Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MAY 4, 2005 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Room G-1, Town Office Building, was called <br />to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairman Harden with members Manz, Hornig, Canale and planning staff <br />McCall-Taylor present. Mr. Galaitsis was absent. <br /> <br />***************************** VISION 2020 COMMITTEE ****************************** <br />Update from the Vision 2020 Committee: Ms. Candy McLaughlin and Ms. Stacey Hamilton reported on <br />recent activities of the Vision 2020 Committee. Lexington 2020 Vision is a town-wide effort to use <br />"20/20 vision" and empower residents to help determine what Lexington will be like in the year 2020. <br />The Lexington 2020 Vision Committee coordinates the process. The three Task Forces formed last fall <br />have completed their work of analyzing the issues and recommending actions related to several of the <br />community's long-term priority goals. Final reports of the task forces on Forging Constructive <br />Community Discourse and Strengthening Lexington’s Budget Process and Communications are now <br />available. The Fostering Economic Development task force identified some key issues but did not agree <br />to propose any concrete actions at this time. <br />Mr. Canale said that the economic development group has the most direct impact on the Planning Board <br />and its responsibilities and that he had participated in some of their meetings. However, although the <br />chair came up with things that were to be solutions, there seemed to be no high level commitment to the <br />process. As a result there was no real incentive to put a lot of work into it. A coalition is needed to get real <br />work done, and authority and direction are needed, with the Selectmen and Planning Board taking more <br />responsibility. <br />Ms. Hamilton said that the task force would reconvene again in six months to see where they are and to <br />keep going forward. Mr. Canale asked who was the Planning Board delegate, and Mr. Harden responded <br />that he had gone to the October kick-off and then the economic development meetings through November <br />but that the group seemed to be covering the same ground as the Center Committee. Ms. Hamilton said <br />that 2020 is not looking at five years out but at the long range of twenty years. <br />Board members then got into a discussion of the Center Committee, commercial development in general <br />and how it might all fit together. <br />Mr. Canale asked what the 2020 group wanted from the Planning Board. Ms. Hamilton said they were <br />hoping to provide training for chairs and committees on public discourse. Mr. Hornig said he felt the <br />Planning Board meetings were often contentious but in different ways than at School Committee and <br />Board of Selectmen meetings. He wondered if communication were a problem or was it just that people <br />were not interested in the Planning Board. Mr. Canale said decisions by the Planning Board affect the <br />Town as a whole and for the long term, yet people are only interested when it affects them. He felt that <br />the public access channels would make information more available. <br />Mr. Harden said that the Board spends a lot of meeting time on neighborhood development issues and <br />that doesn’t seem to be slowing down. As chair he is still learning the way but tries to think how <br />neighbors feel. He thought it might be helpful to have a knowledgeable person sitting and giving some <br />feedback but there was no appeal in having a general meeting on diverse issues. <br /> <br />Ms. Hamilton asked if it would be helpful to have a joint board meeting. Members felt that given other <br />issues they were contending with, the 2020 process might not be the most pressing issue. They urged the <br />group to reach out to new people for membership. <br /> <br /> <br />