|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2010-03-10-PB-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Planning Board-PB
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
2010-03-10-PB-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2019 3:27:52 PM
Creation date
4/8/2010 12:49:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - PB - Planning Board
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 10, 2010 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was held in the Selectmen’s Meeting Room, Town <br />Office Building, and called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Zurlo with members Canale and Manz, <br />planning staff Henry and McCall-Taylor present. Mr. Hornig and Mr. Galaitsis were absent. <br /> <br />*************************TOWN MEETING WARRANT********************************* <br />Article 43, RD-5 rezoning amendment; Countryside Manor, Woburn Street: Mr. Henry said this is <br />substantively done except for possible tweaks to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Board <br />members indicated that they were inclined to recommend approval but had a few questions about where <br />certain items should go - what goes in the preliminary plan, the covenant or the MOU? Ms. McCall- <br />Taylor said attorneys had worked to get things in the right place and in accordance with the regulations. <br />Mr. Henry said zoning cannot regulate tenure and, rather than risk raising an issue during the Attorney <br />General’s review, the document simply “anticipated” that the restriction would be in the special permit if <br />granted. A Board member asked if there is something in writing from Town Counsel that the Town <br />Meeting vote amending the RD zone would not constitute the 2/3 vote removing the restrictions of the <br />original RD. <br /> <br />Further Board comments included: <br /> <br /> Is affordable housing in the MOU? No, Only traffic mitigation <br /> <br /> Where are the requirements for Rental and 50% affordable from original PSDUP? <br /> <br /> The contribution to tree fund was in draft covenant and not carried over. Monies should be in <br /> <br /> This adds a type of housing that the Town does not have enough of. <br /> <br /> Affordable units are expected to be evenly distributed throughout the building. Mr. Henry said <br />the LIP program will review and may impose requirements. <br /> <br /> Take a look at the use of additional square footage on the fourth floor, and, if allowed, should add <br />one market rate and one affordable unit. <br /> <br /> Trying to figure what is small and what is not; not too long ago 2,500 square feet was considered <br />jumbo. <br /> <br /> What numbers of school aged children are expected and what is the projected increase in taxes? <br />Mr. Addelson is doing a review of the fiscal impact. <br />Motion was made to recommend approval of submission with qualifications. The motion failed for the <br />lack of a second. The Board wanted a chance to review the official document first, but staff needed <br />guidance in order to draft a report. A straw poll was taken indicating that the Board was in favor of the <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.