Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br />MEETING OF MARCH 31, 2021 <br /> <br />Minutes of the Lexington Planning Board <br />Held on March 31st, 2021, Virtual Meeting per Governor Baker’s Order at 5:05 pm <br />Present: Charles Hornig, Chair; Robert Peters, Vice-Chair; Michael Schanbacher, Clerk; and <br />Robert Creech. Also present was Amanda Loomis, Planning Director and Sheila Page, Assistant <br />Planning Director. Melanie Thompson joined the meeting later. <br />Mr. Hornig stated that this remote participation meeting was being held in accordance <br />with Governor Baker’s March 12, 2020 Executive Order suspending certain provisions of <br />the Open Meeting Law to allow remote participation during the State of Emergency due <br />to the outbreak of COVID-19. Mr. Hornig provided instructions to members of the <br />public, who were watching or listening to the meeting via the Zoom application, <br />regarding the process for making a public comment. <br /> <br />*****************************TOWN MEETING********************************** <br />Consideration of Proposed Amendments to Zoning Articles: Articles 39, 41, 44, and <br />45: <br />There were no proposed amendments to Articles 39 and 41. <br />Article 44: <br />Robert Peters moved that the Planning Board approve the amendment to Article 44 as <br />proposed which would change the threshold for requiring a loading bay for office uses in the <br />Table of Loading Requirements to 10,000 square feet. Michael Schanbacher seconded the <br />motion. The Planning Board voted in favor of the motion 4-0-0 (Roll call: Robert Peters – yes; <br />Michael Schanbacher – yes; Charles Hornig – yes; Robert Creech - yes). MOTION PASSED <br />Article 45: <br />Ms. Arens presented a proposed amendment from the Sustainable Lexington Committee <br />on height limitations based on energy use. <br />Staff Comments and Questions: <br /> Ms. Iyer said they reached out to many developers and others who said the goal <br />was to get to a place we all could agree on, the 15 BTU was too prescriptive, we <br />should be more flexible, and it would send the developers elsewhere. It would be <br />better to do this on a case-by- case basis. We do not support adding building code <br />language to the zoning bylaws. <br /> Ms. Loomis said they spoke with a lot of people, did a lot of research, and kept <br />getting other numbers. Staff was not against sustainability, but this was a very <br /> <br /> <br />