Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />Poft <br />SELECTMEN'S MEETING <br />December 11, 1980 <br />: <br />1 <br />r <br />�. <br />9 <br />A regular meeting of the Board of Selectmen was held on Monday, <br />December 11, 1989, in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town office Building, at <br />1:30 p.m. Acting Chairman Eddison, Mr. Dailey, Mr. McSweeney; Mr. Cohen, Town <br />Counsel; Ms. Radway, Asst. to the Town Manager; Mrs. Snow, Executive Clerk, <br />were present. Mr. Marshall and Mr. White arrived later in the meeting, <br />explained the need for <br />in opposition, the <br />to approve the <br />for the purpose of <br />Marrett Road -- southerly approximately 137 feet southeast of Waltham <br />Street, a distance of about ten feet. <br />with Waltham Street. <br />Edward Chisholm, representing the Edison Company, <br />the work to provide service to the new Mobil Station, <br />There being no questions or comments in favor or <br />Chairman declared the hearing closed. <br />Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was voted <br />petition, plans and orders of the Boston Edison Company <br />installing ten feet of conduit in the following area: <br />PUBLIC HEARING EDISON MARRETT ROAD <br />Mr. Eddison opened a public hearing on the petition of Boston Edison <br />Company for permission to install conduit in Marrett Road at its intersection <br />NUCLEAR WEAPONS FREEZE COMMITTEE <br />Lester Arond and other members of the Lexington Committee for a Nuclear <br />Weapons Freeze, met with the Board to request approval of their request for <br />insertion in the 1990 Annual Town Meeting ballot of a question proposing cuts <br />in military spending by the federal government in order to reduce the deficit <br />and fund economic, environmental and social needs. <br />Mr. Arond pointed out the interconnecting of state and federal budgets <br />adverse impact on local budgets and read the proposed question for the ballot. <br />Carolyn Tiffany reported on a State committee for a nuclear freeze which <br />is sponsoring a campaign to allow citizens to have a voice in the allocation <br />of state and federal funds. <br />Mr. Eddison said he was supportive of the stated objectives but was <br />troubled by having a question on the local ballot, the subject of which is not <br />directly connected with the running of the Town and by the precedent which <br />would be created regarding other questions, as they are submitted for <br />insertion on the ballot. He added that if he thought the inclusion of the <br />question would increase voter participation, he would be more inclined to <br />favor the request. <br />POW Mr. Dailey noted that the Board historically has not endorsed the <br />addition of questions on the ballot because of the precedent which would be <br />formed and that he.would not support the request. <br />Mr. McSweeney agreed, on the basis of precedent. <br />Mr. Cohen explained procedures under statute which must be followed <br />which require ten signatures on such a petition to the Selectmen. If the <br />Selectmen do not approve, the petitioners have 90 days in which to obtain the <br />signatures of 10% of the registered voters (1,800 signatures). <br />Motion was made to approve the insertion in the 1990 ballot as pr oposed <br />by the Lexington Committee for a Nuclear Freeze, and seconded for ur <br />p poses of <br />,a votel. <br />