Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 31, 2004 <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room 227, Clarke Middle School, was called <br />to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Harden with members Davies, Galaitsis, Kastorf, Manz and planning <br />staff Garber and McCall - Taylor. Also present were Ms. Liz Smith, Mr. Michael Roberts, Mr. John <br />Connery for AvalonBay Communities, Inc., Mr. Al Levine of the Appropriations Committee, and Mr. <br />Bob Bicknell of the Housing Partnership. <br />ARTICLES FOR 2004 TOWN MEETING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Article 13, Rezone Met State Hospital Pro <br />John Connery, a consultant to AvalonBay, gave a brief review of his fiscal analysis of the proposed <br />AvalonBay development at the Metropolitan State Hospital site. He focused on the tax revenue <br />projections, explaining the various methodologies that could be used. He used the rents at the Lexington <br />Ridge apartment complex as a basis for determining an assessed value. He assumed an assessed value of <br />$76,000,000. He pointed out that this analysis had been given a peer review by Larry Koff and <br />Associates and that they had found it valid. <br />Mr. Levin who had come on behalf of the Appropriations Committee had some questions about how the <br />value was determined. He asked about how this projected value compared to other existing <br />developments. Mr. Roberts explained that they had made adjustments based on the age of the buildings; <br />generally there is a decrease in income while expenses increase over time. He had also looked at what <br />was happening in AvalonBay's newly constructed project in Newton. <br />The board members expressed their desire to be able to go before Town Meeting being able to say they <br />had confidence in the numbers and in order to do that they may need some more figures. <br />Mr. Galaitsis wondered why it was so difficult for AvalonBay to provide a short-term guarantee of <br />revenue neutrality. He pointed out that a number that might be large for the town would be relatively <br />small for a large company like AvalonBay. If there were a guarantee it would get rid of many of the <br />questions. Mr. Roberts said that the project would be fiscally neutral. Mr. Levin asked if the planning <br />board were willing to put a dollar amount on the benefits. Mr. Harden said that there is a risk framework <br />— there is a good chance the project will be revenue neutral and there are risks to turning it down. <br />The discussion turned to controlling impacts by controlling the number of school -aged children. Mr. <br />Levin said that the number of age - restricted units could be increased but then family housing is lost. Mr.. <br />Kastorf raised the problem of school -aged children "back - filling" units vacated by older residents if there <br />are too many age - restricted units drawing people from existing residences. Mr. Levine said that if an <br />older person or family is going to move out there is no way to ascribe it to this development. Mr. Roberts <br />said his experience is people make the decision to move out first, and then decide where to move. <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn at 7:55 <br />PP <br />ohn L. Davies, Clerk <br />