|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2003-03-19-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003-03-19-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:31:00 PM
Creation date
8/10/2010 10:24:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 19, 2003 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Room, Town Office Building, was <br />called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Galaitsis with members Chase, Davies, Harden., Kastorf and <br />planning staff Garber, McCall- Taylor, and Tap present. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2003 TOWN MEETING <br />Article 21, Resolution on Comprehensive Permit Procedures, Ms. Judith Uhrig Mr. Galaitsis recognized <br />Ms. fudith Uhrig, member of the Board of Appeals, wh.o asked to speak with the Board about Article 21, <br />a citizens' petition. The petition asks Torun Meeting to adopt a resolution urging the Board of Appeals <br />(ZBA) to apply current MassHousing land acquisition guidelines as a condition to granting a <br />Comprehensive Permit Permits. She said she was mostly concerned with the perception of what is going <br />on. with. Article 21. The relationship of the Planning Board and Board of Appeals has improved in recent <br />years and she feels that relationship would be damaged if the Planning Board supports Article 21, in <br />essence telling the Board of Appeals bow to conduct its business. <br />Mr. Harden responded that his concern is that the Board of Appeals should be provided with a more <br />uniform and precise tool to help them with future 40B proposals, which he believes Article 21 would do. <br />Ms. Chase made analogy to the historic preservation guidelines, which help decision — making bodies. <br />Mr. Galaitsis recused himself and left the room as he is one of the abutters to the 536 -540 Lowell Street <br />Comprehensive Permit project. <br />Mr. Kastorf commented that the Planning Board and Board of Appeals would be working together on the <br />Met State Hospital development when it comes to Town Meeting next year. He wondered if they should <br />have joint meetings? Ms. Uhrig agreed that the two boards should work together on a process and <br />suggested that a representative of the one Board could attend a meeting of the other on the subject (or vice <br />versa) but in an informational, not advisory, role. <br />After Ms. Uhrig left the meeting, the Board endeavored to come to an agreement on a statement to make <br />at Town Meeting about Article 21. <br />STAFF REPORTS <br />Land Use Reform Act, Update Mr. Garber reported that the "heavy hitters" —both for and against the <br />Land Use Reform Act are beginning then lobbying. He said that the Act will have profound and much <br />needed effects if it is passed as it would curtail many special interest exemptions in the Zoning Act and <br />the Subdivision Control Law. It seems to be gaining momentum but will need every bit of support <br />possible. <br />Mr. Galaitsis rejoined the meeting. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2003 TOWN MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Article 18, Ledgemont Rezoning, Revised PSDUP The Board reviewed the amended Preliminary Site <br />Development and Use Plan for The Beal Companies' petition to rezone its land at Spring Street and <br />Hayden Avenue. Ms. McCall - Taylor listed the main changes: <br />® The building is ten feet less in height <br />® One layer of the parking structure has been eliminated <br />® Increased land put under conservations easement <br />After some discussion the Board agreed, however, that their initial reactions to the proposal have not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.