Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF APRIL 5, 2021 <br /> <br />Minutes of the Lexington Planning Board <br />th <br />Held on April 5, 2021, Virtual Meeting per Governor Baker’s Order at 5:03 pm <br />Present: Charles Hornig, Chair; Robert Peters, Vice-Chair; Clerk; Melanie Thompson; and <br />Robert Creech. Also present were Amanda Loomis, Planning Director, Sheila Page, Assistant <br />Planning Director and Sandhya Iyer, Economic Development Director. Michael Schanbacher, <br />joined the meeting at 5:14. <br />Mr. Hornig stated that this remote participation meeting was being held in accordance <br />with Governor Baker’s March 12, 2020 Executive Order suspending certain provisions of <br />the Open Meeting Law to allow remote participation during the State of Emergency due <br />to the outbreak of COVID-19. Mr. Hornig provided instructions to members of the <br />public, who were watching or listening to the meeting via the Zoom application, <br />regarding the process for making a public comment. <br /> <br />*****************************TOWN MEETING********************************** <br />Consideration of Proposed Amendments to Zoning Articles: Article 45, Hartwell <br />Innovation Park: <br />The Board discussed the proposed amendment to Article 45 by Ms. Arens. The Planning <br />Board unanimously voted to oppose that amendment at the last meeting. Ms. Iyer said she <br />and staff prepared a revised report for the Board’s review which Mr. Hornig shared. The <br />report was based on feedback from many stakeholders that included professional staff, <br />engineering firms, sustainability consultants, developers, and landowners in the C-HIP <br />District and will be presented at Town Meeting tonight. <br />Mr. Schanbacher joined the meeting at 5:14 p.m. <br />It was stated in the report that based on staff research and stakeholder feedback that this <br />proposed change would effectively prohibit high value life science redevelopment in the <br />majority of C-HIP District, which would defeat the whole purpose of this district. The <br />Planning Board reaffirmed that this change should not be adopted. <br />Board Member Questions for staff: <br /> Mr. Creech said he still believed that this amendment should not go forward. <br /> Ms. Thompson said she there seemed to be a lack of understanding by people of <br />what the bylaw says and what the article says. Final clarification would really <br />help and getting experts to speak on this would help and this has gone way left <br />and needs to be brought back to the middle. <br /> <br /> <br />