Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LDAC <br /> <br />EXINGTONESIGNDVISORYOMMITTEE <br /> <br />Meeting Minutes: <br /> <br />February 3, 2010 <br /> <br />Present: <br />Tim Lee (Chair), Richard Friedson, Steve Vincent, Ginna Johnson, Bahig Kaldas, Brigitte Staines, Colin <br />Smith, Bruce Creager, Richard Brown <br /> <br />Scribe: <br /> <br />Tim Lee <br /> <br />Call to Order: <br /> <br />The Meeting was called to Order at 7:30PM. <br /> <br />Approvals: <br />Minutes of the previous meeting were approved with minor corrections. <br /> <br />Presentations/Review: <br />450 Bedford Street, ViewPoint Sign and Awning – Sign Application <br />The DAC reviewed the revised version of the proposed sign application and had the following comments. <br /> <br />1. The DAC would prefer that only one sign be installed on one side of the entry drive instead of <br />two. <br />2. The DAC commented that the sign is still too big. The overall length and height need to be <br />reduced. The height and length should be reduced so the proposed sign is no bigger then the <br />existing sign in height and length. Ideally no more then 36” high. <br />3. The DAC commented that it is a very big lettering on a sign for simply a street address and <br />would like to see the numbering and lettering size reduced significantly from the proposed 17-1/2” <br />and 10” height. <br /> <br />The Design Advisory Committee recommended the applicant return for further review after they have <br />made the suggested changes. <br /> <br />33 Hayden Avenue, Wireless Facility – Special Permit Application <br />The DAC reviewed the proposed wireless facility application and had the following comments. <br /> <br />1. The DAC commented that they would prefer to see the antenna enclosures match the material type, <br />(metal) and color (black) of the buildings existing mechanical enclosure and the wireless canister <br />located in the same vicinity. <br />2. The DAC felt that too many different materials on the roof would make it visually cluttered and <br />draw too much attention to the roof. <br />3. No sample of the ‘faux’ brick panels proposed was provided for DAC review. <br /> <br />The Design Advisory Committee recommended approval with the suggested changes noted above. <br /> <br />330 & 334 Woburn Street & 421 Lowell Street, Lexington, MA – Proposed Bank for TD Bank <br />The DAC reviewed the revised version of the proposed bank facility and site development and had the <br />following comments. <br /> <br />1. Even though the applicant moved the building twenty feet closer to Lowell Street the DAC still <br />feels there is too much parking and paving in general for this site and building function. <br /> <br />