Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LDAC <br /> <br />EXINGTONESIGNDVISORYOMMITTEE <br /> <br />Meeting Minutes: <br />October 7, 2009 <br /> <br />REVISED November 30, 2009 <br /> <br />Present: <br />Tim Lee (Chair), John Frey, Richard Friedson, Steve Vincent, Colin Smith, Ginna Johnson, Betsy <br />Whitman, Alenka Slezak, Richard Brown, Bahig Kaldas <br /> <br />Scribe: <br /> <br />Tim Lee <br /> <br />Call to Order: <br /> <br />The Meeting was called to Order at 7:30PM. <br /> <br />Approvals: <br />None <br /> <br />Presentations/Review: <br />Tourism Committee, bicycle signs for Lexington center <br />The DAC reviewed the proposed bicycle signs to direct riders to walk their bikes on the sidewalks in <br />Lexington center. The signs have already been approved by the Historic District Commission (HDC). The <br />signs will be mounted on a specified number of trash cans in the center. The white background with <br />maroon letters was selected for visibility and compatibility with the existing tourism signs in the center. <br />The code text on the sign must remain per Lexington Police department. Understanding the site conditions <br />and project restrictions the DAC generally approved the proposed sign with the following comments. <br />1. The DAC suggested adding the word ‘Please’ to the sign. <br />2. The DAC suggested changing the background color to a gray tone instead of white. <br />3. The DAC suggested making the signs smaller. <br />4. The DAC suggested eliminating the ‘dingbat’ detail at each end of the sign. <br />5. The DAC suggested adding signs at the town bike racks. <br />6. The DAC asked that the applicant return with revised mock-ups for review(added 11/30/09) <br /> <br />450 Bedford St., Lexington, MA - Sign Application <br />The DAC reviewed the proposed signs and had the following comments. <br />1. The DAC is concerned that the signs are too big for the proposed location and should be scaled <br />down and would like the sign not to exceed 5’-0” in height and be no longer then the existing signs <br />in length. <br />2. The DAC wanted the sign of the lettering to be reduce in proportion with the sign <br />3. The DAC commented that typically internally lit signs are not acceptable and that the applicant <br />should pursue lighting the signs externally. <br />4. The DAC asked if the applicant could try and limit the number of signs to one. <br />5. The DAC reminded the applicant to maintain safe visibility. <br />The DAC recommended that the applicant return for further review once the sign has been redesigned. <br /> <br />240 Bedford St., Lexington, MA – Sign Application <br />Understanding the site conditions and project restrictions the DAC generally approved the proposed sign <br />with the following comments. <br />1. The DAC suggested adding additional text to direct traffic and reduce the size of the arrow. <br />2. The DAC reminded the applicant to maintain safe visibility. <br /> <br />Lexington Technology Park – Request for Amendment to PSDUP <br /> <br />