Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 2010 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board was held in Estabrook Hall, Cary Memorial Building, <br />and called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Zurlo with members Canale, Galaitsis, Hornig, Manz, and <br />planning staff McCall-Taylor, Henry and Kaufman present. <br />******************************ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS*************************** <br />Mr. Canale recused himself from consideration of the Lexington Technology Park application since he <br />was an abutter to an abutter for the tract as a whole. <br /> <br />200 Patriot Drive Lexington Technology Park, Special Permit: Robert Buckley and Ethan Solomon of <br />Reimer and Braunstein, Peter Corbett of Goulston and Storrs, John Hart and Brian Lawlor of SMMA <br />were present. Mr. Buckley said that they would be submitting a Definitive Site Development and Use <br />Plan (DSDUP) within the next few weeks, but wanted to start a dialogue. They have decided to file the <br />Special permit with Site Plan Review with the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in advance of the DSDUP <br />even though it cannot be acted upon by the Board until they file the DSDUP. <br /> <br />Mr. Hart gave a brief overview of the proposal to update the Planning Board on the DSDUP that will be <br />submitted to the ZBA and govern the entire CD-10 campus. <br /> <br />Board Comments: <br /> <br /> Was there any direct line of sight from the residents on Shade Street? Will any lights be emitted <br />from the building? There will be automatic shades on the windows. <br /> <br /> Was a noise study done? Will the Noise Advisory Committee review the report? Yes it was in the <br />booklet. <br /> <br /> What does 64% transmission of light generated from building mean? Will get back on that. Will <br />there be additional buffering and further landscaping done to buffer Shade Street? Yes, additional <br />landscape will be provided. Like the design but seems incompatible with Building 100; how will <br />it fit? Will you need all the parking approved in the plan, which had 300 surface parking spaces? <br />It will be shown in the DSDUP. <br /> <br /> Would like to see all the buildings, are the shades tied to the building systems? Yes the shades <br />have to go down by 8:00 pm. <br /> <br /> There was a meeting with DAC, were there any comments? Yes, they like it and are meeting <br />again with them. <br /> <br /> The 64% was probably thermal not transmission. Want comments on all metallic finishes next <br /> <br />