Laserfiche WebLink
`o JS Mop? <br />oQ 177 hQ <br />a -> <br />=w r <br />a <br />s �P <br />APRILI9 <br />�FXI NG"s <br />Frederick DeAngelis, Chairman <br />Richard Thuma, Vice Chairman <br />Wendy Rudner <br />Sandra Shaw <br />Howard Vogel <br />RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br />December 16, 2009 <br />Town of Lexington <br />Recreation Committee <br />Town Office Building Room 207 <br />Tel: (781) 862 - 0500 x262 <br />Fax: (781) 861 -2747 <br />Members Present: Rick DeAngelis (Chairman), Wendy Rudner, Sandra Shaw, Howard Vogel, and Dick <br />Thuma (Vice Chairman) <br />Staff Present: Karen Simmons, Peter Coleman and Sheila Butts <br />The meeting of the Recreation Committee came to order at 7:04 PM. The following items were topics of <br />discussion: <br />1. Citizens and Other Boards: <br />No citizens or other boards were present. <br />2. Meeting Minutes from November 17,2009: <br />Rick DeAngelis made, and Sandra Shaw seconded a motion to approve the Meeting Minutes of <br />November 17, 2009, as written. There was no discussion. The motion was approved (4 — 0 - 1). <br />Dick Thuma, who was absent from the November meeting, expressed his concern and displeasure <br />that the Recreation Committee had revisited, reconsidered and voted to resubmit Park <br />Improvement /Athletic Field Capital Article requesting $50,000 to address the athletic field at the <br />Hastings School in FY2011. Mr. Thuma voiced his opinion that the Committee reconsidered the <br />Article without any new information provided at the November meeting or indicated in the minutes of <br />said meeting. Mr. DeAngelis and Ms. Shaw both indicated that additional information regarding the <br />Article was provided at the November meeting, and is noted in the November meeting minutes. <br />3. Center Field Drainage: <br />A full discussion of the Center Field Drainage is postponed until the January meeting at which time <br />representatives from Stantec will be in attendance to address any concerns and answer any questions <br />the Recreation Committee might have. <br />Members of the Recreation Committee did have a lively discussion of the proposed project, and <br />posed questions about the costs, ADA compliance and the manner in which non - budgeted items were <br />listed in the Stantec proposal. Mr. Thuma asked where in the budget the money for the camera <br />investigation of the existing drainage lines would be shown. He also inquired as to what money was <br />budgeted for bringing the fields into ADA compliance? He indicated that both would certainly affect <br />the budget for the project. Ms. Simmons explained that the Stantec report lists both CPC and non - <br />CPC items, but a close review will show that there is no dollar amount listed for the non -CPC items, <br />as they would be a separate Capital Article request. Mr. Thuma suggested that the Department ask <br />1625 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE • LEXINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02420 <br />