Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2003 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Carpenter Room of the National Heritage <br />Museum, was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Galaitsis with members Chase, Davies, Harden., <br />Kastorf and planning staff Garber and McCall- Taylor present. <br />MINUTES <br />Review of Minutes The Board reviewed the minutes for the meetings of February 5 executive session, <br />March 12 and 19 and April. 14, 2003. On the motion of Mr. Davies, seconded by .Mr. Harden, it was <br />voted unanimously 5 -0 to approve the minutes for February 5 executive session, March 12 and April 14, <br />2003, as amended. The minutes of March 19 will be corrected and brought back to the next meeting. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT <br />Mr. Garber informed the members that Elissa Tap had agreed to be the recording secretary for the <br />Selectmen's Meetings. She had arranged back -up coverage if needed. This work will be done in addition <br />to her Planning Board position, <br />Article 12 — This article will be indefinitely postponed. <br />Article 14 -- Mr. Davies said that it was his understanding that the article would ask for $30,000 to be <br />appropriated for architectural programs and schematics. Mr. Harden said that given the discussions about <br />the Worthen Road site that had been on the TMMA e -mail that afternoon such studies could be helpful. <br />There was a question of whether a senior center would even fit on the site. Ms. Chase wondered about <br />how useful a programmatic design unrelated to a site would be, and how much it might cost. Mr. Davies <br />said that something worthwhile could be done for $10,000 but he doesn't want to have the Council on <br />Aging have to wait a year if they get a site, so he thinks releasing $30,000 would be fine. Board member <br />speculated about what the money would be used for. Ms. Davison who was in the audience and has been <br />active on the siting committee, said that they wanted a program analysis with square footage <br />requirements, a spaces need analysis for a senor /community center. Ms. McCall- Taylor referred the <br />members to the memo from Mr. LaPointe which outlined the tasks the money would be used for as <br />follows: validate the social services and activities that the senior center should provide; confirm space <br />needs; and, develop the architectural program and create alternative conceptual building and site designs. <br />Mr. Kastorf asked if there was a planning issue in this and Mr. Harden responded that if asked, the <br />Planning Board could endorse the article. On the motion of Mr. Kastorf, seconded by Mr. Harden, the <br />Board voted that if the Planning Board is asked for a position on Article 14 they should respond that it <br />represents careful planning and it should trove forward. The motion passed 5 -0. <br />Article 25 — Mr. Kastorf asked if it were true that the Planning Board would not be asked for a report <br />during the discussion scheduled for the recess. Ms. McCall- Taylor said it was her understanding that that <br />was the case and that Town Meeting would not vote on the motion until the next session. Mr. Kastorf <br />suggested putting the article aside until Wednesday night, after they had heard the discussion. Mr. <br />Galaitsis suggested making comments tonight but not voting. Mr. Harden said that the substantive issue <br />here is the traffic issue generated by moving the DPW to Hartwell Avenue. Mr. Galaitsis said it is hard to <br />know what to say without a traffic study of some sort. Mr. Galaitsis expressed concern that it might give <br />political ammunition to Hanscom if the town were to allow more traffic on Hartwell Avenue. Mr. Davies <br />said he felt it was worth it to move the DPW and free up the Bedford Street site. Mr. Harden said that if <br />this were a commercial proposal it probably would not pass, traffic would be a major concern and traffic <br />studies would be required. Tlie consensus was to defer a vote on the article. <br />