|
Lexington Home Page
|
Help
|
About
|
Browse
Search
2009-01-12-CPC-min
Breadcrumb Navigation:
TownOfLexington-Public
>
WEB PUBLISHED-PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
>
MINUTES-REPORTS-COMMITTEES ARCHIVE
>
Community Preservation Committee-CPC
>
Minutes
>
2006-2009
>
2009
>
2009-01-12-CPC-min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 11:18:00 AM
Creation date
10/19/2009 5:56:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Archives
Keywords or Subject
Minutes - CPC - Community Preservation Committee
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Community Preservation Committee <br />Monday, January 12, 2009 <br />Legion Room <br />4:30 pm <br /> <br />Present: <br />Betsey Weiss, Chair; Marilyn Fenollosa, Vice Chair; Joel Adler, Norman <br />Cohen, Wendy Manz, Nathalie Rice, Admin. Asst.; Sandy Shaw and Dick Wolk. <br /> <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 4:35 pm. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to review two projects before the CPC for funding in <br />FY 2010. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1.Town Office Building Renovation Project – <br />Linda Vine and Pat Goddard were <br />in attendance to discuss the Town Offices Renovation Project. Mr. Goddard <br />opened the discussion by explaining that the Town Manager’s Office has <br />reconsidered the scope of the Town Offices Renovation project in order to more <br />fully explore the needs of the Town Office Departments. He said that the original <br />request to the CPC for 1.2M was predicated on a design cost of 80,000, and a <br />subsequent “fast track” renovation. After considering the project, it became clear <br />that the 1.2M estimated cost might not suffice for the types of renovations needed. <br />Mr. Goddard and Ms. Vine explained that the construction estimate did not <br />include any changes to interior walls, and did not take into consideration the co- <br />location of departments with similar public functions, such as those in <br />Community Development. They said they realized the process had been <br />accelerated at an unrealistic pace, and needed to be slowed in order to more <br />carefully design a more inclusive scope of work. <br /> <br />With that in mind, the Town Managers’ Office would be resubmitting a request <br />for less funding from the CPC, in all likelihood, $30,000. This would enable the <br />Town’s office design team to consider the project over the next year, work with <br />the design consultant, and determine the most essential upgrades. The team would <br />then go to the various committee involved, and decide upon the best plan with <br />which to move forward. The request to the CPC for construction monies would <br />follow for FY 2011. <br /> <br />Ms. Fenollosa questioned Mr. Goddard and Ms. Vine about whether they would <br />pursue the Town Office renovations without CPC funding. They responded that <br />they felt the upgrades to Town Offices were needed, particularly in the areas of <br />ADA upgrades and fire safety. Ms. Vine explained that there is now no ADA <br />bathroom on the second floor to serve Selectmen’s Meeting Room, and Mr. <br />Goddard added that the interior stairwells are not up to code from a fire safety <br />standpoint. Ms. Weiss asked how the Town Office renovation project “stacked <br />up” to the project before the CPC for upgrades to the Fire Headquarters. Mr. <br /> 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.