Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 3, 2004 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room 227 of the Clarke Middle School, was called <br />to order at 7:10.m. by Chairman Harden with members Davies, Galaitsis, Kastorf, Manz and planning <br />staff McCall- Taylor present. <br />****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINUTES ******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Review of Minutes The Board postponed review of the minutes until the next meeting. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />PLANS NOT REQUIRING APPROVAL UNDER THE SUBDIVISION CONTROL LAW <br />Marrett Road at Tufts Road, Approval Not Required Plan 2004 -1: The Board endorsed a second original <br />of an Approval Not Required Plan for land at Marrett and Tufts Roads. As there was Land Court land <br />involved there needed to be two originals, one for the Registry and one for Land Court. The other <br />original had been signed on January 14, 2004. The members endorsed the plan entitled "Plan of Land in <br />Lexington in Mass., dated December 8, 2003, prepared and certified by James R. Keenan, Professional <br />Land Surveyor, Winchester, Mass., submitted by Glenn Comeau, as it does not require approval under the <br />Subdivision Control Law. <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ARTICLES FOR 2004 TOWN MEETING <br />Articles 12 and 13 — Metropolitan State Hospital Redevelopment — The Board received various <br />correspondence on these matters, including a proposed amendment to Article 13 by Steven Heinrich. Mr. <br />Heinrich's amendment would limit the development to no more than 331 units. <br />Mr. Harden reported that the Appropriations Committee was voting on a recommendation on Article 13 <br />that evening. The Committee had already spent some amount of time discussing the report put together <br />by Loren Wood critiquing the fiscal analysis. Mr. Kastorf said that AvalonBay had appeared to address <br />the issues raised by Mr. Wood in considerable detail. Ms. McCall - Taylor said that the Planning Director <br />Mr. Garber was at the Appropriations Committee, which was meeting concurrently, in order to answer <br />questions. The Board discussed the issue of fiscal neutrality and felt that it was important to emphasize <br />that fiscal neutrality was a goal, not a requirement. Mr. Kastorf reported that in talking with people who <br />had read the Planning Board's report, many had commented that they had not realized that fiscal <br />neutrality was not a requirement. He also said that he was amazed at how positive people were about <br />both the project and the Board's report. <br />Mr. Harden said that he would continue to worry about the fiscal piece and that the Appropriations <br />Committee report will carry a lot of weight. <br />The Board then discussed the process that would be followed at Town Meeting as Ed Grant, on behalf of <br />AvalonBay, would be offering an amendment to the PSDUP that would incorporate the latest mitigation <br />offers and the change in unit mix. Ms. McCall - Taylor said that there was an issue of a covenant as well as <br />amendments to the PSDUP. She reported that Town Counsel wants many of the special conditions <br />removed from the PSDUP and placed in a covenant instead. This is still being debated between the <br />attorneys. Members felt that the changes expressed in the Grant amendment would be important selling <br />points for the project and should come first before the Heinrich amendment. <br />Mr. Harden said that the Board would have to take a position on the 331 —unit proposal. He said it was <br />unusual for the Planning Board to not be advocating for reduced density but the benefit of being above the <br />40B threshold for several decades is a strong argument for the 387 units. Mr. Kastorf said that <br />