Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 2006 <br /> <br />A regular meeting of the Lexington Planning Board held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Office <br />Building, was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Manz with members Galaitsis, Hornig, Canale, <br />Harden and planning staff McCall-Taylor, Schilt and Tap present. <br /> <br />************************ ARTICLES FOR 2006 TOWN MEETING ************************ <br />Article 7, CD-7 to CD-13, 727 Marrett Road, Starwood Hotels and Resorts, Public Information Meeting: <br />Present for the public information meeting on the property owner's rezoning proposal for the Sheraton <br />Hotel site were Mr. John Farrington, attorney; Mr. Robert Weidknecht, engineer, Beals and Thomas; Mr. <br />Scott Thrun, senior project manager, Starwood; Mr. Alex Campbell, architect, Fruchtman Associates; Mr. <br />John Fotiadis, architect, Costas Kondylis and Partners; and Mr. William Bunce, General Manager of the <br />Sheraton. <br /> <br />Mr. Thrun outlined Starwood's program for the property and Mr. Bunce described the realities of the hotel <br />industry and the current building's failure to perform in an evolving market. The hotel and its systems are <br />outdated; the multiple entries are a security issue and there are Americans with Disabilities Act <br />compliance issues. Mr. Weidknecht presented an aerial overview of the site, an analysis of its viewsheds, <br />and described in general the site work that would be needed for the two hotel buildings, pointing out that <br />the plan calls for less disturbance of the knoll than the renovation/addition plans approved in 1989. <br /> <br />Mr. Farrington said that the Transportation Demand Management measures proposed by Flatley as part of <br />the 1989 rezoning have been instituted, with the $150,000 payment the only significant outstanding item. <br />Mr. Canale said that there was also an obligation to set up a transportation management program as well <br />as an annual reporting requirement. <br /> <br />Mr. Campbell showed plans for the aloft hotel reflecting changes made in response to the Board's <br />previous comments. The sign on top and its up-lighting were removed, and surface treatments changed. <br />Mr. Fotiadis presented the Extended Stay by Westin hotel plans, which show different exterior cladding <br />from the previous iteration. Both buildings have four stories. <br /> <br />Board Comments and Questions: <br />Mr. Harden said that the two hotel buildings should relate to each other, even though each has its own <br />brand identity, perhaps in a more campus-like setting. The presentation should show both buildings on <br />the site sections and elevations rather than presenting each building individually. He also suggested <br />providing a cross-section through the aloft building to show how it relates to the knoll. He found it hard to <br />see how these designs fit the site. <br /> <br />Mr. Galaitsis concurred about the need to see sections showing the current and proposed grades and <br />elevations. He did not feel that the buildings fit into a colonial environment. He asked that the <br />presentation be accurate and realistic. He pointed out inconsistencies, such as Starwood's statement that <br />the development was not visible from Fiske Hill and Route 128, as compared to another statement that the <br />in-ground pool was a beacon. <br /> <br />Mr. Hornig discussed the setbacks and the FAR. He felt that the current proposal should be compared to <br />the standards of the CRO district as well as those of the CD-7. He said the developer would have to <br />justify the fourth floor. Mr. Farrington replied that the fourth floor gives a smaller footprint and that two <br />buildings can be better set on the site than could one large hotel. The fourth floor allows more rooms, <br />which makes the economics work. Mr. Thrun added that public space is a fixed cost which is amortized <br />over the number of rooms. Mr. Campbell said that there would be substantially more tax revenues with <br />this proposal than if the 1989 plan were built. <br /> <br />