|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2009-01-15-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2006-2009
>
2009
>
2009-01-15-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:18:00 AM
Creation date
10/19/2009 5:57:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Community Preservation Committee <br />Thursday, January 15, 2009 <br />Legion Room <br />4:00 pm <br /> <br />Present: <br />Betsey Weiss, Chair; Marilyn Fenollosa, Vice Chair; Joel Adler, Norman <br />Cohen, Jeanne Krieger, Wendy Manz, Leo McSweeney, Nathalie Rice, Admin. Asst.; <br />Sandy Shaw and Dick Wolk. Mr. David Kanter of the CEC was also present. <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 4:05 pm. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to take final votes on all thirteen projects which were <br />under consideration for funding by the CPC. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1.Historic Structures Update <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Fenollosa reported that she had attended a Capital Expenditures Committee <br />meeting in which the Committee discussed its priorities. She said the Stone Building <br />has long been on their list, and there was also a great deal of interest in the white <br />building on Massachusetts Avenue owned by the Archdiocese. She reported that the <br />CEC said it would look favorably upon its restoration if it came before the CPC at <br />some point in the future. Mr. Wolk asked how the Historical Commission decides <br />upon a structure, and specifically how it judges whether a structure is worth restoring. <br /> <br />Ms. Fenollosa responded that the Historic District Commission, (for which she is the <br />representative), has no regulatory authority. It is the Historic Commission which <br />would impose a one year demolition delay, if needed, to assess the structural integrity <br />of a structure. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2.Votes on Projects <br /> <br /> <br />The Committee took preliminary votes on several projects as noted below: <br /> <br />(a) Center Fields Project (9-0) <br />(b) Storm Water Mitigation at the Old Res. (9-0) <br /> <br />(c)Pine Meadows (9-0) <br /> <br />(d)Archives and Records (9-0) <br /> <br />(e)Cary Vault (9-0) <br /> <br />(f)Town Offices Building Renovations (7-2) (Ms. Manz and Ms. Fenollosa <br />dissenting) <br /> <br />(g)Police Station (6-3) (Ms. Manz, Ms. Fenollosa and Mr. Wolk dissenting) <br /> <br />(h)Stone Building (no vote taken) <br /> <br />(i)Fire Headquarters (7-2) (Ms. Manz and Ms. Fenollosa dissenting) <br /> <br />(j)Greeley Village Roof Replacement (9-0) <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.