Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2006 <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in Estabrook Hall was called to order at 7:40 <br />p.m. by Chairman Manz, with members Hornig, Harden and planning staff Schilt and Tap present. Mr. <br />Galaitsis and Mr. Canale were absent. <br /> <br />****************** PLANNING BOARD ORGANIZATION, SCHEDULE ******************* <br />COMMITTEE LIAISONS <br />Lighting Options Committee: Mr. Hornig reported that the Lighting Options Committee was absorbed <br />into the Energy Options Committee. The Board agreed that it would like to receive the minutes of that <br />group's meetings to stay informed. <br />Senior Center Siting Committee: Mr. Hornig reported that the Senior Center Action Plan Committee is <br />scheduled to report on its findings to the Selectmen on February 6. The recommended site will be the <br />Monroe School Building. <br />Center Committee: Ms. Manz reported that she attended a meeting about a feasibility study for a senior <br />center and parking structure, either at the Depot Square lot or the lot behind stores on the south side of <br />Massachusetts Avenue. <br />Community Preservation Act (CPA) Committee: Ms. Manz reported that the CPA Committee asked for a <br />letter of support from the Planning Board for the upcoming ballot question about the town accepting the <br />CPA. The Board agreed to send a letter of support. <br /> <br />************************************* MINUTES ************************************** <br />Review of Minutes: Ms. Manz asked for more detail in the minutes of the November 16, 2006 executive <br />session. The Board agreed to review more detailed minutes at a future meeting. <br /> <br />************ ADMINISTRATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ************* <br />SUBDIVISION OF LAND <br />Public Information Meeting, Lexington Hills Conventional Subdivision Revised Preliminary Plan (off <br />Walnut Street, part of the former Middlesex County Hospital site): Present for the development team <br />were Mr. Joseph Lerman and Mr. Habib Aminipour, August Realty Trust, applicants; Mr. Gary Larson <br />and Mr. Ti Johnson, landscape architects, Larson Associates; and Mr. Edmund Grant, attorney. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson presented a plan that he indicated responds to the Board's comments on the previous <br />preliminary plan, reviewed on January 4, 2006, as follows: the context map includes the development <br />across the Town line in Waltham; the amount of impervious surface is less, due to smaller house <br />footprints and two-car garages instead of three; and, the communications tower is on a separate lot of a <br />size to satisfy safety concerns, 90 feet from the Town line with a planted buffer. The plan is now for 18 <br />lots, as one lot was lost in order to accommodate the size of the lot for the communications tower. Mr. <br />Larson said that he measured the sight distances at the intersections of proposed roadway with Walnut <br />Street, and in both directions on Walnut Street he found they exceed AASHTO parameters of 200 feet. <br />The sewer will connect into the town system in Walnut Street via gravity feed to a pump station. He noted <br />that all utilities are in Walnut Street. <br /> <br />Changes in the stormwater management system allow the drainage system to handle all runoff on the <br />property even though the designers have reduced the size of the system's underground structures. The <br />dwellings will each have dry wells for roof runoff, which allowed the reduction in the size of the <br />infiltration system. Erosion control measures will be applied to all slopes over 3 percent. Mr. Larson <br />explained why creating a vehicle easement to Lot 1 is impractical, citing in particular the 40-foot grade <br />change which would make construction of any roads financially infeasible, It could result in the loss of up <br />to two lots in the Lexington Hills subdivision. There would be significant site disturbance to <br />accommodate a 12 percent grade for the road. In addition, the presence of a vernal pool on Lot 1 would <br />prohibit permitting of the road. <br /> <br />