Laserfiche WebLink
E , <br />Minutes for the Meeting of November 22, 1993 <br />101 <br />10mb sponded that if the Board decides to keep the position within Civil <br />i <br />Service, it would be the Town Manager's decision to keep the position <br />promotional, from within the ranks. <br />More discussion followed on the procedure of the appointment of a <br />new chief. Questions were asked on the role of the assessment center <br />in the process. Mr. White reported that the assessment center would <br />have to be approved and sanctioned by civil Service, and he would use <br />a panel of experts to give feedback. He indicated that whether or not <br />the position remains in Civil Service, the recruitment process would <br />include assessment center. Questions and comments from the Board <br />included whether the assessment center would be entirely subjective as <br />opposed to a written test. Mr. white indicated the assessment center <br />includes measurable oral and /or written exercises and responses which <br />can be graded. An issue for Board is what procedures are used in <br />recruiting the next Chief. In one case, the Town would be required to <br />conform to Civil Service standards. In the other, the Town would use <br />sound recruiting processes that are used in any critical recruitment <br />like a Police Chief. <br />Questions to Mr. White about the function of the panel of ex- <br />perts. Mr. white responded that they would be used as an assessment <br />tool, grading and evaluating candidates, and would be appointed by him <br />in consultation with the consultants and the Division of Personnel <br />Administration if the position remains in Civil Service. If the <br />position is taken out of Civil Service, it will require action by Town <br />Meeting to amend the Town Manager Act and action by the Great and <br />General Court. When the Board decides on the Civil Service issue, Mr. <br />White will come back to the Board with specifics about the assessment <br />center. <br />Question ensued about taking the appointment out of Civil Ser- <br />vice, which would mean not being bound by veterans' preference; the <br />Town can have control of tenure; and through a contract, protect the <br />independence of Police Chief, separating politics from administration; <br />and can set own minimum standards which would exceed Civil Service <br />standards. Mr. White noted that right now minimum standards include <br />no educational requirements and five years of administration for <br />supervisory experience is the minimum qualification. <br />Much discussion ensued on the advantages and disadvantages of <br />Civil Service: the advantage of flexibility for the Town to set its <br />own criteria outside Civil Service; political interference not being <br />an issue for Lexington in the recent past; protecting the chief from <br />political interference; and recognizing the chief must be accountable <br />to the Town. Mr. white reminded the Board of the Ad Hoc Committee's <br />problem with Civil Service protection which was described as lifetime <br />tenure; and that the model contract the committee developed included <br />criteria for continuing employment with a renewal process; the chief <br />would be protected yet the Town would have accountability. Reference <br />was made to the recommendation of the committee that Town Manager Act <br />needs to be amended by Town Meeting to allow vote of majority of Board <br />to remove a chief from office and also requires additional legislation <br />on the state level. Mrs. Eddison summarized that the direction <br />that the report is leading the Board in is the way the Town should go <br />unless there is a major rewriting of the Civil Service requirements by <br />the State. She asked that the Board revisit the report of the Commit- <br />tee in a year so that the Board can examine the question of withdrawal <br />from the Civil Service at a time when the Town is not filling a <br />