Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2010 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town Office <br />Building was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Gregory Zurlo with members Richard Canale, <br />Charles Hornig, Anthony Galaitsis, Wendy Manz and planning staff Maryann McCall-Taylor and Aaron <br />Henry present. <br /> <br />*******************HARTWELL AVENUE TRANSPORTATION PLAN******************* <br />An overview of the transportation study and plan was the presented by Rick Bryant of Tetra Tech Rizzo, <br />the Board’s consultant. Comments from the Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) were <br />received in writing prior to the meeting and responses to these comments were provided at the meeting. <br /> <br />EDAC Questions <br />Will the two-roundabout (2RB) solution be able to handle the projected capacity needs? What will the <br />traffic impact be at a 40, 50 and 60 percent increased capacity? Information from the study was shared <br />that shows that the critical Hartwell/Bedford roundabout will operate better than or equal to other <br />designs under consideration from a volume-to-capacity perspective. The intersection may still experience <br />peak hour traffic demands that are 20 percent more than the roundabout’s capacity under full build out <br />conditions. However, these projected traffic levels may never be realized given capacity constraints on <br />other elements of the area roadway system (Route 128 and Bedford Street east and west of the study <br />area). <br /> <br />Is the proposed one time $3 to $5 per sq-ft district wide traffic improvement assessment (DTIA) on new <br />space, collected at permitting time, to finance town's 25% share of the projected $12 million 2RB cost <br />workable? Information from the study was shared that showed that higher fees are being paid by <br />developers elsewhere in Burlington and in Needham, MA. EDAC representatives expressed concerns that <br />developers will not want to pay fees that do not end up being spent to improve the corridor. It is believed <br />that developers in the Hartwell Avenue area in the past made fee payments which have never been spent <br />on the corridor. <br /> <br />Has an analysis (or an assumption) been done on when it is likely the development will take place? No <br />assumptions have been made in this regard. The mitigation fund and need for traffic improvements are <br /> <br /> <br />