Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 7, 2004 <br />The meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G -15, Town Office Building, was called to <br />order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Harden with members Chase, Davies, Galaitsis, Kastorf and planning <br />staff Garber, McCall- Taylor, and Tap present. <br />MINUTES ******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />Review of Minutes The Board reviewed and corrected the minutes for the meeting of December 10, <br />2003. On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the minutes as amended. <br />* * * * * * * * * * ** ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Luom Farm Lane Conventional Subdivision Eu ene Luon o Public Hearing continued from <br />December 10 2003: Present for this item were Mr. and Mrs. Luongo and their children Gregory and <br />Theresa; Mr. Gary Larson and Mr. Chris Bailey, landscape architects, of Larson Associates; Mr. Dylan <br />James and Mr. Brian Timm, engineers, of Meridian Associates; and Mr. William J. Dailey, Jr., attorney <br />for the Luongos. There were 38 people in the audience. <br />Mr. Harden opened the hearing at 7:45 p.m. He noted that the public hearing had been continued from <br />December 10 because the Board felt it needed more information about the conservation restriction on land <br />at the back of lots four and five, assurance about the design intent for all of the houses and adequate sight <br />lines for traffic at the new intersection. <br />Mr. Larson covered five points: <br />1. The design team found it could include a five -foot wide sidewalk with two curb cuts along the <br />front property line on Pleasant Street; they propose none on the new subdivision street. <br />2. They looked at the possibility of narrowing the new street, but believe that the Town would not <br />accept it as a public street, which is Mr. Luongo's goal. <br />3. They investigated the use of a looped water line but discovered that it would require a 20 -foot <br />easement, hence the removal of many trees, Mr. Larson advised that it would be too disruptive to <br />the site plan. <br />4. Concerning the impact of the view of the proposed houses from Pleasant Street, he showed that <br />due to the slight curve of the proposed road, the line of sight to the rear houses would be shielded <br />by trees. He believes that people on Pleasant Street would see only the front two houses. <br />5. The existing retaining wall along Pleasant Street will be altered relative to the new roadway so <br />that traffic sight lines meet all town standards. <br />Mr. Brian Timm, the Project Engineer, reported that the plan complies with all requirements for safe sight <br />distances for traffic at the new intersection. <br />Board Questions and Comments: There were several questions about the traffic sight distances and Mr. <br />Timm's methodology. Mr. Timm explained how he got the data and reiterated that the plan exceeds the <br />minimum distances set by the Lexington Development Regulations and AASHTO's national design <br />standards. <br />The Board still had concerns about the finished grade and height of the houses closest to Pleasant Street, <br />on lots one and seven, and asked the applicant to lower them, even if it meant deleting the basements. Mr. <br />Davies noted that the houses should be made to adapt to the site instead of making the site adapt to the <br />house. The Board also sought assurances that the character of all seven houses would be as presented so <br />far, showing a unity of character. Mr. Larson agreed that unity of character was a goal of the Luongos <br />