staff Garber, McCall - Taylor, and Tap present. <br />****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINUTES <br />Review of Minutes The Board reviewed and corrected the minutes for the meeting of July 9, 2003. On a <br />motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the minutes as amended. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Olde Smith Farm Cluster Subdivision Amended Plan, Stabile Companies Having approved the minor <br />amendment to the Olde Smith Farm Cluster Subdivision at the conclusion of the public hearing on May <br />14, 2003, and having received the Town Cleric's certification that no appeals were filed within the 20 -day <br />appeal period, the Board endorsed the amended subdivision plans. <br />Rangeway Road Extension Definitive Subdivision Plan, Mr. James Public Hearing Mr. <br />Harden opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Present for this item were Mr. James Raymond, applicant; <br />Mr. Fred Russell, designing engineer; and Mrs. Doris Duff, owner of the property. There were 10 people <br />in the audience. <br />Mr. Russell presented a definitive plan showing an extension of Rangeway Road to provide frontage for a <br />20,483 square foot lot and the construction of one single - family house with a two -car garage and an 18- <br />foot pavement width with a turnaround that extends outside of the existing right -of -way. The garage did <br />not appear on the preliminary plan. Waivers of the development regulations are sought. Conditions of the <br />preliminary plan approval were: applicant would offer a deed restriction limiting the gross floor area and <br />footprint of the dwelling to the approximate area shown on the preliminary site construction plan; a <br />turnaround sufficient for a fire truck; and, a commitment to implement improvements to the existing <br />Rangeway Road from the applicant's lot to Skyview Road. <br />Board Questions and Comments: Ms. McCall - Taylor, responding to Mr. Harden's question about a <br />letter from town counsel, said that the Board has three choices in this case and cases like this: 1) do not <br />approve any waivers; 2) approve the road without a turnaround; 3) approve the road with a turnaround on <br />the applicant's property, which would then require a variance of lot size from the Zoning Board. of <br />Appeals. This latter approach would also raises the question of the grandfathering of the lot as it could be <br />argued that a new lot had been created. Mr. Russell commented that a road extension like the one he <br />proposes on Rangeway was approved for James Street. Mr. Harden pointed out that no two cases are <br />identical and that the Board has the authority to judge each on its merits and individual conditions. <br />The mechanics of a deed restriction on the size of the house were discussed. Mr. Raymond said he was <br />willing to do without the garage and to offer a deed restriction on the size of the house. Mr. Kastorf said <br />that the addition of a 24' by 24' garage, which resulted in a substantial widening of the building, was <br />moving in the opposite direction from what the Board had wanted. Mr. Davies recalled that on the site <br />walk saving trees on the site seemed paramount to the participants, but the garage and a larger storm <br />water management system shown on the definitive plan would require much tree cutting. He also <br />questioned the steepness of a "rip- rapped" slope. Mr. Harden commented that the driveway was being <br />raised approximately six feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.