Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 30, 2003 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in. the Carpenter Room of the National Heritage Museum, <br />was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Vice Chairman Harden with members Davies, Galaitsis, Kastorf and <br />planning staff Garber, and McCall - Taylor present. Ms. Chase joined the meeting during the discussion of the <br />Zoning Board of Appeals cases. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Applications To Be Heard on Mays 8, 2003 Mr. Kastorf gave an oral review of the following applications: <br />a 6 Hancock Avenue — Variance from font and side yard setbacks to construct an addition to a single - <br />family dwelling (continued from March 27, 2003) <br />a 60 Bedford Street — Walgreen's — Special permit to install a new, freestanding, monument -style sign. <br />0 2600 Massachusetts Avenue — United Methodist Church — Special Permit to install a new standing sign. <br />0 9 Russell Road — Variance from side yard setback to construct an addition to a single - family dwelling. - <br />0 55 Taft Avenue — Variance from lot area and gross floor area minimums, and a special permit for the <br />conversion of a one- family dwelling into a two- family dwelling <br />a 1666 Massachusetts Avenue — Nicky's Ice Cream & Delectables — Modification of an existing special <br />permit to allow seating <br />0 4 royal Circle — Special Permit to construct a tennis court with lighting (continued from March 13, <br />2003 ) <br />The Board had no comments to forward to the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br />ARTICLES FOR 2003 TOWN MEETING <br />Article 25 Mr. Harden distributed three versions of a possible Planning Board statement on Article 25 <br />concerning the sale or lease of the Public Works facility property at 201 Bedford Street. He recommended <br />that the latest version be used. Mr. Davies said brevity was important. Mr. Kastorf brought up the point that <br />there was potential conflict for the Planning Board to be involved as a regulator of the development after the <br />property is disposed when it has participated in the disposition process. On a motion by Mr. Davies, <br />seconded by Mr. Kastorf the Board voted 5 -0 to support Article 14 and not support Article 25. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMTNISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Glen Road South, Sketch Plan — Dylan James and Jason Himick of Meridian Associates and property owners <br />John Oberteuffer and Katherine Mockett were present to discuss their plans for 14 Glen Road South, at the <br />corner of Grant Street. The lot is 101,300 square feet with an existing Historic house on the upper portion. <br />There are wetlands in the southeast corner and steep slopes dividing the lot in the middle. The plans <br />presented were to create two additional house lots, while retaining the existing house. Mr. James said they <br />had looked at two concepts using generic footprints to test grading, etc. This had lead them to favor concept <br />B that had frontage on Grant Street for both of the additional lots. The houses would both front on Grant <br />Street and relate to that neighborhood. <br />Board questions and comments - Mr. Kastorf asked about the common open space and Mr. James said that it <br />was the wooded area and would remain in private ownership. Mr. Davies, commenting on the status of Glen <br />Road South said that there were street signs and that it was passable. Mr. Galaitsis ask what could be done as <br />of right and was told that they could lay out a road to create frontage and still get three lots. Mr. Galaitsis <br />said that if the development is to be in keeping with the character of the Grant Street neighborhood would <br />that include the size of the houses? Mr. James said the houses will be larger than most but there is some <br />replacement housing taking place. He noted that the houses have been sited with the narrower face toward <br />the street, unlike the usual box- shaped colonial. <br />