Laserfiche WebLink
C. Section 3 of Article 1 was discussed: The focus of the conversation centered on implementation <br /> impacts on private property rights and actual benefits of a new permit requirements. Mark <br /> Valenti focused on how the permit process would impact the DPW staff in terms of additional <br /> manpower requirement to process permits and respond to applicant questions. He indicated <br /> that existing DPW resources could not absorb the time and costs associated with a private <br /> property tree removal permit process. <br /> Gerry Paul indicated that the goal of the permit was not punitive, but educational and data <br /> collection focused. The permit application process would be electronic, online and <br /> automatically approved. Mark Sandeen expressed the desire to understand the overarching <br /> intent of the new permit and explore/exhaust other options that could achieve the same goals <br /> of the permit process. <br /> The Tree Committee and the DPW agreed to continue to discuss and collaborate on a process <br /> that would document private tree removals while not adding additional staff and financial <br /> burdens on existing DPW resources. <br /> D. Section 4 of Article 1: <br /> A discussion of Fees associated with the removal of trees protected under the Bylaw took place. <br /> General agreement was universal for increasing fees. The conversation focused on which <br /> method of calculating fees should be proposed (area vs. diameter). I was agreed that final <br /> decision on the method of calculation and specific fees will determined during the next several <br /> meetings. <br /> E. The Committee decided to form a subcommittee consisting of Gerry Paul, Nancy Sofen and <br /> Mark Connor to prepare a presentation of the final proposed Articles for Town Meeting. <br /> 4. Mark Valenti indicated that the tree inventory proposals have been submitted to the DPW for <br /> review. <br /> 5. 5G Impacts on Trees: <br /> An initial discussion of the impact of 5G on trees occurred. The agreed upon goal of the <br /> Committee is to be proactive in terms of tree protection and the implementation of regulations <br /> that limit the negative impacts 5G installations will have on the existing tree canopy. <br /> The Tree Committee voted 4-0 in favor of a resolution to authorize Gerry to create a letter to <br /> the Select Board supporting "strong regulations to protect trees with regards to 5G <br /> installation." <br /> 6. Hartwell Ave Rezoning: <br /> The Tree Committee is in support of the proposed "natives only" requirement for tree plantings <br /> in the rezoning proposal. We recommend our Large Shade Tree list as the basis of the new <br /> guideline. <br />