Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 200 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Estabrook Hall, Cary Hall, was called to order <br />at 7:40 p.m. by Chairman Kastorf with members Davies, Galaitsis, Harden, Manz and planning staff <br />McCall-Taylor and Tap present. <br /> <br />The Board acknowledged Ms. McCall-Taylor appointment as Planning Director and expressed their <br />pleasure that she was chosen. The support of Acting Town Manager Linda Crew Vine and Kerry Evans in <br />the Manager's office throughout the recruitment process was also acknowledged. <br /> <br />************************************* MINUTES ************************************** <br />Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed and corrected the minutes for the meeting of December 15, <br />2004. On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the minutes as amended. <br /> <br />There was some discussion relative to using the term 'attainable' to describe affordable and moderate- <br />priced housing in the minutes just approved, and in discussions around Lexington's housing needs. The <br />Board asked staff to put the subject on a future agenda for further discussion. <br /> <br />Review of Minutes: The Board reviewed the minutes for the Executive Session of December 15, 2004. <br />On a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to approve the minutes as written. <br /> <br />************************ ARTICLES FOR 2005 TOWN MEETING ************************ <br />Article 4, Battle Green Inn Rezoning, Eric Shapiro: The development team for the proposed rezoning of <br />the Battle Green Inn property were present, as follows: Mr. Eric Shapiro, owner of the Inn; Mr. John <br />Farrington, attorney; Mr. Arthur Klipfel and Ms. Gwen Noyes, of Oaktree Development; and Mr. Erik <br />Rhodin, Architect, of the Line Company. They came to show the Board some updates to the plans that <br />they submitted on December 28 when the Town Meeting Warrant closed. <br /> <br />Mr. Shapiro listed the changes to the plans: reformatted elevation drawings for more clarity; Vinebrook <br />Road was added to the traffic study factors; the potential number of school-age children in the proposed <br />development is 14, using AvalonBay Communities, Inc.'s methodology; they will reduce the amount of <br />retail space from the current 6,500 square feet in order to allow more parking spaces for residents of the <br />condominiums, and the square footage to be used for a library/reading room for the residents; the <br />building's size was reduced and the structure moved back from the property lines; the range of unit sizes <br />was widened and the fourth floor set back so it is not visible from the street. The project remains revenue <br />neutral to the town. <br /> <br />He expressed the team's commitment to the Center Committee's program to improve connectivity in the <br />central business district. He asked for timely feedback from the Board on the issue of affordable units. As <br />the traffic consultant was not able to attend tonight, Mr. Shapiro read a summary of his traffic study. He <br />also reported that the Historical Commission expressed no desire to save the Inn building. <br /> <br />Board Comments and Questions <br />: <br />Financial Impact Report: Mr. Kastorf said that they used AvalonBay's methodology, which is familiar to <br />Town Meeting, so no one would argue over the methodology . The Board wants to see a chart with the <br />information in tabular form. Mr. Shapiro agreed to email a chart to the Board. When asked, he responded <br />that whichever methodology was used, it still shows a positive tax revenue. Mr. Galaitsis asked if this <br />was a net gain and Mr. Shapiro said yes. <br />Potential Redevelopment of Abutting Properties: Mr. Galaitsis expressed his concern about the potential <br />redevelopment of abutting properties, particularly zero-lot line zoning in the center and fire safety issues. <br />He indicated that he could not support the proposal in its present form. Mr. Farrington pointed out that <br />Cohoes would not be facing a CB district property and could not build to its lot line. Mrs. Manz <br /> <br />