Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Preservation Committee <br />Monday, November 13, 2008 <br />Legion Room <br />4:00 pm <br /> <br /> <br />Present: <br />Betsey Weiss, Chair; Marilyn Fenollosa, Vice Chair; Joel Adler, Norman <br />Cohen, Jeanne Krieger, Wendy Manz, Leo McSweeney, Nathalie Rice, Admin. Asst.; <br />Sandy Shaw and Dick Wolk. David Kanter, CEC liaison was also present. <br /> <br />Absent: <br />Wendy Manz <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 4:06 pm. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the eligibility of the projects under <br />consideration by the Committee with Town Counsel, Kevin Batt. These included the two <br />articles to be brought to Special Town Meeting (FY2009), and the fourteen projects being <br />considered for Annual Town Meeting (FY2010). <br /> <br />1. Special Town Meeting Articles, FY 2009 <br /> <br />Mr. Batt explained that the purchase of the Goodwin parcels was clearly an eligible <br />project under the CPA. The Harrington Playground, he noted was also eligible, since it <br />was a new playground. He also pointed out that it had previously been approved at the <br />2008 Annual Town Meeting. <br /> <br />2. Annual Town Meeting Projects, FY 2010 <br /> <br /> <br />a.Town Office Renovations <br />– Mr. Batt noted that the Town Office <br />building is in the historic district and that much of the work was eligible <br />for funding. Ms. Fenollosa added that the building is in the Registry of <br />historic places (?), but questioned whether the Committee could fund <br />aspects of the proposed project such as “realignment of staff”. Mr. Batt <br />replied that this was a very gray area that might fall under the broad <br />term of “remodeling”, and said that the Committee could look at the <br />design documents and select the work that seemed to qualify most <br />clearly for CPA funds. Mr. Kanter noted that the design document is in <br />the process of completion. <br /> <br /> <br />b.Fire Headquarters <br /> - This project is to “research and study the use of <br />the building”. Mr. Batt noted that renovations to the building qualify <br />under the CPA, but that any additions would not. The Committee <br />pointed out that since there is no cost estimate associated with the <br />request, it is difficult for them to properly review the project. Mr. <br />Kanter updated the Committee on the progress of project, noting that <br />st <br />estimates which were due November 1, are expected to come in mid <br /> 1 <br /> <br />