Laserfiche WebLink
IPA <br />vow <br />AB Hoc OVERRIDE GROUP <br />Peter Enright, speaking for the Ad Hoc override Group stated that the <br />most important issue facing the Town this year will be to deceive whether to <br />keep the services which makes Lexington the Town it is. Mr. Enright's Group <br />is reluctant to see any of the school or Town services cut and saw an override <br />of Proposition 2 1/2 as the only way to preserve them. <br />He outlined the provisions under Proposition 2 1/2 which allows for <br />overrides and felt that the Townspeople would support such a movement. He <br />said that the Ad Hoc override Group would work hard to ensure the success of <br />an override, if the Selectmen vote to allow the question to come before the <br />voters. <br />Mr. Enright expressed the hope of his group that the Selectmen would <br />continue to work with the School committee toward consensus on budget matters <br />and promised to provide support if an override is placed on the ballot. <br />Jacqueline Weinstock, League of Women Voters, also asked that the voters <br />be given the opportunity to decide on override. <br />Fred Rosenberg, TMMA Executive Committee, encouraged the Board to come <br />to decisions on its positions on financial issues quickly so as to clari fy <br />procedures as much as possible for Town Meeting Members. <br />Judy Alexander and Bea McDonald, Realtors, referred to the services and <br />q uality it y of life offered in Lexington as reasons for sales of homes and urged <br />that an override be implemented to allow continuance of those services. <br />Elaine Engelberg, High School Teacher, noted the long range effects of low <br />the excellence of the school system on the lives of students and was in favor <br />of letting voters decide on an override. <br />Cindy Blumsack, President of Lexington citizens for Quality Education, <br />offered the services of her group not as advocates but as resource persons on <br />the override issue. <br />Roland Greeley read a statement in which he urged the Board to assume <br />leadership on the override matters and allow voters to decide on which route <br />they wished to follows. <br />Richard Schaye noted the pride of residents in the uniqueness of the <br />Town and advocated a modest override to keep it, despite the critical <br />financial situation. <br />Mr. Marshall said he felt that the Board is moving in the right <br />direction. He added that if an override is put before the voters, a great <br />deal of help would be needed from supporters if it was to pass. <br />Jacqueline Ward said she has been getting calls from many citizens with <br />limited incomes, expressing their fears that they may not be able to continue <br />to live in Lexington if an override is passed. <br />Mary Shunney suggested that the Selectmen be objective about the impact <br />of working within available funds and to take into consideration the effect of <br />override costs on low income residents. She noted the special interests of <br />those who had spoken in favor of an override. <br />Mr. Eddison thanked those in attendance for sharing their views on the _ <br />override issue. He referred to the successful meeting on March 3rd with the <br />School and Finance Committees and hoped that the spirit of cooperation evident <br />at that time would be continued. '� <br />